Literature DB >> 22906599

The impact of distension pressure on acute endothelial cell loss and neointimal proliferation in saphenous vein grafts.

Robert Stigler1, Christina Steger, Thomas Schachner, Johannes Holfeld, Michael Edlinger, Michael Grimm, Severin Semsroth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the extent of acute endothelial cell loss and neointimal proliferation in the long-term in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) exposed to defined distension pressures.
METHODS: During routine competence testing of SVGs for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), blinded peak pressure measurements were performed in 10 patients. In an experimental set-up, distension pressure-related endothelial damage was studied in the SVGs of 20 patients. In a subgroup (n = 10), each patient's SVG was divided into segments and subjected to four constant pressures (50, 100, 150 and 300 mmHg) for 30 min each. In another subgroup (n = 10), SVGs were exposed to a short phase of high pressure (low pressure followed by 300 mmHg for 5 min). Acute endothelial cell loss was quantified by CD31-immunostaining. After 2 weeks of organ culture, the neointimal proliferation was evaluated using histomorphometry. Pressure-related damage was compared with damage at baseline (0 mmHg).
RESULTS: During routine competence testing for CABG, we revealed a median peak pressure of 355 mmHg (range: 240-639 mmHg). In the experimental set-up, significant acute endothelial cell loss occurred at all tested distension pressures: at 50 mmHg, the median endothelial cell loss was 29% (range: 20-51%, P = 0.015), at 100 mmHg 54% (range: 37-69%, P < 0.001), at 150 mmHg 75% (range: 41-88%, P < 0.001), at 300 mmHg 91% (range: 63-100%, P < 0.001) and at short high-pressure exposure 65% (range: 49-82%, P < 0.001) in comparison with 20% (range: 0-44%) at baseline. Significant neointimal proliferation occurred when a distension pressure of 50 mmHg was exceeded: at 50 mmHg, median neointimal proliferation was 97 µm (range: 60-380 µm, P = 0.176), at 100 mmHg 168 µm (range: 100-600 µm, P = 0.001), at 150 mmHg 183 µm (range: 160-440 µm, P < 0.001) at 300 mmHg 347 µm (range: 190-590 µm, P < 0.001) and at short high-pressure exposure 130 µm (range: 60-410 µm, P = 0.02) in comparison with 90 µm (range: 60-170 µm) at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro exposure of SVGs to low distension pressure ranges causes significant acute endothelial cell loss and crucial long-term damage, namely neointimal proliferation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906599     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  14 in total

1.  Pressure control during preparation of saphenous veins.

Authors:  Fan Dong Li; Susan Eagle; Colleen Brophy; Kyle M Hocking; Michael Osgood; Padmini Komalavilas; Joyce Cheung-Flynn
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  No-touch saphenous vein graft harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Yu Inaba; Masataka Yamazaki; Masatoshi Ohono; Kentaro Yamashita; Hiroaki Izumida; Kanako Hayashi; Tatsuo Takahashi; Naritaka Kimura; Tsutomu Ito; Hideyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

3.  No-touch vein grafts and the destiny of venous revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25th anniversary perspective.

Authors:  Ninos Samano; Michael Dashwood; Domingos Souza
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

4.  Does No-Touch Technique Better than Conventional or Intermediate Saphenous Vein Harvest Techniques for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Elshafay; Ahmed Hesham Bendary; Huan Thanh Vuong; Ahmed Reda Ahmed; Mohamed Ashraf Mokhtar; Ali Lotfy Soliman; Nguyen Lam Vuong; Israa Atia El Bestawi; Nirmeen Atef Abdallah; Vi Tuong Vu; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Unregulated saphenous vein graft distension decreases tissue viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Brian C Evans; Craig L Duvall; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Colleen M Brophy
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Traditional graft preparation decreases physiologic responses, diminishes viscoelasticity, and reduces cellular viability of the conduit: A porcine saphenous vein model.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Weifeng Luo; Daniel L Feldman; Jun Song; Padmini Komalavilas; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Colleen M Brophy
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Early growth response protein 1 promotes restenosis by upregulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in vein graft.

Authors:  Kui Zhang; Jian Cao; Ran Dong; Jie Du
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  The effect of distension pressure on endothelial injury and vasodilatation response in saphenous vein grafts: conversion of a bypass graft to a dead pipe.

Authors:  Selami Gurkan; Ozcan Gur; Volkan Yuksel; Ebru Tastekin; Serhat Huseyin; Demet Ozkaramanli Gur; Suat Canbaz
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2014-06-29

9.  The Case for Endothelial Preservation via Pressure-Regulated Distension in the Preparation of Autologous Saphenous Vein Conduits in Cardiac and Peripheral Bypass Operations.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Colleen M Brophy
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

10.  Limiting Injury During Saphenous Vein Graft Preparation For Coronary Arterial Bypass Prevents Metabolic Decompensation.

Authors:  Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Jun Song; Igor Voskresensky; Eric S Wise; Yapu Liu; Yanhua Xiong; Susan S Eagle; Colleen M Brophy; C Robb Flynn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.