Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1) is a highly conserved kinase with multiple mitotic functions. Plk1 localizes to prometaphase kinetochores and is reduced at metaphase kinetochores, similar to many checkpoint signaling proteins, but Plk1 is not required for spindle checkpoint function. Plk1 is also implicated in stabilizing kinetochore-microtubule attachments, but these attachments are most stable when kinetochore Plk1 levels are low at metaphase. Therefore, it is unclear how Plk1 function at kinetochores can be understood in the context of its dynamic localization. In this paper, we show that Plk1 activity suppresses kinetochore-microtubule dynamics to stabilize initial attachments in prometaphase, and Plk1 removal from kinetochores is necessary to maintain dynamic microtubules in metaphase. Constitutively targeting Plk1 to kinetochores maintained high activity at metaphase, leading to reduced interkinetochore tension and intrakinetochore stretch, a checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest, and accumulation of microtubule attachment errors. Together, our data show that Plk1 dynamics at kinetochores control two critical mitotic processes: initially establishing correct kinetochore-microtubule attachments and subsequently silencing the spindle checkpoint.
Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1) is a highly conserved kinase with multiple mitotic functions. Plk1 localizes to prometaphase kinetochores and is reduced at metaphase kinetochores, similar to many checkpoint signaling proteins, but Plk1 is not required for spindle checkpoint function. Plk1 is also implicated in stabilizing kinetochore-microtubule attachments, but these attachments are most stable when kinetochore Plk1 levels are low at metaphase. Therefore, it is unclear how Plk1 function at kinetochores can be understood in the context of its dynamic localization. In this paper, we show that Plk1 activity suppresses kinetochore-microtubule dynamics to stabilize initial attachments in prometaphase, and Plk1 removal from kinetochores is necessary to maintain dynamic microtubules in metaphase. Constitutively targeting Plk1 to kinetochores maintained high activity at metaphase, leading to reduced interkinetochore tension and intrakinetochore stretch, a checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest, and accumulation of microtubule attachment errors. Together, our data show that Plk1 dynamics at kinetochores control two critical mitotic processes: initially establishing correct kinetochore-microtubule attachments and subsequently silencing the spindle checkpoint.
Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1) regulates numerous processes in cell division and localizes
to several intracellular sites based on interactions mediated by the Polo-box domain
(PBD; Petronczki et al., 2008; Archambault and Glover, 2009). One of these
sites is the kinetochore, where Plk1 is required for stable attachments to spindle
microtubules (Sumara et al., 2004; Hanisch et al., 2006; Peters et al., 2006; Lénárt et al., 2007). However, Plk1 levels at kinetochores
decrease dramatically when chromosomes align at metaphase (Lénárt et al., 2007), which is the time when
kinetochore microtubules should be stabilized. The reduction of Plk1 levels at
metaphase kinetochores is similar to the behavior of multiple mitotic checkpoint
signaling proteins. Mad1 and Mps1, for example, are required for the spindle
checkpoint, and their removal from kinetochores is important for checkpoint
silencing (Jelluma et al., 2010; Maldonado and Kapoor, 2011). Plk1 is not a
critical checkpoint signaling protein because its inhibition, either by RNAi or by a
small molecule inhibitor, leads to a pronounced mitotic arrest as a result of
checkpoint activation (Sumara et al., 2004;
Lénárt et al., 2007).
Because Plk1 reduction at kinetochores is puzzling in the context of regulating
microtubule attachments and is apparently not an integral component of the spindle
checkpoint, Plk1 function at kinetochores is unclear.
Results and discussion
To address the functional importance of dynamic Plk1 localization at kinetochores, we
first tested whether the localization changes affect phosphorylation of a Plk1
substrate. We designed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)–based
phosphorylation sensor to track phosphorylation changes in live cells. A previously
designed Plk1 phosphorylation sensor was specific for Plk1 in G2 but was
phosphorylated by other kinases in mitosis (Fuller
et al., 2008; Macůrek et al.,
2008). Therefore, we tested several different substrate sequences from
established Plk1 substrates (Johnson et al.,
2007) in place of the Myt1 substrate previously used. Of multiple
substrates tested, two were phosphorylated in mitosis in a Plk1-dependent manner
(Figs. 1 A and S1 [A and
B]), and we selected one of these from c-Jun for further experiments.
To measure localized phosphorylation changes at kinetochores, we fused the sensor to
the kinetochore protein Hec1. Cells were treated with nocodazole to depolymerize
microtubules, which maintains high Plk1 levels on kinetochores, or analyzed at
metaphase when kinetochore Plk1 levels are low. Phosphorylation of the
kinetochore-targeted sensor was high in nocodazole and low in metaphase cells (Fig. 1 B), consistent with the differences in
Plk1 localization. The dephosphorylation at metaphase likely reflects recruitment of
protein phosphatase 1 (PP1; Liu et al.,
2010) as well as reduced Plk1 levels.
Figure 1.
A FRET-based biosensor for Plk1 activity at kinetochores is
dephosphorylated as chromosomes align at metaphase. (A) The
YFP/CFP emission ratio was averaged over multiple mitotic cells
(n ≥ 9) expressing an untargeted Plk1
phosphorylation sensor and treated with an inhibitor for Aurora B (ZM) or
Plk1 (BI2536) or with Plk1 siRNA, as indicated. (B) The YFP/TFP emission
ratio was analyzed in cells expressing a kinetochore-targeted Plk1 sensor at
metaphase or treated with nocodazole or BI2536, as indicated
(n ≥ 10 cells, n ≥ 15
kinetochores per cell). (C and D) Cells expressing a kinetochore-targeted
Plk1 sensor (C and D) or a kinetochore-targeted Aurora B sensor (D) were
imaged live after nocodazole washout. Images (C) of the Plk1 sensor (YFP
emission) show kinetochore alignment after washout. To compare FRET changes
for the two sensors (D), the ratios for each were normalized by dividing by
the maximum value for that sensor (n ≥ 10 cells,
n ≥ 15 kinetochores per cell).
