Literature DB >> 22915652

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III cross-over study evaluating the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant in combination with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients with germ cell tumors receiving 5-day cisplatin combination chemotherapy regimens: a hoosier oncology group study.

Costantine Albany1, Mary J Brames, Christopher Fausel, Cynthia S Johnson, Joel Picus, Lawrence H Einhorn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aprepitant, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5HT3-RA), and dexamethasone are standard antiemetic therapy for prevention of single-day, cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III cross-over study that compared aprepitant to placebo combined with standard antiemetic prophylaxis (a 5HT3-RA and dexamethasone) in patients receiving 5 days of cisplatin combination chemotherapy for testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving two consecutive identical courses of a 5-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to aprepitant 125 mg on day 3 and 80 mg per day on days 4 through 7 or to placebo with the initial course and crossover to the opposite treatment with the second course. The primary objective was complete response (CR). Secondary end points were emetic episodes (acute and delayed), nausea measurement based on a visual analog scale (VAS), and patient-stated preference after the second study cycle.
RESULTS: In all, 71 patients were screened for the study and 69 were evaluable. Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive aprepitant and 34 to receive placebo for the first course. Forty-two percent achieved CR with aprepitant compared with 13% with placebo (P < .001). Eleven patients (16.2%) had at least one emetic episode during the aprepitant cycle versus 32 patients (47.1%) with placebo. Thirty-eight patients preferred the aprepitant cycle whereas 11 preferred placebo (P < .001). There was no statistical difference in VAS for nausea, but it was numerically superior with aprepitant. There was no toxicity with aprepitant compared with placebo.
CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in CR rate with aprepitant combined with a 5HT3-RA and dexamethasone. Patient preference strongly favored the aprepitant cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22915652     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  Plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue and brain distribution of cisplatin in musk shrews.

Authors:  Julie L Eiseman; Jan H Beumer; Lora H Rigatti; Sandra Strychor; Kelly Meyers; Samuel Dienel; Charles C Horn
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Palliative care: Aprepitant and control of emesis induced by 5-day chemotherapy.

Authors:  Richard J Gralla
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  SEOM guide to antiemetic prophylaxis in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy 2013.

Authors:  J García Gómez; M E Pérez López; M Alonso Bermejo; Y Escobar Álvarez; J García Mata
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Prescription trends of prophylactic antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japan.

Authors:  Ayako Okuyama; Fumiaki Nakamura; Takahiro Higashi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Antiemetic efficacy and safety of a combination of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in patients with testicular germ cell tumor receiving 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shota Hamada; Shiro Hinotsu; Koji Kawai; Shigeyuki Yamada; Shintaro Narita; Tomomi Kamba; Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Yoichi Arai; Tomonori Habuchi; Osamu Ogawa; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The efficacy and safety of the addition of olanzapine to ondansetron and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Veerisa Vimolchalao; Siwat Sakdejayont; Ploytuangporn Wongchanapai; Shama Sukprakun; Pattama Angspatt; Wilai Thawinwisan; Piyachut Chenaksara; Virote Sriuranpong; Chanida Vinayanuwatikun; Napa Parinyanitikun; Nattaya Poovorawan; Suebpong Tanasanvimon
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Phase II study of palonosetron, aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by multiple-day emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Takeshi Ioroi; Junya Furukawa; Manabu Kume; Sachi Hirata; Yuko Utsubo; Naomi Mizuta; Hideaki Miyake; Masato Fujisawa; Midori Hirai
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Results of a 7-day aprepitant schedule for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in 5-day cisplatin-based germ cell tumor chemotherapy.

Authors:  I N Olver; P Grimison; M Chatfield; M R Stockler; G C Toner; V Gebski; R Harrup; C Underhill; G Kichenadasse; N Singhal; I D Davis; A Boland; A McDonald; D Thomson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of nausea and vomiting following multiple-day chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy, and breakthrough nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Einhorn; Bernardo Rapoport; Rudolph M Navari; Jørn Herrstedt; Mary J Brames
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  A randomized controlled study evaluating the efficacy of aprepitant for highly/moderately emetogenic chemotherapies in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  R Nasu; Y Nannya; M Kurokawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.