Literature DB >> 22916901

Sampling cows to assess lying time for on-farm animal welfare assessment.

E Vasseur1, J Rushen2, D B Haley3, A M de Passillé2.   

Abstract

The time that dairy cows spend lying down is an important measure of their welfare, and data loggers can be used to automatically monitor lying time on commercial farms. To determine how the number of days of sampling, parity, stage of lactation, and production level affect lying time, electronic data loggers were used to record lying time for 10 d consecutively, at 3 stages of lactation [early: when cows were at 10-40 d in milk (DIM), mid: 100-140 DIM, late: 200-240 DIM] of 96 Holstein cows in tiestalls (TS) and 127 in freestalls (FS). We calculated daily duration of lying, bout frequency, and mean bout duration. We observed complex interactions between parity and stage of lactation, which differed somewhat between tiestalls and freestalls. First-parity cows had higher bout frequency and shorter lying bouts than older cows but bout frequency decreased and mean bout duration increased as DIM increased. We found that individual cows were not consistent in time spent lying between early and mid lactation (Pearson coefficient, TS: r = 0.1, FS: r = 0.2), whereas cows seemed to be more consistent in time spent lying between mid and late lactation (TS: r = 0.7, FS: r = 0.3). For both TS and FS cows, daily milk production was significantly, but slightly negatively, correlated with lying time across the lactation (range, r: -0.2 to -0.4), whereas parity was slightly to moderately positively correlated with mean bout duration across the lactation (r: +0.2 to +0.6) and negatively with bout frequency (r: -0.2 to -0.5). To estimate how the duration of the time sample affected the estimates of lying time subsets of data subsets consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 d per cow were created, and the relationship between the overall mean (based on 10 d) and the mean of each subset was tested by regression. For both TS and FS, lying time based on 4 d of sampling provided good estimates of the average 10-d estimate (90% of accuracy). Automated monitoring of lying time has potential as a measure of dairy cow welfare on commercial farms but cows differ greatly in lying time. To obtain a representative measure for the herd, it is necessary to sample cows based on their parity and stage of lactation but probably not milk production level.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22916901     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-5176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Hock Injury Laterality and Lameness on Lying Behaviors and Lying Laterality in Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Nicole L Eberhart; Peter D Krawczel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Pasture Access Affects Behavioral Indicators of Wellbeing in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Locomotion behavior of dairy cows on traditional summer mountain farms in comparison with modern cubicle housing without access to pasture.

Authors:  Maher Alsaaod; Salome Dürr; Damian Iten; Wolfgang Buescher; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of indoor living space on dairy cow production, reproduction and behaviour.

Authors:  Jake S Thompson; Christopher D Hudson; Jonathan N Huxley; Jasmeet Kaler; Robert S Robinson; Kathryn J Woad; Nicola Bollard; Jenny Gibbons; Martin J Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessment of feeding, ruminating and locomotion behaviors in dairy cows around calving - a retrospective clinical study to early detect spontaneous disease appearance.

Authors:  Mahmoud Fadul; Luigi D'Andrea; Maher Alsaaod; Giuliano Borriello; Antonio Di Lori; Dimitri Stucki; Paolo Ciaramella; Adrian Steiner; Jacopo Guccione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Alteration in Activity Patterns of Cows as a Result of Pain Due to Health Conditions.

Authors:  Eva Mainau; Pol Llonch; Déborah Temple; Laurent Goby; Xavier Manteca
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.