A FRET-based biosensor for Plk1 activity at kinetochores is
dephosphorylated as chromosomes align at metaphase. (A) The
YFP/CFP emission ratio was averaged over multiple mitotic cells
(n ≥ 9) expressing an untargeted Plk1
phosphorylation sensor and treated with an inhibitor for Aurora B (ZM) or
Plk1 (BI2536) or with Plk1 siRNA, as indicated. (B) The YFP/TFP emission
ratio was analyzed in cells expressing a kinetochore-targeted Plk1 sensor at
metaphase or treated with nocodazole or BI2536, as indicated
(n ≥ 10 cells, n ≥ 15
kinetochores per cell). (C and D) Cells expressing a kinetochore-targeted
Plk1 sensor (C and D) or a kinetochore-targeted Aurora B sensor (D) were
imaged live after nocodazole washout. Images (C) of the Plk1 sensor (YFP
emission) show kinetochore alignment after washout. To compare FRET changes
for the two sensors (D), the ratios for each were normalized by dividing by
the maximum value for that sensor (n ≥ 10 cells,
n ≥ 15 kinetochores per cell).We used the kinetochore-targeted Plk1 sensor to track phosphorylation dynamics as
chromosomes align at metaphase, which is when kinetochore Plk1 levels decrease. For
this assay, we arrested cells in mitosis with nocodazole and then removed the
nocodazole to allow spindle formation. As kinetochores aligned at metaphase (Fig. 1 C), the Plk1 sensor was dephosphorylated
(Fig. 1 D). For comparison, we also
analyzed phosphorylation dynamics for a previously established kinetochore-targeted
Aurora B sensor (Welburn et al., 2010),
which was dephosphorylated with similar kinetics to the Plk1 sensor (Fig. 1 D). We also analyzed both Plk1
localization and phosphorylation of the Plk1 sensor after depletion of the
kinetochore protein KNL1 by siRNA, which prevents PP1 recruitment to kinetochores at
metaphase (Liu et al., 2010).
Dephosphorylation of the Plk1 sensor depends on PP1 recruitment (Fig. S1 E), as
previously shown for the Aurora B sensor (Liu et
al., 2010), which indicates that substrates of both Plk1 and Aurora B are
dephosphorylated in a PP1-dependent manner as chromosomes align at metaphase. In
addition, removal of Plk1 from kinetochores at metaphase depends on PP1 recruitment
(Fig. S1, C and D), consistent with a previous finding that loss of PP2A phosphatase
increases Plk1 targeting to prometaphase kinetochores (Foley et al., 2011). In both cases, phosphatase levels are
inversely correlated with Plk1 recruitment, consistent with a
phosphorylation-dependent mechanism to regulate Plk1 localization, likely through
PBD binding to phosphorylated kinetochore proteins (Elia et al., 2003).To test the significance of Plk1 substrate dephosphorylation at kinetochores, we
designed a strategy to constitutively target Plk1 to kinetochores by fusing the
kinase to Hec1 (Fig. 2 A). We incorporated
the activating Plk1-T210D mutation into this chimeric protein
(Hec1-Plk1T210D) to ensure that the kinase would be active (Lee and Erikson, 1997). In cells expressing
Hec1-Plk1T210D, KNL1 localized normally, indicating that the outer
kinetochore is intact (Fig. S1 F). A kinetochore-targeted Plk1 sensor remained
phosphorylated even on aligned chromosomes in these cells, indicating that
maintaining Plk1 localization at kinetochores also maintains phosphorylation of Plk1
substrates (Fig. 2 B). In contrast,
phosphorylation of a kinetochore-targeted Aurora B sensor was not affected by
expression of Hec1-Plk1T210D (Fig. S2
C). We also examined phosphorylation of a known Plk1 substrate at
kinetochores, BubR1-S676 (Elowe et al.,
2007), and found increased phosphorylation in cells expressing
Hec1-Plk1T210D (Fig. S2, A and B). Together, these results indicate
that Hec1-Plk1T210D targets kinetochore Plk1 substrates specifically.
Figure 2.
Persistent Plk1 activity at kinetochores disrupts both interkinetochore
tension and intrakinetochore stretch. (A) Schematic of Hec1 and
Hec1-Plk1T210D constructs. (B) The YFP/TFP emission ratio was
analyzed in cells expressing a kinetochore-targeted Plk1 phosphorylation
sensor, together with either Hec1, Hec1-Plk1T210D, or
Hec1-Plk1K82R (kinase-inactive mutant), under the conditions
indicated (n ≥ 10 cells, n ≥
15 kinetochores per cell). (C–E) Cells expressing either Hec1 or
Hec1-Plk1T210D were imaged live after nocodazole washout.
