Literature DB >> 22908895

Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.

Tomomi Fujimaru1, Jin-Hee Park, Juyun Lim.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The present study investigated the sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose, an emerging natural low-calorie sweetener with various functional properties, compared to other sweeteners (sucrose, sucralose, erythritol, rebaudioside A), over a wide range of sweetness commonly found in foods and beverages (3% to 20% sucrose [w/v]). A total of 34 subjects evaluated aqueous solutions of the 5 sweeteners for the perceived intensities of sweetness, bitterness, astringency, chemical-like sensations, and sweet aftertaste, using the general version of the Labeled Magnitude Scale. The relationship between the physical concentrations of the sweeteners and their perceived sweetness (that is, psychophysical functions) was derived to quantify the relative sweetness and potency of the sweeteners. The results suggest that tagatose elicits a sweet taste without undesirable qualities (bitterness, astringency, chemical-like sensations). Out of the 5 sweeteners tested, rebaudioside A was the only sweetener with notable bitterness and chemical-like sensations, which became progressively intense with increasing concentration (P < 0.001). In terms of perceived sweetness intensity, the bulk sweeteners (tagatose, erythritol, sucrose) had similar sweetness growth rates (slopes > 1), whereas the high-potency sweeteners (sucralose, rebaudioside A) yielded much flatter sweetness functions (slopes < 1). Because the sweetness of tagatose and sucrose grew at near-identical rates (slope = 1.41 and 1.40, respectively), tagatose produced about the same relative sweetness to sucrose across the concentrations tested. However, the relative sweetness of other sweeteners to sucrose was highly concentration dependent. Consequently, sweetness potencies of other sweeteners varied across the concentrations tested, ranging from 0.50 to 0.78 for erythritol, 220 to 1900 for sucralose, and 300 to 440 for rebaudioside A, while tagatose was estimated to be approximately 0.90 times as potent as sucrose irrespective of concentration. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The present study investigated the sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose, an emerging natural low-calorie sweetener, compared to other sweeteners. Study results suggest that tagatose elicits a sweet taste without undesirable qualities over a wide range of concentrations. Tagatose produced about the same relative sweetness to sucrose across the concentrations tested, while the relative sweetness of other sweeteners was highly concentration dependent. The present data provide a general guideline when considering the use of tagatose and other sweeteners in foods and beverages.
© 2012 Institute of Food Technologists®

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22908895     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02844.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  15 in total

1.  Relative sweetness and sweetness quality of phyllodulcin [(3R)-8-Hydroxy-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-1H-isochromen-1-one].

Authors:  Min-Ji Kim; Sang-Ho Yoo; Yang Kim; Jae-Hee Hong
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.391

2.  Relative sweetness and sweetness quality of Xylobiose.

Authors:  Hye-Won Park; Min-Ji Kim; Sheungwoo Seo; Sangho Yoo; Jae-Hee Hong
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.391

3.  Glucansucrase (mutant) enzymes from Lactobacillus reuteri 180 efficiently transglucosylate Stevia component rebaudioside A, resulting in a superior taste.

Authors:  Evelien M Te Poele; Tim Devlamynck; Manuel Jäger; Gerrit J Gerwig; Davy Van de Walle; Koen Dewettinck; Anna K H Hirsch; Johannis P Kamerling; Wim Soetaert; Lubbert Dijkhuizen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in the Packaged Food Supply-An Assessment across 4 Countries.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Dunford; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Donna R Miles; Helen Eyles; Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  Ibero⁻American Consensus on Low- and No-Calorie Sweeteners: Safety, Nutritional Aspects and Benefits in Food and Beverages.

Authors:  Lluis Serra-Majem; António Raposo; Javier Aranceta-Bartrina; Gregorio Varela-Moreiras; Caomhan Logue; Hugo Laviada; Susana Socolovsky; Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo; Jorge Antonio Aldrete-Velasco; Eduardo Meneses Sierra; Rebeca López-García; Adriana Ortiz-Andrellucchi; Carmen Gómez-Candela; Rodrigo Abreu; Erick Alexanderson; Rolando Joel Álvarez-Álvarez; Ana Luisa Álvarez Falcón; Arturo Anadón; France Bellisle; Ina Alejandra Beristain-Navarrete; Raquel Blasco Redondo; Tommaso Bochicchio; José Camolas; Fernando G Cardini; Márcio Carocho; Maria do Céu Costa; Adam Drewnowski; Samuel Durán; Víctor Faundes; Roxana Fernández-Condori; Pedro P García-Luna; Juan Carlos Garnica; Marcela González-Gross; Carlo La Vecchia; Rosaura Leis; Ana María López-Sobaler; Miguel Agustín Madero; Ascensión Marcos; Luis Alfonso Mariscal Ramírez; Danika M Martyn; Lorenza Mistura; Rafael Moreno Rojas; José Manuel Moreno Villares; José Antonio Niño-Cruz; María Beatriz P P Oliveira; Nieves Palacios Gil-Antuñano; Lucía Pérez-Castells; Lourdes Ribas-Barba; Rodolfo Rincón Pedrero; Pilar Riobó; Juan Rivera Medina; Catarina Tinoco de Faria; Roxana Valdés-Ramos; Elsa Vasco; Sandra N Wac; Guillermo Wakida; Carmina Wanden-Berghe; Luis Xóchihua Díaz; Sergio Zúñiga-Guajardo; Vasiliki Pyrogianni; Sérgio Cunha Velho de Sousa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.

Authors:  May Wee; Vicki Tan; Ciarán Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Reduced Susceptibility to Sugar-Induced Metabolic Derangements and Impairments of Myocardial Redox Signaling in Mice Chronically Fed with D-Tagatose when Compared to Fructose.

Authors:  Debora Collotta; Laura Lucarini; Fausto Chiazza; Alessia Sofia Cento; Mariaconcetta Durante; Silvia Sgambellone; Jacopo Chini; Francesca Baratta; Manuela Aragno; Raffaella Mastrocola; Emanuela Masini; Massimo Collino
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Online solid phase extraction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of sucralose in reclaimed and drinking waters and its photo degradation in natural waters from South Florida.

Authors:  Sudha Rani Batchu; Natalia Quinete; Venkata R Panditi; Piero R Gardinali
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 9.  Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli.

Authors:  R G Antenucci; J E Hayes
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 10.  Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape.

Authors:  Szimonetta Lohner; Ingrid Toews; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.