Literature DB >> 22908708

A 200-year perspective on alternative stable state theory and lake management from a biomanipulated shallow lake.

William O Hobbs1, Joy M Ramstack Hobbs, Toben LaFrançois, Kyle D Zimmer, Kevin M Theissen, Mark B Edlund, Neal Michelutti, Malcolm G Butler, Mark A Hanson, Thomas J Carlson.   

Abstract

Multiple stressors to a shallow lake ecosystem have the ability to control the relative stability of alternative states (clear, macrophyte-dominated or turbid, algal-dominated). As a consequence, the use of remedial biomanipulations to induce trophic cascades and shift a turbid lake to a clear state is often only a temporary solution. Here we show the instability of short-term manipulations in the shallow Lake Christina (Minnesota, USA) is governed by the long-term state following a regime shift in the lake. During the modern, managed period of the lake, three top-down manipulations (fish kills) were undertaken inducing temporary (5-10 years) unstable clear-water states. Paleoecological remains of diatoms, along with proxies of primary production (total chlorophyll a and total organic carbon accumulation rate) and trophic state (total P) from sediment records clearly show a single regime shift in the lake during the early 1950s; following this shift, the functioning of the lake ecosystem is dominated by a persistent turbid state. We find that multiple stressors contributed to the regime shift. First, the lake began to eutrophy (from agricultural land use and/or increased waterfowl populations), leading to a dramatic increase in primary production. Soon after, the construction of a dam in 1936 effectively doubled the depth of the lake, compounded by increases in regional humidity; this resulted in an increase in planktivorous and benthivorous fish reducing phytoplankton grazers. These factors further conspired to increase the stability of a turbid regime during the modern managed period, such that switches to a clear-water state were inherently unstable and the lake consistently returned to a turbid state. We conclude that while top-down manipulations have had measurable impacts on the lake state, they have not been effective in providing a return to an ecosystem similar to the stable historical period. Our work offers an example of a well-studied ecosystem forced by multiple stressors into a new long-term managed period, where manipulated clear-water states are temporary, managed features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22908708     DOI: 10.1890/11-1485.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Multi-Elements in Waters and Sediments of Shallow Lakes: Relationships with Water, Sediment, and Watershed Characteristics.

Authors:  La Toya T Kissoon; Donna L Jacob; Mark A Hanson; Brian R Herwig; Shane E Bowe; Marinus L Otte
Journal:  Wetlands (Wilmington)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.204

2.  Bacterial Communities and Their Predicted Functions Explain the Sediment Nitrogen Changes Along with Submerged Macrophyte Restoration.

Authors:  Chuan Wang; Shuangyuan Liu; Yi Zhang; Biyun Liu; Feng He; Dong Xu; Qiaohong Zhou; Zhenbin Wu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 3.  Management implications of long transients in ecological systems.

Authors:  Tessa B Francis; Karen C Abbott; Kim Cuddington; Gabriel Gellner; Alan Hastings; Ying-Cheng Lai; Andrew Morozov; Sergei Petrovskii; Mary Lou Zeeman
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Comparing effects of lake- and watershed-scale influences on communities of aquatic invertebrates in shallow lakes.

Authors:  Mark A Hanson; Brian R Herwig; Kyle D Zimmer; John Fieberg; Sean R Vaughn; Robert G Wright; Jerry A Younk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Anthropogenic alteration of nutrient supply increases the global freshwater carbon sink.

Authors:  N J Anderson; A J Heathcote; D R Engstrom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.