Literature DB >> 22905857

Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: results of randomized global phase III study 305.

Jacqueline A French1, Gregory L Krauss, Bernhard J Steinhoff, David Squillacote, Haichen Yang, Dinesh Kumar, Antonio Laurenza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily doses of perampanel 8 and 12 mg when added to 1-3 concomitantly administered, approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.
METHODS: Study 305 was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients aged 12 years and older with ongoing seizures despite prior therapy with at least two AEDs, and currently receiving 1-3 AEDs. Equal randomization to once-daily oral perampanel 8 or 12 mg, or placebo was performed. Patients entered a 19-week double-blind treatment phase comprising a 6-week titration period, with weekly 2-mg dose increments, followed by a 13-week maintenance period. Primary efficacy end points were the responder rate (proportion of patients who had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency during treatment per 28 days relative to baseline), and the percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to pre-perampanel baseline. A secondary end point was percent change in the frequency of complex partial plus secondarily generalized seizures. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. KEY
FINDINGS: Three hundred eighty-six patients were randomized and treated with study medication. Of these, 321 patients completed the study. The 50% responder rates (intent-to-treat analysis) were 14.7%, 33.3%, and 33.9%, respectively, for placebo, perampanel 8 mg, and perampanel 12 mg, with significant improvements over placebo for both perampanel 8 mg (p = 0.002) and 12 mg (p < 0.001). The median percent change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days (intent-to-treat analysis) was -9.7%, -30.5%, and -17.6% for placebo, 8 mg, and 12 mg, respectively, with significant reductions compared with placebo for both 8 mg (p < 0.001) and 12 mg (p = 0.011). For complex partial seizures plus partial seizures that secondarily generalized, the median percent change in frequency was -32.7% (8 mg), -21.9 (12 mg), and -8.1% (placebo), with significant reductions for both 8 mg (p < 0.001) and 12 mg (p = 0.005). The most frequent (occurring in ≥10% of patients in any treatment group) treatment-emergent AEs were dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and headache, with an apparent dose effect suggested for all except headache. SIGNIFICANCE: This phase III trial demonstrated that adjunctive treatment with once-daily perampanel at 8 mg and 12 mg was effective in improving seizure control in patients 12 years and older with refractory partial-onset seizures. These study results also demonstrated that once-daily doses of 8 mg and 12 mg were safe and acceptably tolerated in this study. Perampanel demonstrated a favorable risk/benefit ratio in this population. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2012 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22905857     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03638.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  97 in total

Review 1.  Perampanel.

Authors: 
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2014-12-19

2.  Time to prerandomization monthly seizure count in perampanel trials: A novel epilepsy endpoint.

Authors:  Jacqueline A French; Antonio Gil-Nagel; Stefano Malerba; Lynn Kramer; Dinesh Kumar; Emilia Bagiella
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  [Perampanel as a therapy option in patients with epilepsy].

Authors:  M Hintz; S Nawratil; A Schulze-Bonhage
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  [New aspects in the field of epilepsy].

Authors:  F Rosenow; K M Klein; A Strzelczyk; H M Hamer; K Menzler; S Bauer; S Knake
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Comparing Safety and Efficacy of "Third-Generation" Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment.

Authors:  Charlotte S Kwok; Emily L Johnson; Gregory L Krauss
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Synthesis, pharmacology and preclinical evaluation of 11C-labeled 1,3-dihydro-2H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-ones for imaging γ8-dependent transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Wakana Mori; Xiaofei Zhang; Tomoteru Yamasaki; Patrick J Dunn; Genwei Zhang; Hualong Fu; Tuo Shao; Yiding Zhang; Akiko Hatori; Longle Ma; Masayuki Fujinaga; Lin Xie; Xiaoyun Deng; Hua Li; Qingzhen Yu; Jian Rong; Lee Josephson; Jun-An Ma; Yihan Shao; Susumu Tomita; Ming-Rong Zhang; Steven H Liang
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 7.  Preclinical pharmacology of perampanel, a selective non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist.

Authors:  M A Rogawski; T Hanada
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  2013

Review 8.  AMPA receptors as a molecular target in epilepsy therapy.

Authors:  M A Rogawski
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  2013

9.  Recent and Emerging Anti-seizure Drugs: 2013.

Authors:  William O Tatum
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Radiosynthesis and preliminary evaluation of 11C-labeled 4-cyclopropyl-7-(3-methoxyphenoxy)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[e] [1,2,4] thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide for PET imaging AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Jiahui Chen; Jiefeng Gan; Jiyun Sun; Zhen Chen; Hualong Fu; Jian Rong; Xiaoyun Deng; Jingjie Shang; Jian Gong; Tuo Shao; Lee Collier; Lu Wang; Hao Xu; Steven H Liang
Journal:  Tetrahedron Lett       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.415

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.