Images (C) are maximal intensity projections of confocal z series. Insets
are optical sections showing individual kinetochore pairs. Note that
Hec1-Plk1T210D localizes to both kinetochores and spindle
poles. Metaphase alignment (D) and interkinetochore distance (E) were
calculated at each time point (n ≥ 40 kinetochores
per time point from multiple cells). (F–I) Cells expressing
CENP-T–GFP, together with either Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D,
were imaged live at metaphase. Images (F and G) are single confocal planes,
and insets show individual kinetochore pairs used for the line scans. Dashed
lines indicate estimated Hec1 and CENP-T positions. Distances were
calculated between sister kinetochores (H) or between Hec1 and CENP-T within
a kinetochore (n ≥ 80 kinetochore pairs from
multiple cells; I). AU, arbitrary unit. (C, F, and G) Bars, 5 µm.
Persistent Plk1 activity at kinetochores disrupts both interkinetochore
tension and intrakinetochore stretch. (A) Schematic of Hec1 and
Hec1-Plk1T210D constructs. (B) The YFP/TFP emission ratio was
analyzed in cells expressing a kinetochore-targeted Plk1 phosphorylation
sensor, together with either Hec1, Hec1-Plk1T210D, or
Hec1-Plk1K82R (kinase-inactive mutant), under the conditions
indicated (n ≥ 10 cells, n ≥
15 kinetochores per cell). (C–E) Cells expressing either Hec1 or
Hec1-Plk1T210D were imaged live after nocodazole washout.
Images (C) are maximal intensity projections of confocal z series. Insets
are optical sections showing individual kinetochore pairs. Note that
Hec1-Plk1T210D localizes to both kinetochores and spindle
poles. Metaphase alignment (D) and interkinetochore distance (E) were
calculated at each time point (n ≥ 40 kinetochores
per time point from multiple cells). (F–I) Cells expressing
CENP-T–GFP, together with either Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D,
were imaged live at metaphase. Images (F and G) are single confocal planes,
and insets show individual kinetochore pairs used for the line scans. Dashed
lines indicate estimated Hec1 and CENP-T positions. Distances were
calculated between sister kinetochores (H) or between Hec1 and CENP-T within
a kinetochore (n ≥ 80 kinetochore pairs from
multiple cells; I). AU, arbitrary unit. (C, F, and G) Bars, 5 µm.To determine how increased Plk1 activity affects kinetochore function, we repeated
the nocodazole washout assay with cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D or wild
type (wt)–Hec1 as a control. In both cases, kinetochores aligned at the
metaphase plate within ∼30 min of nocodazole washout, although alignment is
more efficient in cells expressing wt-Hec1 compared with Hec1-Plk1T210D
(Fig. 2, C and D). Cells expressing
wt-Hec1 established interkinetochore tension, measured as the distance between
sister kinetochores (1.4 ± 0.1 µm), as the kinetochores aligned. In
contrast, cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D failed to establish tension
(mean interkinetochore distance 0.9 ± 0.1 µm; Fig. 2 E), even though kinetochores were aligned at the
metaphase plate. These results indicate that spindle microtubules fail to exert
normal pulling forces on sister kinetochores when Plk1 activity remains high at
metaphase kinetochores.In addition to interkinetochore tension, deformations also occur within kinetochores
and have been implicated in spindle checkpoint silencing (Maresca and Salmon, 2009; Uchida et al., 2009). We examined these deformations, referred to as
intrakinetochore stretch, using CENP-T tagged at its C terminus with GFP and Hec1
tagged at its C terminus with mCherry to label the inner and outer kinetochore,
respectively (Fig. 2, F and G). The positions
of CENP-T and Hec1 were determined from the peak fluorescence intensities along a
line between two sister kinetochores, and the intrakinetochore stretch was
calculated as the distance between Hec1 and CENP-T within a kinetochore. The
intrakinetochore stretch was dramatically reduced in cells expressing
Hec1-Plk1T210D (0.020 ± 0.006 µm) compared with control
cells expressing wt-Hec1 (0.042 ± 0.008 µm; Fig. 2 I). The interkinetochore tension, calculated as the
distance between Hec1 spots of sister kinetochores (Fig. 2 H), was also decreased in cells expressing
Hec1-Plk1T210D as in the nocodazole washout experiment (Fig. 2 E). In contrast, expression of
Hec1-Plk1K82R, a kinase-inactive mutant, did not decrease either
interkinetochore tension or intrakinetochore stretch (Fig. S2, D–G). Both
interkinetochore tension and intrakinetochore stretch decrease in the presence of
either taxol or a low dose of nocodazole (Maresca
and Salmon, 2009; Uchida et al.,
2009), suggesting that both depend on dynamic microtubules (Khodjakov and Pines, 2010). Therefore, our
findings suggest that Plk1 activity at kinetochores regulates microtubule
dynamics.To directly test whether maintaining Plk1 activity at metaphase kinetochores affects
microtubule dynamics, we measured microtubule turnover using photoactivatable (PA)
GFP-tubulin (PA-GFP-tubulin). After activating a spot within the spindle close to
the metaphase plate, we followed the decrease of fluorescence in that spot over time
(Fig. 3, A and B). Cells treated with
taxol were used as controls to correct for photobleaching, as microtubule turnover
should be negligible in the presence of taxol. The decrease in fluorescence after
photoactivation is well fit by a double-exponential curve, with a fast phase
representing nonkinetochore microtubules and a slow phase representing the more
stable kinetochore microtubules (Mitchison,
1989; Zhai et al., 1995). In
cells expressing wt-Hec1, the half-life of kinetochore microtubules was increased in
metaphase cells relative to prometaphase (661 vs. 244 s), as expected, and further
increased by over twofold in metaphase cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D
(1,506 s). The half-lives of nonkinetochore microtubules were similar in each case
(Fig. 3 C). These results show that
maintaining Plk1 activity at metaphase kinetochores suppresses microtubule dynamics,
consistent with our findings of reduced interkinetochore tension and
intrakinetochore stretch.
