Literature DB >> 22905897

Therapist focus on ambivalence and commitment: a longitudinal analysis of Motivational Interviewing treatment ingredients.

Molly Magill1, Robert L Stout, Timothy R Apodaca.   

Abstract

The present study examines two core therapeutic principles of Motivational Interviewing (MI) with alcohol and other substance use disorders. Specifically, therapist focus on client ambivalence and commitment to change, as well as a more general indicator of goal assessment, were tested as process predictors of subsequent alcohol use across four sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy. Participants were adult alcohol users involved in a large multisite clinical trial (Project MATCH; two arms Aftercare [AC] and Outpatient [OP]). A series of multilevel models examined the effect of proposed MI ingredients on alcohol use (percent days abstinent; drinks per drinking day) over a 12-week treatment period, and whether these effects interacted with time and client baseline motivation. Therapist effort to elicit client commitment to change alcohol use was associated with greater rates of abstinence among both AC and OP participants, and reduced drinking quantity among OP participants. However, therapist focus on ambivalence was associated with greater drinking quantity among OP participants, and when motivation was low, among AC participants. Goal assessment was a marginal to nonsignificant predictor across outcomes, and all interactions with time were nonsignificant. Therapist-reported treatment foci are important to subsequent patterns of drinking within a multisession MI, but the role of ambivalence and discrepancy is worthy of further clinical and empirical consideration. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22905897      PMCID: PMC3650101          DOI: 10.1037/a0029639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  32 in total

Review 1.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; John W Finney; Carolyn E Swearingen; Pamela Vergun
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.

Authors:  Paul C Amrhein; William R Miller; Carolina E Yahne; Michael Palmer; Laura Fulcher
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2003-10

3.  The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Brian L Burke; Hal Arkowitz; Marisa Menchola
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2003-10

4.  Can the practitioner correctly predict outcome in motivational interviewing?

Authors:  John Strang; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2004-07

5.  Motivational interventions for heavy drinking college students: examining the role of discrepancy-related psychological processes.

Authors:  Abigail M McNally; Tibor P Palfai; Christopher W Kahler
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2005-03

6.  How does motivational interviewing work? Therapist interpersonal skill predicts client involvement within motivational interviewing sessions.

Authors:  Theresa B Moyers; William R Miller; Stacey M L Hendrickson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-08

7.  Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing sessions.

Authors:  Theresa B Moyers; Tim Martin
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2006-04

8.  Using motivational interviewing with smokers: do therapist behaviors relate to engagement and therapeutic alliance?

Authors:  Thuy Boardman; Delwyn Catley; James E Grobe; Todd D Little; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2006-08-01

Review 9.  The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Eirini I Vasilaki; Steven G Hosier; W Miles Cox
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.826

10.  What do we know? Process analysis and the search for a better understanding of Project MATCH's anger-by-treatment matching effect.

Authors:  Mitchell P Karno; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence-based alcohol use disorder treatments.

Authors:  Molly Magill; Justin Walthers; Nadine R Mastroleo; Jacques Gaume; Richard Longabaugh; Timothy R Apodaca
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Compounding risk: An examination of associations between spirituality/religiosity, drinking motives, and alcohol-related ambivalence among heavy drinking young adults.

Authors:  Dawn W Foster; Chelsie M Young; Jennifer L Bryan; Michelle C Quist
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of MI's key causal model.

Authors:  Molly Magill; Jacques Gaume; Timothy R Apodaca; Justin Walthers; Nadine R Mastroleo; Brian Borsari; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-05-19

4.  Examining motivational interviewing's effect on confidence and commitment using daily data.

Authors:  Alexis Kuerbis; Kevin G Lynch; Sijing Shao; Jon Morgenstern
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Exploration of treatment matching of problem drinker characteristics to motivational interviewing and non-directive client-centered psychotherapy.

Authors:  Alexis Kuerbis; Jessica Houser; Svetlana Levak; Sijing Shao; Jon Morgenstern
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-12-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.