Literature DB >> 22908135

Automated 22-kD growth hormone-specific assay without interference from Pegvisomant.

Jenny Manolopoulou1, Younes Alami, Stephan Petersenn, Jochen Schopohl, Zida Wu, Christian J Strasburger, Martin Bidlingmaier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large variability exists among different growth hormone (GH) assays owing to differences in calibration, antibody specificity, isoform recognition, and interference from GH binding protein (GHBP). The GH receptor antagonist Pegvisomant presents a new challenge because Pegvisomant interferes with many GH assays. A recent consensus conference established criteria for standardization and evaluation of GH assays. Following consensus recommendations, we developed a new GH assay on an automated analyzer (IDS-iSYS, Immunodiagnostic Systems).
METHODS: A monoclonal antibody not cross-reacting with Pegvisomant was combined with a monoclonal antibody specific for 22-kD GH. Isoform specificity and interference from GHBP was tested and compared to that seen in 2 existing automated GH assays (Siemens Immulite, Diasorin Liaison). We also compared GH concentrations measured by the 3 assays for healthy volunteers and patients with acromegaly receiving different treatments. Using the iSYS assay, we also established nadir GH values during oral glucose load and analyzed changes in endogenous GH during Pegvisomant treatment.
RESULTS: Analytical and functional sensitivities were 0.01 μg/L and 0.04 μg/L, with a dynamic range from 0.04 to 100 μg/L. Intraassay CVs were 2%-4%, whereas interassay CVs were 5%-7% at GH concentrations between 1.7 and 27.5 μg/L. The assay was specific for 22-kD GH and not affected by GHBP. The presence of Pegvisomant, which leads to a negative bias on the Immulite and dramatic overestimation of GH on the Liaison, had no impact on the iSYS GH assay.
CONCLUSIONS: The new assay fulfils recent consensus recommendations and presents a useful new tool for reliable measurement of GH.
© 2012 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22908135     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.188128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  14 in total

1.  Exploiting Nanobodies in the Detection and Quantification of Human Growth Hormone via Phage-Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.

Authors:  Hossam Murad; Jana Mir Assaad; Rasha Al-Shemali; Abdul Qader Abbady
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 2.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Advances in differential diagnosis and management of growth hormone deficiency in children.

Authors:  Camille Hage; Hoong-Wei Gan; Anastasia Ibba; Giuseppa Patti; Mehul Dattani; Sandro Loche; Mohamad Maghnie; Roberto Salvatori
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  IGF-1-based screening reveals a low prevalence of acromegaly in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Daniel A Heinrich; Claudia Reinholz; Maximilian Bauer; Amanda Tufman; Richard Frohner; Jochen Schopohl; Martin Bidlingmaier; Robert P Kosilek; Martin Reincke; Harald J Schneider
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Tamoxifen as a therapeutic agent in acromegaly.

Authors:  Irida Balili; Ariel Barkan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Pegvisomant-primed glucagon stimulation test in assessing GH reserve and GH/IGF kinetics in adults suspected of GH deficiency.

Authors:  Kevin C J Yuen; Jan Frystyk; Sharon A Rhoads; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Prognostic value of nadir GH levels for long-term biochemical remission or recurrence in surgically treated acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Carlos Reyes-Vidal; Simran Singh; Yessica DeLeon; Zhezhen Jin; Alexander G Khandji; Serge Cremers; Kalmon D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Soluble Alpha Klotho in Acromegaly: Comparison With Traditional Markers of Disease Activity.

Authors:  Júnia R O L Schweizer; Katharina Schilbach; Michael Haenelt; Alexandre V Giannetti; Mariana F Bizzi; Beatriz S Soares; Eduardo Paulino; Jochen Schopohl; Sylvère Störmann; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  In vitro impact of pegvisomant on growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma cells.

Authors:  Thomas Cuny; Caroline Zeiller; Martin Bidlingmaier; Céline Défilles; Catherine Roche; Marie-Pierre Blanchard; Marily Theodoropoulou; Thomas Graillon; Morgane Pertuit; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Alain Enjalbert; Thierry Brue; Anne Barlier
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Soluble Klotho: a possible predictor of quality of life in acromegaly patients.

Authors:  Eva C Coopmans; Nour El-Sayed; Jan Frystyk; Nils E Magnusson; Jens O L Jørgensen; Aart-Jan van der Lely; Joop A M J L Janssen; Ammar Muhammad; Sebastian J C M M Neggers
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.