Literature DB >> 22916946

Genetic parameters for energy balance, feed efficiency, and related traits in Holstein cattle.

D M Spurlock1, J C M Dekkers2, R Fernando2, D A Koltes2, A Wolc3.   

Abstract

Objectives of the current study were to estimate genetic parameters in Holstein cows for energy balance (EB) and related traits including dry matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), energy-corrected milk (ECM) production, and gross feed efficiency (GFE), defined as the ratio of total ECM yield to total DMI over the first 150 d of lactation. Data were recorded for the first half of lactation on 227 and 175 cows in their first or later lactation, respectively. Random regression models were fitted to longitudinal data. Also, each trait was averaged over monthly intervals and analyzed by single and multivariate animal models. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.27 to 0.63, 0.12 to 0.62, 0.12 to 0.49, 0.63 to 0.72, and 0.49 to 0.53 for DMI, ECM yield, EB, BW, and BCS, respectively, averaged over monthly intervals. Daily heritability estimates ranged from 0.18 to 0.30, 0.10 to 0.26, 0.07 to 0.22, 0.43 to 0.67, and 0.25 to 0.38 for DMI, ECM yield, EB, BW, and BCS, respectively. Estimated heritability for GFE was 0.32. The genetic correlation of EB at 10d in milk (DIM) with EB at 150 DIM was -0.19, suggesting the genetic regulation of this trait differs by stage of lactation. Positive genetic correlations were found among DMI, ECM yield, and BW averaged over monthly intervals, whereas correlations of these traits with BCS depended upon stage of lactation. Total ECM yield for the lactation was positively correlated with DMI, but a negative genetic correlation between total ECM yield and EB was found. However, the genetic correlation between total ECM yield and EB in the first month of lactation was -0.02, indicating that total production is not genetically correlated with EB during the first month of lactation, when negative EB is most closely associated with diminished fitness. The genetic correlation between GFE and EB ranged from -0.73 to -0.99, indicating that selection for more efficient cows would favor a lower energy status. However, the genetic correlation between EB in the first month of lactation and GFE calculated from 75 to 150 DIM was not significant, indicating that the unfavorable correlation between GFE and EB in early lactation may be minimized with alternative definitions of efficiency. Thus, EB, GFE and related traits will likely respond to genetic selection in Holstein cows. However, the impact of selection for improved feed efficiency on EB must be carefully considered to avoid potential negative consequences of further reductions in EB at the onset of lactation.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22916946     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Global liver gene expression differences in Nelore steers with divergent residual feed intake phenotypes.

Authors:  Polyana C Tizioto; Luiz L Coutinho; Jared E Decker; Robert D Schnabel; Kamila O Rosa; Priscila S N Oliveira; Marcela M Souza; Gerson B Mourão; Rymer R Tullio; Amália S Chaves; Dante P D Lanna; Adhemar Zerlotini-Neto; Mauricio A Mudadu; Jeremy F Taylor; Luciana C A Regitano
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 2.  Go with the flow-biology and genetics of the lactation cycle.

Authors:  Eva M Strucken; Yan C S M Laurenson; Gudrun A Brockmann
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Gene expression differences in Longissimus muscle of Nelore steers genetically divergent for residual feed intake.

Authors:  Polyana C Tizioto; Luiz L Coutinho; Priscila S N Oliveira; Aline S M Cesar; Wellison J S Diniz; Andressa O Lima; Marina I Rocha; Jared E Decker; Robert D Schnabel; Gerson B Mourão; Rymer R Tullio; Adhemar Zerlotini; Jeremy F Taylor; Luciana C A Regitano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Sources of variation in maternal allocation in a long-lived mammal.

Authors:  Kaitlin R Macdonald; Jay J Rotella; Robert A Garrott; William A Link
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 5.  Opportunities to Harness High-Throughput and Novel Sensing Phenotypes to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Cori J Siberski-Cooper; James E Koltes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Use of body linear measurements to estimate liveweight of crossbred dairy cattle in smallholder farms in Kenya.

Authors:  M N Lukuyu; J P Gibson; D B Savage; A J Duncan; F D N Mujibi; A M Okeyo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-01-22

7.  Genetic parameter estimation for milk β-hydroxybutyrate and acetone in early lactation and its association with fat to protein ratio and energy balance in Korean Holstein cattle.

Authors:  Umanthi Ranaraja; KwangHyun Cho; MiNa Park; SiDong Kim; SeokHyun Lee; ChangHee Do
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.509

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.