Literature DB >> 22906490

Women's perspectives of the stages and phases of labour.

Lesley Dixon1, Joan Skinner, Maralyn Foureur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: within childbirth there is a common and widely known explanation of labour and birth which describes and defines the birth process as stages and phases. The aim of this research was to determine whether the discourse of labour as stages and phases resonated with women who had experienced spontaneous labour and birth.
METHOD: a critical feminist standpoint methodology was used to explore the perspectives of 18 New Zealand women through in-depth, one to one, interviews.
FINDINGS: the participants did not talk about their labour as occurring in stages or phases and often considered this description to be an abstract concept. The current descriptions of labour onset and progression did not appear to resonate with these women or provide sufficient clarity for them to understand how far they had progressed in their labour. For women who had previously laboured there was the ability to make comparisons with their previous experiences and therefore experiential knowledge was privileged over other forms of knowledge. Despite this the discourse of measurement of cervical dilatation was dominant and considered as an authoritative means of determining labour and labour progress. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: women considered labour to be a continuous process. If women are to be able to make sense of their experience of labour, the maternity sector needs to explore and determine descriptions of labour which resonate more fully with the woman's experience of labour and birth.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906490     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  12 in total

1.  Maternal childbirth experience and time in labor: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Sara Carlhäll; Marie Nelson; Maria Svenvik; Daniel Axelsson; Marie Blomberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Gillian Ml Gyte; Hannah G Dahlen; Gill Thomson; Mandisa Singata-Madliki; Andrew Clegg; Soo Downe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Psychometric properties of the Swedish childbirth self-efficacy inventory (Swe-CBSEI).

Authors:  Ing-Marie Carlsson; Kristina Ziegert; Eva Nissen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Being in a safe and thus secure place, the core of early labour: A secondary analysis in a Swedish context.

Authors:  Ing-Marie Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-05-10

5.  Labour pain experiences and perceptions: a qualitative study among post-partum women in Ghana.

Authors:  Lydia Aziato; Angela Kwartemaa Acheampong; Kitimdow Lazarus Umoar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions.

Authors:  Rachel Reed; Rachael Sharman; Christian Inglis
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Duration of spontaneous labour in 'low-risk' women with 'normal' perinatal outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Edgardo Abalos; Olufemi T Oladapo; Mónica Chamillard; Virginia Díaz; Julia Pasquale; Mercedes Bonet; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Antenatal cervical length measurement as a predictor of successful vaginal birth.

Authors:  Omima T Taha; Mohamed Elprince; Khaled A Atwa; Asmaa M Elgedawy; Amal A Ahmed; Rasha E Khamees
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Women's psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Ibone Olza; Patricia Leahy-Warren; Yael Benyamini; Maria Kazmierczak; Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir; Andria Spyridou; Esther Crespo-Mirasol; Lea Takács; Priscilla J Hall; Margaret Murphy; Sigridur Sia Jonsdottir; Soo Downe; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.