Literature DB >> 22905931

Mind wandering and reading comprehension: examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience.

Nash Unsworth1, Brittany D McMillan1.   

Abstract

Individual differences in mind wandering and reading comprehension were examined in the current study. In particular, individual differences in mind wandering, working memory capacity, interest in the current topic, motivation to do well on the task, and topic experience and their relations with reading comprehension were examined in the current study. Using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling it was found that variation in mind wandering while reading was influenced by working memory capacity, topic interest, and motivation. Furthermore, these same factors, along with topic experience, influenced individual differences in reading comprehension. Importantly, several factors had direct effects on reading comprehension (and mind wandering), while the relation between reading comprehension (and mind wandering) and other factors occurred via indirect effects. These results suggest that both domain-general and domain-specific factors contribute to mind wandering while reading and to reading comprehension.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22905931     DOI: 10.1037/a0029669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  45 in total

1.  Meditation and the Wandering Mind: A Theoretical Framework of Underlying Neurocognitive Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tracy Brandmeyer; Arnaud Delorme
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  On the relation between motivation and retention in educational contexts: The role of intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Jeffrey D Wammes; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

3.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-07-18

4.  Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Schubert; Gidon T Frischkorn; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 6.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.

Authors:  Megan L Jordano; Dayna R Touron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

8.  Testing the attention-distractibility trait.

Authors:  Matt E Meier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-11

9.  The relation between task-unrelated media multitasking and task-related motivation.

Authors:  Brandon C W Ralph; Alyssa C Smith; Paul Seli; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-18

10.  Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.