Literature DB >> 22910168

Trends in urology resident exposure to minimally invasive surgery for index procedures: a tale of two countries.

Nathan A Hoag1, Adiel Mamut, Kourosh Afshar, Christopher Amling, Jennifer J Mickelson, Andrew E Macneily.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To interrogate case-log data for American and Canadian urology residents to define trends in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery and compare operative experiences between these 2 groups.
METHODS: Case-log data from 2004 to 2009 for American urology residents was compared with Canadian residents for 8 index cases, which are routinely performed in both an MIS and open approach. These included nephrectomy (donor, radical, simple, partial), prostatectomy (radical), adrenalectomy, pyeloplasty, and nephroureterectomy.
RESULTS: Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the percentage of MIS radical prostatectomies performed by American residents (11.2%-52%), compared with Canadian residents (0.74%-11.2%). There was also a significant increase in the percentage of MIS donor nephrectomies by Canadian residents (5.6%-68.7%), compared with American residents (70.1%-89.1%). For Canadian residents, exposure to the following 3 MIS procedures increased significantly over open approaches: adrenalectomy, radical prostatectomy, and donor nephrectomy. For American residents, all index procedures with the exception of adrenalectomy underwent a significant increasing trend (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Trends for 8 index procedures confirm a continuing shift towards MIS for the majority of procedures in both countries. Differences may be only temporal and relate to dissimilar health care delivery models with a resultant lag in the adoption of laparoscopy and robotics in Canada. The impact of these trends upon ultimate surgical competence of graduates remains to be seen.
Copyright © 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22910168     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

1.  Practice makes progress: Assessing our robotic skills.

Authors:  Roger F Valdivieso; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures.

Authors:  Nedim Ruhotina; Julien Dagenais; Giorgio Gandaglia; Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Steven L Chang; Jeffrey J Leow; Kola Olugbade; Arun Rai; Jesse D Sammon; Marianne Schmid; Briony Varda; Kevin C Zorn; Mani Menon; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  [Prostate surgery within residency programs in urology].

Authors:  J Bründl; F Zengerling; H Borgmann; I Syring
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Organ procurement surgery as a means of increasing open surgical experience during urology residency training.

Authors:  Nathan A Hoag; Ryan Flannigan; Andrew E Macneily
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a New York statewide analysis of early adoption and outcomes between 2009 and 2017.

Authors:  Krishna T Ravivarapu; Olamide Omidele; John Pfail; Nir Tomer; Alexander C Small; Michael A Palese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

Review 6.  Training in endocrine surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Gimm; Marcin Barczyński; Radu Mihai; Marco Raffaelli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.