Literature DB >> 22907256

Effect of material properties on predicted vesical pressure during a cough in a simplified computational model of the bladder and urethra.

Thomas Spirka1, Kimberly Kenton, Linda Brubaker, Margot S Damaser.   

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence is a condition that affects mainly women and is characterized by the involuntary loss of urine in conjunction with an increase in abdominal pressure but in the absence of a bladder contraction. In spite of the large number of women affected by this condition, little is known regarding the mechanics associated with the maintenance of continence in women. Urodynamic measurements of the pressure acting on the bladder and the pressures developed within the bladder and the urethra offer a potential starting point for constructing computational models of the bladder and urethra during stress events. The measured pressures can be utilized in these models to provide information to specify loads and validate the models. The main goals of this study were to investigate the feasibility of incorporating human urodynamic pressure data into a computational model of the bladder and the urethra during a cough and determine if the resulting model could be validated through comparison of predicted and measured vesical pressure. The results of this study indicated that simplified models can predict vesical pressures that differ by less than 5 cmH(2)O (<10%) compared to urodynamic pressure measurements. In addition, varying material properties had a minimal impact on the vesical pressure and displacements predicted by the model. The latter finding limits the use of vesical pressure as a validation criterion since different parameters can yield similar results in the same model. However, the insensitivity of vesical pressure predictions to material properties ensures that the outcome of our models is not highly sensitive to tissue material properties, which are not well characterized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22907256      PMCID: PMC3677772          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0637-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  19 in total

1.  Controversies in female urethral anatomy and their significance for understanding urinary continence: observations and literature review.

Authors:  J M Haderer; H K Pannu; R Genadry; G M Hutchins
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

2.  Measuring morphological parameters of the pelvic floor for finite element modelling purposes.

Authors:  Stepán Janda; Frans C T van der Helm; Sjoerd B de Blok
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Peggy Norton; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A shell finite element model of the pelvic floor muscles.

Authors:  D d'Aulignac; J A C Martins; E B Pires; T Mascarenhas; R M Natal Jorge
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  PelvicSim--a computational-experimental system for biomechanical evaluation of female pelvic floor organ disorders and associated minimally invasive interventions.

Authors:  Balakrishna Haridas; Hyundae Hong; Ryo Minoguchi; Steve Owens; Thomas Osborn
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

Review 6.  Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 7.  An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations.

Authors:  P E Petros; U I Ulmsten
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1990

8.  Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  A material sensitivity study on the accuracy of deformable organ registration using linear biomechanical models.

Authors:  Y Chi; J Liang; D Yan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor.

Authors:  James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  6 in total

1.  Analyzing the effects of instillation volume on intravesical delivery using biphasic solute transport in a deformable geometry.

Authors:  Sean G Smith; Boyce E Griffith; David A Zaharoff
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Modern Theories of Pelvic Floor Support : A Topical Review of Modern Studies on Structural and Functional Pelvic Floor Support from Medical Imaging, Computational Modeling, and Electromyographic Perspectives.

Authors:  Yun Peng; Brandi D Miller; Timothy B Boone; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Urethral support in female urinary continence part 2: a computational, biomechanical analysis of Valsalva.

Authors:  Megan R Routzong; Liam C Martin; Ghazaleh Rostaminia; Steven Abramowitch
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  A computational analysis of the effect of supporting organs on predicted vesical pressure in stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Mojtaba Barzegari; Bahman Vahidi; Mohammad Reza Safarinejad; Mahtab Ebad
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  On Structure-Function Relationships in the Female Human Urethra: A Finite Element Model Approach.

Authors:  Ali Attari; John O DeLancey; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Evaluation of Selected Properties of Sodium Alginate-Based Hydrogel Material-Mechanical Strength, μDIC Analysis and Degradation.

Authors:  Jagoda Kurowiak; Agnieszka Mackiewicz; Tomasz Klekiel; Romuald Będziński
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.