Literature DB >> 22906524

Mammography screening and trust: the case of interval breast cancer.

Marit Solbjør1, John-Arne Skolbekken, Ann Rudinow Sætnan, Anne Irene Hagen, Siri Forsmo.   

Abstract

Interval cancer is cancer detected between screening rounds among screening participants. In the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, 19 per 10,000 screened women are diagnosed with interval cancer. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 such women. The women interpreted their interval breast cancer in two ways: that mammography can never be completely certain, or as an experience characterized by shock and doubts about the technology and the conduct of the medical experts. Being diagnosed with interval cancer thus influenced their trust in mammography, but not necessarily to the point of creating distrust. The women saw themselves as exceptions in an otherwise beneficial screening programme. Convinced that statistics had shown benefits from mammography screening and knowing others whose malignant tumours had been detected in the programme, the women bracketed their own experiences and continued trusting mammography screening. Facing a potentially lethal disease and a lack of alternatives to mammography screening left the women with few options but to trust the programme in order to maintain hope. In other words, trust may not only be a basis for hope, but also a consequence of it.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906524     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

Review 1.  Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-07-01

2.  Women's participation in breast cancer screening in France--an ethical approach.

Authors:  Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; Sylviane Darquy; Sandrine de Montgolfier; Frédérique Papin-Lefebvre; Odile Jullian; Jérôme Viguier; Hélène Sancho-Garnier
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Patient-physician relationships, health self-efficacy, and gynecologic cancer screening among women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Kaitlin M McGarragle; Melyssa Aronson; Kara Semotiuk; Spring Holter; Crystal J Hare; Sarah E Ferguson; Zane Cohen; Tae L Hart
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  Women's responses to information about overdiagnosis in the UK breast cancer screening programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Elaine Douglas; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help-seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Karen N Barnett; David Weller; Steve Smith; Robert Jc Steele; Peter Vedsted; Sheina Orbell; Sue M Moss; Jane W Melia; Julietta Patnick; Christine Campbell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Health professionals' experiences with the implementation of a digital medication dispenser in home care services - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hanne H Kleiven; Birgitte Ljunggren; Marit Solbjør
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.