Figure 3.
Persistent Plk1 activity at kinetochores suppresses microtubule
dynamics. (A) Cells expressing PA-GFP-tubulin together with
either Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D were imaged live before and after
photoactivation of a spot near the metaphase plate at t = 0. Images
show PA-GFP-tubulin or Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D visualized with
mCherry. (B) GFP intensity in the activated spot (white circles in A) was
calculated at each time point as the intensity relative to the initial value
after activation. The relative GFP intensities were corrected for
photobleaching based on a taxol control, averaged over multiple cells
(n ≥ 8), and fit with double-exponential decay
curves. AU, arbitrary unit. (C) Curve-fitting parameters Kf and
Ks represent the fast and slow time constants,
respectively.
Persistent Plk1 activity at kinetochores suppresses microtubule
dynamics. (A) Cells expressing PA-GFP-tubulin together with
either Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D were imaged live before and after
photoactivation of a spot near the metaphase plate at t = 0. Images
show PA-GFP-tubulin or Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D visualized with
mCherry. (B) GFP intensity in the activated spot (white circles in A) was
calculated at each time point as the intensity relative to the initial value
after activation. The relative GFP intensities were corrected for
photobleaching based on a taxol control, averaged over multiple cells
(n ≥ 8), and fit with double-exponential decay
curves. AU, arbitrary unit. (C) Curve-fitting parameters Kf and
Ks represent the fast and slow time constants,
respectively.To test whether the suppression of microtubule dynamics and intrakinetochore stretch
affects spindle checkpoint silencing, we measured the time spent in metaphase for
cells expressing either wt-Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D. Cells with chromosomes
aligned at the metaphase plate were selected and tracked for 60 min to determine the
time of anaphase onset (Videos
1 and 2). Only 30% of cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D entered
anaphase within 30 min compared with 80% of cells expressing wt-Hec1 (Fig. 4 A). To test whether the metaphase arrest
is a result of activation of the spindle checkpoint, we treated cells with
reversine, a chemical inhibitor of the Mps1 kinase (Santaguida et al., 2010). Inhibition of Mps1 accelerated
progress through metaphase of cells expressing wt-Hec1 (Fig. 4 A), consistent with the known requirement of Mps1 for
checkpoint function. Strikingly, 94% of cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D
entered anaphase within 30 min after Mps1 inhibition, indicating that the spindle
checkpoint was responsible for the metaphase arrest. Furthermore, Mad2-GFP is
present on multiple metaphase kinetochores in cells expressing
Hec1-Plk1T210D, consistent with continued checkpoint activation (Fig.
S2, H and I). Overall, the effects of increased Plk1 activity at kinetochores are
similar in several respects to the effects of taxol: reduced microtubule dynamics,
reduced interkinetochore tension and intrakinetochore stretch, and failure to
silence the spindle checkpoint.
Figure 4.
Kinetochores with persistent Plk1 activity accumulate microtubule
attachment errors and fail to silence the spindle checkpoint. (A)
Cells expressing either Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D were selected at
metaphase and followed for 60 min to determine the time of anaphase onset
(n > 20). The Mps1 inhibitor reversine was
added, as indicated, at t = 0 to override the spindle checkpoint. (B
and C) Cells expressing Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D were briefly
permeabilized and treated with calcium to remove nonkinetochore
microtubules, fixed, and stained for microtubules. Images (B) are maximal
intensity projections of confocal z series. Insets show sister kinetochore
pairs in optical sections. Images are scaled differently in the insets to
show merotelic attachments (arrows) more clearly. The number of kinetochores
with microtubules attached from both directions (merotelic errors) was
determined (n = 20 cells; C). (D–F) For cells
treated with reversine at metaphase, as in A, the fraction of cells with
lagging kinetochores in anaphase (D) and the number of laggers per cell (E)
were determined (n > 20). Images (F) show a
representative cell expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D with lagging
kinetochores in anaphase. Insets show lagging kinetochores at higher
magnification. Note that Hec1-Plk1T210D localizes to kinetochores
and spindle poles and to the anaphase spindle midzone. DIC, differential
interference contrast. (B and F) Bars, 5 µm.
Kinetochores with persistent Plk1 activity accumulate microtubule
attachment errors and fail to silence the spindle checkpoint. (A)
Cells expressing either Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D were selected at
metaphase and followed for 60 min to determine the time of anaphase onset
(n > 20). The Mps1 inhibitor reversine was
added, as indicated, at t = 0 to override the spindle checkpoint. (B
and C) Cells expressing Hec1 or Hec1-Plk1T210D were briefly
permeabilized and treated with calcium to remove nonkinetochore
microtubules, fixed, and stained for microtubules. Images (B) are maximal
intensity projections of confocal z series. Insets show sister kinetochore
pairs in optical sections. Images are scaled differently in the insets to
show merotelic attachments (arrows) more clearly. The number of kinetochores
with microtubules attached from both directions (merotelic errors) was
determined (n = 20 cells; C). (D–F) For cells
treated with reversine at metaphase, as in A, the fraction of cells with
lagging kinetochores in anaphase (D) and the number of laggers per cell (E)
were determined (n > 20). Images (F) show a
representative cell expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D with lagging
kinetochores in anaphase. Insets show lagging kinetochores at higher
magnification. Note that Hec1-Plk1T210D localizes to kinetochores
and spindle poles and to the anaphase spindle midzone. DIC, differential
interference contrast. (B and F) Bars, 5 µm.In addition to effects on the spindle checkpoint, microtubules must be dynamic to
allow correction of kinetochore–microtubule attachment errors (Bakhoum et al., 2009a,b). To test whether high Plk1 activity at metaphase
kinetochores promotes attachment errors, cells were fixed after brief treatment with
calcium to destabilize nonkinetochore microtubules, leaving kinetochore microtubules
intact. Cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D contained large numbers of
merotelic attachment errors (20.6 ± 1.1 per cell), in which a single
kinetochore is attached to both spindle poles, whereas these errors were rare (2.3
± 0.4 per cell) in cells expressing wt-Hec1 (Fig. 4, B and C). Merotelic errors are often associated with lagging
chromosomes in anaphase because the kinetochore is pulled in both directions (Cimini et al., 2001). We examined anaphase
segregation in cells that were treated with reversine at metaphase to bypass the
checkpoint arrest. Cells expressing Hec1-Plk1T210D frequently exhibited
lagging chromosomes in anaphase (6.3 ± 1.6 per cell) compared with cells
expressing wt-Hec1 (0.4 ± 0.2 per cell; Fig.
