Literature DB >> 22914254

Evolution of target organ damage by different values of self-blood pressure measurement in untreated hypertensive patients.

Gabriel Coll-de-Tuero1, Marc Saez, Carmen Roca-Saumell, Antonio Rodriguez-Poncelas, Pilar Franco, Antoni Dalfó, Laia Calvó-Perxas, Antonio Pose-Reino, Joan Bayó-Llibre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the prognostic value of various self-blood pressure (BP) monitoring (SBPM) cutoff at the time of diagnosis.
METHODS: Cohort of 466 newly diagnosed and never-treated hypertensive patients. At baseline and at 1 year, the patients underwent a physical examination, clinic BP (CBP), SBPM, and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), fasting blood and urine analysis, electrocardiogram (ECG), and retinography. The diagnosis of hypertension was made based on CBP average of two readings, separated by 2 min, taken over three different days, with results ≥ 140/90 mm Hg. At 1-year follow-up, target organ damage (TOD) evolution was classified as favorable or unfavorable.
RESULTS: Mean age was 57.4 years, 56.8% were men. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that hypertensive patients with baseline SBPM <135/85 mm Hg had a more favorable evolution of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (odds ratio (OR): 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-2.5), high urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) (OR: 6.9; 95% CI: 3.4-14.4), and more favorable amount of TOD evolution (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4-2.0) than those with baseline SBPM ≥ 135/85 mm Hg. Patients with baseline SBPM <130/80 mm Hg, or <125/80 mm Hg had a more favorable evolution of the amount of TOD (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 2.0-3.6, and OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 2.1-4.1, respectively) at 1 year than those with baseline SBPM <135/85 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline SBPM values <130/80 mm Hg is associated with better evolution of amount of TOD than SBPM values <135/85 mm Hg. These results would support a clinical trial to test a SBPM threshold <130/80 as an optimal pressure not needing pharmacological treatment among those with CBP ≥ 140/90.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22914254     DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2012.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  2 in total

1.  What is the optimal cut-off threshold in self-home blood pressure measurement?: A cohort study according to STROBE statement.

Authors:  Gabriel Coll-de-Tuero; Marc Saez; Antonio Rodriguez-Poncelas; Joan Bayó-Llibre; Marta Beltran-Vilella; Carla Reyes-Negre; Antoni Dalfó-Baqué; MªAntonia Barceló
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  The impact of changing home blood pressure monitoring cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on hypertension phenotypes.

Authors:  Audes D M Feitosa; Marco A Mota-Gomes; Weimar S Barroso; Roberto D Miranda; Eduardo C D Barbosa; Andréa A Brandão; Fernando Nobre; Decio Mion; Celso Amodeo; José L Lima-Filho; Andrei C Sposito; Wilson Nadruz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.