Literature DB >> 22911637

Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS).

A Sharma1, S Apostolidou, M Burnell, S Campbell, M Habib, A Gentry-Maharaj, N Amso, M W Seif, G Fletcher, N Singh, E Benjamin, C Brunell, G Turner, R Rangar, K Godfrey, D Oram, J Herod, K Williamson, H Jenkins, T Mould, R Woolas, J Murdoch, S Dobbs, S Leeson, D Cruickshank, E-O Fourkala, A Ryan, M Parmar, I Jacobs, U Menon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and slow growing borderline or Type I and aggressive Type II EOC in postmenopausal women with adnexal abnormalities on ultrasound.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in the ultrasound group of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening of postmenopausal women with ultrasound-detected abnormal adnexal (unilocular, multilocular, unilocular solid and multilocular solid, solid) morphology on their first scan. Women were followed up through the national cancer registries and by postal questionnaires. Absolute risks of EOC and borderline, Type I and Type II EOC within 3 years of initial scan were calculated.
RESULTS: Of 48 053 women who underwent ultrasound examination and had complete scan data, 4367 (9.1% (95% CI, 8.8-9.3%)) had abnormal adnexal morphology. Median follow-up was 7.09 (25(th) -75(th) centiles, 6.03-7.92) years. Forty-seven (32 borderline or Type I, 15 Type II) were diagnosed with EOC. The overall absolute risk of EOC associated with abnormal adnexal morphology was 1.08% (95% CI, 0.79-1.43%); for borderline and Type I it was 0.73% (95% CI, 0.5-1.03%); and for Type II it was 0.34% (95% CI, 0.33-0.79%). In the subgroup (n = 741) with solid elements (unilocular solid, multilocular solid and solid) overall absolute risk was 4.45% (95% CI, 3.08-6.20%), for borderline and Type I it was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.9-4.6%) and for Type II it was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4%). 11 982 women had both ovaries visualized and normal annual scans throughout the 3-year follow-up period. In this group, no borderline or Type I and eight Type II cancers were diagnosed.
CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic postmenopausal women with ultrasound-detected adnexal abnormalities with solid elements have a 1 in 22 risk for EOC. Despite the higher prevalence of Type II EOC, the risk of borderline or Type I cancer in women with ultrasound abnormalities seems to be higher than does the risk of Type II cancer. This has important immediate implications for patients with incidental adnexal findings as well as for any future ultrasound-based screening.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22911637     DOI: 10.1002/uog.12270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  16 in total

1.  Risk of Malignant Ovarian Cancer Based on Ultrasonography Findings in a Large Unselected Population.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Liina Poder; Eric Johnson; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 2.  In 2014, can we do better than CA125 in the early detection of ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Joshua G Cohen; Matthew White; Ana Cruz; Robin Farias-Eisner
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-26

3.  Evaluation of liquid from the Papanicolaou test and other liquid biopsies for the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Christopher Douville; Joshua D Cohen; Ting-Tai Yen; Isaac Kinde; Karin Sundfelt; Susanne K Kjær; Ralph H Hruban; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang; Robert J Kurman; Simeon Springer; Janine Ptak; Maria Popoli; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Lisa Dobbyn; Edward J Tanner; Ana Angarita; Maria Lycke; Kirsten Jochumsen; Bahman Afsari; Ludmila Danilova; Douglas A Levine; Kris Jardon; Xing Zeng; Jocelyne Arseneau; Lili Fu; Luis A Diaz; Rachel Karchin; Cristian Tomasetti; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Amanda N Fader; Lucy Gilbert; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sadowski; Katherine E Maturen; Andrea Rockall; Caroline Reinhold; Helen Addley; Priyanka Jha; Nishat Bharwani; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 5.  The Value of Ultrasound Monitoring of Adnexal Masses for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Suh-Burgmann; Walter Kinney
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Clinical Efficacy of Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Masafumi Koshiyama; Noriomi Matsumura; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 7.  Ultrasound Monitoring of Extant Adnexal Masses in the Era of Type 1 and Type 2 Ovarian Cancers: Lessons Learned From Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials.

Authors:  Eleanor L Ormsby; Edward J Pavlik; John P McGahan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  An Evaluation of the Applicability of the Risk of Malignancy Index for Adnexal Masses to Patients Seen at a Tertiary Hospital in Chandigarh, India.

Authors:  Sunny Chopra; Richa Vaishya; Jasbinder Kaur
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-07-10

9.  Overexpression of piRNA pathway genes in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shu Ly Lim; Carmela Ricciardelli; Martin K Oehler; Izza M D De Arao Tan; Darryl Russell; Frank Grützner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnostic potential of tumor DNA from ovarian cyst fluid.

Authors:  Yuxuan Wang; Karin Sundfeldt; Constantina Mateoiu; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Isaac Kinde; Simeon Springer; Michael Foote; Björg Kristjansdottir; Nathan James; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.