4 [D–F] and Videos
3–5). Merotelic microtubule attachments were also observed in
fixed anaphase cells (Fig. S3
A). Together, these findings indicate that maintaining Plk1 activity
at metaphase kinetochores disrupts two essential processes in metaphase: spindle
checkpoint silencing and correction of merotelic attachment errors.Our findings address the question of why Plk1 is removed from metaphase kinetochores
to maintain dynamic microtubules but raise the question of why Plk1 levels are high
at prometaphase kinetochores. We considered the possibility that Plk1 activity
stabilizes microtubules to promote formation of the initial attachments. To test
this idea, we disrupted Plk1 targeting to kinetochores by overexpressing the PBD,
which competes with endogenous Plk1 for kinetochore binding (Hanisch et al., 2006). GFP-Plk1 localizes to centrosomes in
cells expressing moderate levels of PBD-mCherry but fails to localize to
kinetochores (Fig. S3 B), indicating the Plk1 function is specifically disrupted at
kinetochores. Furthermore, staining with a phosphospecific antibody showed that
phosphorylation of BubR1-S676, a known Plk1 substrate at kinetochores (Elowe et al., 2007), was severely reduced in
cells expressing PBD-mCherry, whereas total kinetochore BubR1 levels were unchanged
(Fig. S3, C–F). We used the nocodazole washout assay to determine how
efficiently kinetochores establish stable microtubule attachments during spindle
formation. At time points up to 70 min after nocodazole washout, we measured the
fraction of kinetochores aligned at the metaphase plate with cold-stable microtubule
fibers and the microtubule staining intensity adjacent to these kinetochores (Fig. 5, A–C). Cells expressing the PBD
established cold-stable attachments much more slowly than control cells (Fig. 5 B), with severely reduced tubulin
staining at those kinetochores that do have attachments (Fig. 5 C). A previous result showed that cells expressing the
PBD contain a few unattached kinetochores (Hanisch
et al., 2006), but because PBD overexpression leads to a mitotic arrest,
the cells have a long time to establish stable attachments. The nocodazole washout
assay provides information about how attachments are stabilized over time, starting
from the early stages of spindle assembly. Our results show that stabilization of
the initial kinetochore–microtubule interactions in prometaphase depends on
Plk1 activity at kinetochores.
Figure 5.
Plk1 activity at kinetochores is required for efficient formation of
stable kinetochore–microtubule attachments. (A–C)
Cells expressing PBD-mCherry or untransfected controls were fixed at the
indicated time points after nocodazole washout and analyzed for cold-stable
microtubules. Images (A) are maximal intensity projections of confocal z
series. Insets are optical sections showing individual kinetochores. The
PBD-mCherry images are scaled differently in the insets to show kinetochores
more clearly. The fraction of aligned kinetochores with cold-stable
attachments (B) and the microtubule staining intensities adjacent to
kinetochores (C) were determined at each time point (n
≥ 10 cells, n ≥ 30 kinetochores per cell).
AU, arbitrary unit. (D) A model showing that Aurora B and Plk1 activities
are both high in prometaphase and have opposite effects on kinetochore
microtubules, with Aurora B destabilizing and Plk1 stabilizing. In
metaphase, both Aurora B and Plk1 activities are reduced at kinetochores,
whereas PP1 is recruited. The reduction of Plk1 activity is important for
maintaining dynamic microtubules, establishing intrakinetochore stretch and
interkinetochore tension, silencing the spindle checkpoint, and correcting
attachment errors (which can also occur in prometaphase).
Plk1 activity at kinetochores is required for efficient formation of
stable kinetochore–microtubule attachments. (A–C)
Cells expressing PBD-mCherry or untransfected controls were fixed at the
indicated time points after nocodazole washout and analyzed for cold-stable
microtubules. Images (A) are maximal intensity projections of confocal z
series. Insets are optical sections showing individual kinetochores. The
PBD-mCherry images are scaled differently in the insets to show kinetochores
more clearly. The fraction of aligned kinetochores with cold-stable
attachments (B) and the microtubule staining intensities adjacent to
kinetochores (C) were determined at each time point (n
≥ 10 cells, n ≥ 30 kinetochores per cell).
AU, arbitrary unit. (D) A model showing that Aurora B and Plk1 activities
are both high in prometaphase and have opposite effects on kinetochore
microtubules, with Aurora B destabilizing and Plk1 stabilizing. In
metaphase, both Aurora B and Plk1 activities are reduced at kinetochores,
whereas PP1 is recruited. The reduction of Plk1 activity is important for
maintaining dynamic microtubules, establishing intrakinetochore stretch and
interkinetochore tension, silencing the spindle checkpoint, and correcting
attachment errors (which can also occur in prometaphase).
