Literature DB >> 22908712

Complementary habitat use by wild bees in agro-natural landscapes.

Yael Mandelik1, Rachael Winfree, Thomas Neeson, Claire Kremen.   

Abstract

Human activity causes abrupt changes in resource availability across the landscape. In order to persist in human-altered landscapes organisms need to shift their habitat use accordingly. Little is known about the mechanisms by which whole communities persist in human-altered landscapes, including the role of complementary habitat use. We define complementary habitat use as the use of different habitats at different times by the same group of species during the course of their activity period. We hypothesize that complementary habitat use is a mechanism through which native bee species persist in human-altered landscapes. To test this idea, we studied wild bee communities in agro-natural landscapes and explored their community-level patterns of habitat and resource use over space and time. The study was conducted in six agro-natural landscapes in the eastern United States, each containing three main bee habitat types (natural habitat, agricultural fields, and old fields). Each of the three habitats exhibited a unique seasonal pattern in amount, diversity, and composition of floral resources, and together they created phenological complementarity in foraging resources for bees. Individual bee species as well as the bee community responded to these spatiotemporal patterns in floral availability and exhibited a parallel pattern of complementary habitat use. The majority of wild bee species, including all the main crop visitors, used fallow areas within crops early in the season, shifted to crops in mid-season, and used old-field habitats later in the season. The natural-forest habitat supported very limited number of bees, mostly visitors of non-crop plants. Old fields are thus an important feature in these arable landscapes for maintaining crop pollination services. Our study provides a detailed examination of how shifts in habitat and resource use may enable bees to persist in highly dynamic agro-natural landscapes, and points to the need for a broad cross-habitat perspective in managing these landscapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22908712     DOI: 10.1890/11-1299.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  15 in total

1.  Effects of landscape complexity on pollinators are moderated by pollinators' association with mass-flowering crops.

Authors:  Thijs P M Fijen; Jeroen A Scheper; Bastiaen Boekelo; Ivo Raemakers; David Kleijn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in western Europe.

Authors:  Annika L Hass; Urs G Kormann; Teja Tscharntke; Yann Clough; Aliette Bosem Baillod; Clélia Sirami; Lenore Fahrig; Jean-Louis Martin; Jacques Baudry; Colette Bertrand; Jordi Bosch; Lluís Brotons; Françoise Burel; Romain Georges; David Giralt; María Á Marcos-García; Antonio Ricarte; Gavin Siriwardena; Péter Batáry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Trait-Based Modeling of Multihost Pathogen Transmission: Plant-Pollinator Networks.

Authors:  Lauren L Truitt; Scott H McArt; Andrew H Vaughn; Stephen P Ellner
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Biologia Futura: landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Péter Batáry; András Báldi; Johan Ekroos; Róbert Gallé; Ingo Grass; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2020-06-04

5.  Utility of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes for inferring wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) use of adjacent foraging habitats.

Authors:  Jessie Lanterman Novotny; Karen Goodell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Effects of Plant Diversity, Vegetation Composition, and Habitat Type on Different Functional Trait Groups of Wild Bees in Rural Beijing.

Authors:  Panlong Wu; Jan C Axmacher; Xiao Song; Xuzhu Zhang; Huanli Xu; Chen Chen; Zhenrong Yu; Yunhui Liu
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator dependence without a parallel increase in crop diversification.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Sebastián Aguiar; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Lucas A Garibaldi; David W Inouye; Chuleui Jung; Dino J Martins; Rodrigo Medel; Carolina L Morales; Hien Ngo; Anton Pauw; Robert J Paxton; Agustín Sáez; Colleen L Seymour
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Establishing Wildflower Pollinator Habitats in Agricultural Farmland to Provide Multiple Ecosystem Services.

Authors:  C Sheena Sidhu; Neelendra K Joshi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  When beggars are choosers-How nesting of a solitary bee is affected by temporal dynamics of pollen plants in the landscape.

Authors:  Anna S Persson; Florence Mazier; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Impacts of deforestation on plant-pollinator networks assessed using an agent based model.

Authors:  Adrian C Newton; Danilo Boscolo; Patrícia A Ferreira; Luciano E Lopes; Paul Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.