Literature DB >> 22906867

Respondents in an epidemiologic survey had fewer psychotropic prescriptions than nonrespondents: an insight into health-related selection bias using routine health insurance data.

Marie-Noël Vercambre1, Fabien Gilbert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Using register-based insurance data, we aimed to evaluate health-related differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a mailed epidemiologic survey, with a particular focus on mental health. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: In 2005, 19,406 adults covered by the national education system health insurance plan were sent a general health questionnaire including a significant part devoted to mental health. Of them, 52% responded. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we compared participants and nonparticipants on various sociodemographic characteristics, morbidity variables, and health care utilization indicators derived from the routine health insurance databases, regardless of response status. Mental health was appraised through the reimbursement of psychiatric services and the volume of psychotropic prescriptions received in 2004-05.
RESULTS: In addition to traditional sociodemographic covariates of participation, we observed that respondents used more medical services than nonrespondents (visits to general practitioners, dentists, and specialists other than psychiatrists) but essentially for somatic disorders, as they also were prescribed significantly fewer psychotropic drugs.
CONCLUSION: Response bias may impact estimation quality even in apparently sociodemographically homogeneous populations. Our results confirmed that persons with mental complaints are less likely to respond to a survey focused on their troubles and illustrate the risk of underestimation of psychiatric disease in population-based surveys.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906867     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  12 in total

1.  Lifestyle factors and social ties associated with the frequency of laughter after the Great East Japan Earthquake: Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Mayumi Hirosaki; Tetsuya Ohira; Seiji Yasumura; Masaharu Maeda; Hirooki Yabe; Mayumi Harigane; Hideto Takahashi; Michio Murakami; Yuriko Suzuki; Hironori Nakano; Wen Zhang; Mayu Uemura; Masafumi Abe; Kenji Kamiya
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Insomnia symptoms and subsequent psychotropic medication: a register-linked study with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Peija Haaramo; Tea Lallukka; Eero Lahelma; Christer Hublin; Ossi Rahkonen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Second-stage non-response in the Swiss health survey: determinants and bias in outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Volken
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Health behaviors: is there any distinction for teachers? A cross-sectional nationwide study.

Authors:  Fabien Gilbert; Jean-Baptiste Richard; Pascale Lapie-Legouis; François Beck; Marie-Noël Vercambre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Registry-based analysis of participator representativeness: a source of concern for sickness absence research?

Authors:  Marit Knapstad; Jesper Löve; Kristina Holmgren; Gunnel Hensing; Simon Øverland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Perception of Radiation Risk as a Predictor of Mid-Term Mental Health after a Nuclear Disaster: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Itaru Miura; Masato Nagai; Masaharu Maeda; Mayumi Harigane; Senta Fujii; Misari Oe; Hirooki Yabe; Yuriko Suzuki; Hideto Takahashi; Tetsuya Ohira; Seiji Yasumura; Masafumi Abe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effects of Psychological and Lifestyle Factors on Metabolic Syndrome Following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Atsushi Takahashi; Tetsuya Ohira; Kanako Okazaki; Seiji Yasumura; Akira Sakai; Masaharu Maeda; Hirooki Yabe; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Akira Ohtsuru; Yukihiko Kawasaki; Michio Shimabukuro; Junichiro Kazama; Shigeatsu Hashimoto; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Hironori Nakano; Fumikazu Hayashi; Hitoshi Ohto; Kenji Kamiya; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.928

8.  Cancer patients' participation in population-based health surveys: findings from the HUNT studies.

Authors:  Sophie D Fosså; Alv A Dahl; Arnulf Langhammer; Harald Weedon-Fekjær
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-05

9.  The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up.

Authors:  Marie Zins; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  The Relationship between Starting to Drink and Psychological Distress, Sleep Disturbance after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Disaster: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Masatsugu Orui; Yuka Ueda; Yuriko Suzuki; Masaharu Maeda; Tetsuya Ohira; Hirooki Yabe; Seiji Yasumura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.