Conclusions
Current models for regulation of kinetochore–microtubule interactions
focus on tension-dependent changes in Aurora B kinase activity at kinetochores
(Kelly and Funabiki, 2009; Santaguida and Musacchio, 2009; Lampson and Cheeseman, 2011). Aurora B
has a well-established function in destabilizing attachments, and a large body
of work has shown that multiple Aurora B substrates at kinetochores participate
in this process (Kelly and Funabiki,
2009; Lampson and Cheeseman,
2011). Because Aurora B substrates are highly phosphorylated in the
low-tension state (DeLuca et al., 2006;
Liu et al., 2009; Welburn et al., 2010; Salimian et al., 2011), it has been
unclear how stable attachments initially form in prometaphase. Our findings
provide a resolution to this question: Plk1 activity is high at prometaphase
kinetochores and stabilizes kinetochore microtubules to balance the
destabilizing activity of Aurora B. Another factor contributing to the initial
stabilization is the recruitment of PP2A to prometaphase kinetochores, which can
dephosphorylate Aurora B substrates (Foley et
al., 2011). Many Plk1 substrates and interacting proteins have been
identified at kinetochores (Petronczki et al.,
2008; Archambault and Glover,
2009; Hegemann et al., 2011;
Kettenbach et al., 2011; Hood et al., 2012), and unraveling their
various contributions to regulating microtubule dynamics will be an important
subject for future investigation.Formation of stable attachments depends on Plk1 activity at kinetochores early in
mitosis, but subsequent removal of this activity is critical for maintaining
dynamic microtubules at bioriented kinetochores. Successful completion of
mitosis depends on both correcting attachment errors and silencing the spindle
checkpoint, and both processes fail if Plk1 activity remains high in metaphase.
The increased microtubule stability and merotelic attachments (Figs. 3 and 4) are similar to defects observed in chromosomally unstable cancer
cells (Bakhoum et al., 2009a,b) and suggest an explanation for the
increased Plk1 expression in many cancers (Strebhardt and Ullrich, 2006). In addition, our findings provide
insight into the regulation of intrakinetochore stretch, which is an important
factor in spindle checkpoint silencing (Maresca and Salmon, 2009; Uchida
et al., 2009), through Plk1-dependent changes in microtubule
dynamics.We show that phosphorylation of Plk1 and Aurora B biosensors change in parallel
as chromosomes align (Fig. 1 D),
consistent with previous findings that endogenous substrates are phosphorylated
at prometaphase kinetochores and dephosphorylated at metaphase (DeLuca et al., 2006; Elowe et al., 2007; Welburn et al., 2010; Salimian et
al., 2011). Proper regulation of kinetochore microtubules depends on
a dynamic balance between the two kinases (Fig.
5 D), and both interact with INCENP (Goto et al., 2006; Carmena et al., 2012). Plk1 and Aurora B activities have opposite
effects on kinetochore–microtubule dynamics, as either Aurora B
inhibition (Cimini et al., 2006) or
increased Plk1 activity (Fig. 3)
suppresses microtubule turnover. Despite the apparent similarity, however, the
effects of these perturbations are not the same. High Plk1 activity leads to
reduced interkinetochore tension and intrakinetochore stretch (Fig. 2). In contrast, interkinetochore
tension is not affected by partial Aurora B inhibition and is increased by
mutation of Aurora B target sites in Hec1 (Cimini et al., 2006; DeLuca et al.,
2006). These observations suggest that two different modes of
regulating kinetochore microtubules depend on two highly conserved mitotic
kinases. Aurora B function has been extensively studied, but major open
questions remain regarding Plk1 substrates, their interactions with
microtubules, and mechanisms controlling the dynamic Plk1 localization at
kinetochores.
Materials and methods
Cell culture, transfection, and inhibitors
HeLa cells were cultured in growth medium: DME with 10% FBS and
penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5%
CO2. Cells were transfected with plasmid DNA using FuGENE (Roche)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions and then used for analysis 2
d after transfection. The Plk1 inhibitor BI2536 was used at 100 nM. Taxol was
used at 10 µM. The Mps1 inhibitor reversine was used at 500 nM, which
does not inhibit Aurora B in live cells (Santaguida et al., 2010). The siRNA oligonucleotides targeting Plk1
(5′-CGAGCUGCUUTTUGACGAGUU-3′; Kraft et al., 2003) and KNL1
(5′-GGAAUCCAAUGCUUUGAG-3′; Liu
et al., 2010) were synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Plasmids
The design of the Plk1 phosphorylation sensors is based on a protein kinase C
sensor (Violin et al., 2003): a CFP/YFP
FRET pair with a substrate peptide and an FHA2 phospho-Thr–binding domain
in between. The Plk1 phosphorylation sensors were created by modifying
previously reported untargeted and kinetochore-targeted Aurora B sensors (Fuller et al., 2008; Welburn et al., 2010). The amino acid
sequence DDALNATFLPSEG from c-Jun was used as a Plk1 substrate
(Johnson et al., 2007), with Thr
replacing Ser at position 17 (italicized) to match the requirement for FHA2
binding (Durocher et al., 2000), instead
of the Aurora B substrate sequence in the previous sensors. The second sequence
tested was PPSLSSTVLIVRN from BRCA2, with the Plk1 target
Thr207 italicized and Thr203 mutated to Ser to prevent FHA2 binding to multiple
sites. The kinetochore-targeted sensors, which contain mTFP1 (TFP) instead of
CFP, as previously described (Liu et al.,
2009), were fusions to either the N terminus of Hec1 or the C
terminus of Mis12. The Hec1 fusion was used for all experiments, except that the
Mis12 fusion was used in cells expressing Hec1-wt or Hec1-Plk1T210D
(Fig. 2 B). The untargeted and
kinetochore-targeted (fusion to the N terminus of Hec1) Aurora B sensors follow
the same basic design but with Aurora B substrate sequences, as previously
described (Fuller et al., 2008; Welburn et al., 2010).Hec1-mCherry was created by replacing GFP with mCherry in vector pEGFP-N1 and
inserting Hec1 at the N terminus of mCherry. Hec1-mCherry-Plk1T210D
(referred to as Hec1-Plk1T210D) was created by inserting the humanPlk1T210D mutant (a gift from B.H. Kwok, University of Montreal, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada) at the C terminus of mCherry and Hec1 at the N terminus of
mCherry in vector pCDNA3.1. GFP-Plk1 was a gift from B.H. Kwok.
