Linda Denehy1, Doug Elliott. 1. Department of Physiotherapy, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As numbers of patients who survive a critical illness increase, often within a context of comorbidities and acquired physical, mental or cognitive sequelae [postintensive care syndrome (PICS)], identifying effective recovery and rehabilitation strategies is paramount. In this review, we discuss recent studies that inform our developing understanding for improving the recovery trajectory for survivors of a critical illness during the postintensive care and posthospital periods. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies, although at this stage often presented as pilot work, provide important beginning messages for improving recovery from a critical illness. Some pilot studies demonstrate promise of effective interventions, whereas other studies offer useful baseline information for improving the power of tested interventions. SUMMARY: Innovative rehabilitation and recovery strategies during the postintensive care and posthospital periods are now being published. Further research with larger sample sizes, well-documented usual care and intervention arms and in different critical illness cohorts is required to demonstrate the optimal approaches for screening, implementation, outcome assessment and follow-up periods for rehabilitation interventions in the postintensive care phase of a patient's recovery.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As numbers of patients who survive a critical illness increase, often within a context of comorbidities and acquired physical, mental or cognitive sequelae [postintensive care syndrome (PICS)], identifying effective recovery and rehabilitation strategies is paramount. In this review, we discuss recent studies that inform our developing understanding for improving the recovery trajectory for survivors of a critical illness during the postintensive care and posthospital periods. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies, although at this stage often presented as pilot work, provide important beginning messages for improving recovery from a critical illness. Some pilot studies demonstrate promise of effective interventions, whereas other studies offer useful baseline information for improving the power of tested interventions. SUMMARY: Innovative rehabilitation and recovery strategies during the postintensive care and posthospital periods are now being published. Further research with larger sample sizes, well-documented usual care and intervention arms and in different critical illness cohorts is required to demonstrate the optimal approaches for screening, implementation, outcome assessment and follow-up periods for rehabilitation interventions in the postintensive care phase of a patient's recovery.
Authors: Kitty S Chan; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Victor D Dinglas; Catherine L Hough; Peter E Morris; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; James C Jackson; E Wesley Ely; Ramona O Hopkins; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Linda Denehy; Elizabeth H Skinner; Lara Edbrooke; Kimberley Haines; Stephen Warrillow; Graeme Hawthorne; Karla Gough; Steven Vander Hoorn; Meg E Morris; Sue Berney Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Natália A Ferreira; Agnaldo José Lopes; Arthur S Ferreira; George Ntoumenopoulos; Jerffesson Dias; Fernando S Guimaraes Journal: World J Crit Care Med Date: 2016-11-04
Authors: José Raimundo A de Azevedo; Widlani Sousa Montenegro; Djane Pereira Rodrigues; Suellen C de C Souza; Vanessa F S Araujo; Margareth Pereira de Paula; Patricia H C P Prazeres; Adenilde da Luz Leitão; Adriana V N Mendonça Journal: J Intensive Care Date: 2017-02-17
Authors: Lynn Helding; Thomas L Carroll; John Nix; Michael M Johns; Wendy D LeBorgne; David Meyer Journal: J Voice Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 2.300