CENP-T–GFP was created by inserting CENP-T (a gift from I.M. Cheeseman,
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA) at the N terminus of
GFP in the pEGFP-N1 vector. PBD-mCherry was created by inserting amino acids
326–603 of humanPlk1 at the N terminus of mCherry in vector pEGFP-N1.
PA-GFP-tubulin was a gift from J.M. Murray (University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA).
Live imaging and data analysis
For live imaging, cells were plated on 22 × 22–mm glass coverslips
(no. 1.5; Thermo Fisher Scientific) coated with poly-d-lysine
(Sigma-Aldrich). Coverslips were mounted in custom-designed Rose chambers using
L-15 medium without phenol red (Invitrogen). Temperature was maintained at
∼35°C using either an air stream incubator (ASI 400; Nevtek) or an
environmental chamber (Incubator BL; PeCon GmbH).Live imaging of the kinetochore-targeted phosphorylation sensors was performed
with a spinning-disk confocal microscope (DM4000; Leica) equipped with a
100× 1.4 NA objective, an XY Piezo-Z stage (Applied Scientific
Instrumentation), a scanhead (CSU-10; Yokogawa Corporation of America), an
electron multiplier charge-coupled device camera (ImageEM; Hamamatsu Photonics),
and a laser merge module equipped with 440-, 488-, and 593-nm lasers (LMM5;
Spectral Applied Research) controlled by MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices).
TFP was excited at 440 nm, and TFP and YFP emissions were acquired
simultaneously with a beam splitter (Dual-View; Optical Insights, LLC). Custom
software written in MATLAB (MathWorks) was used for image analysis, as
previously described (Fuller et al.,
2008). In brief, individual kinetochores were defined automatically
from confocal image stacks (five planes, 0.5-µm spacing), and the YFP/TFP
emission ratio was calculated at each kinetochore. For single time point
analyses, five z planes were acquired with 0.5-µm spacing. To measure
dephosphorylation dynamics after nocodazole washout, a single image was taken at
each time point to minimize photobleaching. The YFP/TFP emission ratios were
calculated and averaged over multiple cells. Experiments were repeated multiple
times (n ≥ 5 for Figs. 1
B and 2 B, and
n = 2 for Fig. 1
D) with similar results.Live imaging of untargeted phosphorylation sensors was performed on a microscope
(DM6000; Leica) with a 40× 1.25 NA objective and a charge-coupled device
camera (ORCA-AG; Hamamatsu Photonics) controlled by MetaMorph software. CFP was
excited with a CFP excitation filter, and CFP and YFP emissions were acquired
sequentially by switching between CFP and YFP emission filters using a filter
wheel (Ludl Electronic Products). The YFP/CFP emission ratio in each image was
calculated after background subtraction and averaged over multiple cells.
Experiments were repeated multiple times (n = 3 for
Fig. 1 A, and n
= 2 for Fig. S1 [A and B]) with similar results.For nocodazole washout assays, cells were incubated in a low concentration of
nocodazole (30 ng/ml) in growth medium for 0.5–1 h to disrupt the
spindle. Cells were washed four times with fresh L-15 medium to remove
nocodazole at time 0 to allow spindle formation. Using the spinning-disk
confocal described in this section, one image was acquired every 5 min for the
phosphorylation sensors or one image stack (three planes, 0.5-µm spacing)
for Hec-mCherry or Hec1-mCherry-Plk1T210D. Kinetochore alignment and
interkinetochore distances (Fig. 2, D and
E) were averaged over multiple cells from three independent
experiments.For interkinetochore distance and intrakinetochore stretch measurements (Fig. 2, F–I), images of
CENP-T–GFP and Hec1-mCherry were acquired using the spinning-disk
confocal described in this section. Fluorescence intensities of GFP and mCherry
were measured along a line between the two sister kinetochores, and the position
of peak intensity at each kinetochore was determined manually. The
intrakinetochore stretch was calculated as the distance between the GFP peak and
the mCherry peak within a single kinetochore. Results were averaged over
multiple cells from four independent experiments.To measure the time to anaphase and the frequency of lagging chromosomes (Fig. 4), cells were imaged every 2 min for
60 min (five z planes, 0.5-µm spacing at each time point) using the
spinning-disk confocal described in this section. Lagging chromosomes were
counted and averaged over multiple cells from three independent experiments.
Photoactivation assay
Photoactivation experiments were performed with the spinning-disk confocal
described in the previous section, using a scanhead with a 405-nm laser (iLas;
Roper Scientific). Cells transfected with PA-GFP-tubulin together with either
Hec1-mCherry-Plk1 or Hec1-mCherry were imaged once before activation to
determine the position of the kinetochores followed by activation of spindle
microtubules adjacent to the metaphase plate. After activation, one image was
acquired every 10 s initially and then every 30 s to minimize photobleaching.
Only cells in which the activated spot stayed in focus for the duration of the
experiment were further analyzed. Fluorescence intensities were measured at each
time point in a circle defined by the size of the activated region using ImageJ
software (National Institutes of Health). Background was subtracted by measuring
the same pixel area adjacent to the spindle. The values were corrected for
photobleaching by determining the fluorescence loss in activated cells treated
with taxol (10 µM). Data were averaged over multiple cells and then
fitted to a double-exponential curve, shown as Y = Pf
exp(−Kft) + Ps
exp(−Kst), in which Y is the proportion of the initial
fluorescence intensity, P is the proportion of fast (f) and slow (s) decay of
fluorescence, K is the rate constant for fluorescence decay, and t is time.
Curve fitting was performed using the curve fitting tool box in MATLAB. The
turnover half-time (t1/2) was calculated as ln2/k
for each fast and slow process.
Cold-stable microtubule assay and immunofluorescence
To examine cold-stable microtubules, cells were incubated on ice for 10 min in
L-15 medium with 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.3, fixed for 10 min at room temperature with
4% formaldehyde in 100 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 10 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, and
0.2% Triton X-100, and stained for tubulin using DM1-α antibody (1:3,000;
Sigma-Aldrich) and CREST antiserum (1:10,000) with Alexa Fluor 488 and 594
secondary antibodies (1:1,000; Invitrogen). Images were acquired with the
aforementioned spinning-disk confocal. To measure the intensities of microtubule
plus ends at kinetochores, a line (width = 5 pixels) was drawn across the
plus end of an individual kinetochore–microtubule fiber, close to the
kinetochore. The maximal intensity across the line was determined using the Plot
profile function of ImageJ, and intensities were averaged over multiple
microtubule fibers after background subtraction.To detect merotelic attachments, cells were permeabilized for 2 min at
37°C in 100 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM
CaCl2, and 0.1% Triton X-100 and then fixed for 10 min in the
same buffer supplemented with 4% formaldehyde. Cells were stained for tubulin
using DM1-α antibody (1:3,000), and images were acquired with the
aforementioned spinning-disk confocal. Merotelic errors were counted in multiple
cells from three independent experiments.To measure phosphorylation of BubR1, cells were incubated with nocodazole (100
ng/ml for 30 min), fixed with 4% formaldehyde in 100 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 10 mM
EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.2% Triton X-100, and stained with a
phosphospecific antibody against BubR1 S676-P (1:1,000; a gift from S. Elowe,
Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Québec, Canada) or an antibody against BubR1
(1:1,000; Abcam) together with CREST antiserum (1:10,000). Secondary antibodies
were Alexa Fluor 488 and 593 (1:1,000; Invitrogen). KNL1 staining was performed
with a rabbit pAb (a gift from I.M. Cheeseman).
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows characterization of Plk1 phosphorylation sensors and
Hec1-Plk1T210D. Fig. S2 shows effects of
Hec1-Plk1T210D expression. Fig. S3 shows effects of
Hec1-Plk1T210D or PBD-mCherry expression. Video 1 shows a control
cell expressing Hec1-mCherry, imaged from metaphase to anaphase. Video 2 shows a
cell expressing Hec1-mCherry-Plk1T210D, imaged from metaphase for 60
min with no anaphase onset. Video 3 shows a control cell expressing
Hec1-mCherry, imaged from metaphase to anaphase with reversine added at t
= 0. Video 4 shows a cell expressing Hec1-mCherry-Plk1T210D,
imaged from metaphase to anaphase with reversine added at t = 0,
corresponding to the images shown in Fig. 4
F. Video 5 shows another example of a cell expressing
Hec1-mCherry-Plk1T210D, imaged from metaphase to anaphase with
reversine added at t = 0. Online supplemental material is available at
http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.201205090/DC1.
Authors: D Durocher; I A Taylor; D Sarbassova; L F Haire; S L Westcott; S P Jackson; S J Smerdon; M B Yaffe Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Izabela Sumara; Juan F Giménez-Abián; Daniel Gerlich; Toru Hirota; Claudine Kraft; Consuelo de la Torre; Jan Ellenberg; Jan-Michael Peters Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2004-10-05 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Björn Hegemann; James R A Hutchins; Otto Hudecz; Maria Novatchkova; Jonathan Rameseder; Martina M Sykora; Sihan Liu; Michael Mazanek; Péter Lénárt; Jean-Karim Hériché; Ina Poser; Norbert Kraut; Anthony A Hyman; Michael B Yaffe; Karl Mechtler; Jan-Michael Peters Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Mar Carmena; Xavier Pinson; Melpi Platani; Zeina Salloum; Zhenjie Xu; Anthony Clark; Fiona Macisaac; Hiromi Ogawa; Ulrike Eggert; David M Glover; Vincent Archambault; William C Earnshaw Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Ting-Yu Yeh; Anna K Kowalska; Brett R Scipioni; Frances Ka Yan Cheong; Meiying Zheng; Urszula Derewenda; Zygmunt S Derewenda; Trina A Schroer Journal: EMBO J Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 11.598