| Literature DB >> 22905796 |
Erin Karlstedt1, Anjala Chelvanathan, Megan Da Silva, Kelby Cleverley, Kanwal Kumar, Navdeep Bhullar, Matthew Lytwyn, Sheena Bohonis, Sacha Oomah, Roman Nepomuceno, Xiaozhou Du, Steven Melnyk, Matthew Zeglinski, Robin Ducas, Mehdi Sefidgar, Scott Mackenzie, Sat Sharma, Iain D Kirkpatrick, Davinder S Jassal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have correlated elevations in cardiac biomarkers of injury post marathon with transient and reversible right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction as assessed by both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Whether or not permanent myocardial injury occurs due to repeated marathon running in the aging population remains controversial.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22905796 PMCID: PMC3438060 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-58
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Patient clinical characteristics (n = 25)
| Age (y) | 55 ± 4 | |
| Gender, n (%) | | |
| Male | 21 (84) | |
| Female | 4 (16) | |
| Weight (kg) | 68±9 | 68±8 |
| Height (cm) | 169±8 | 169±8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24±2 | 24±2 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 63±11 | 95±8 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 128±11 | 114±12 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 72±5 | 67±6 |
Values are mean ± SD. y, years; BMI, body mass index; bpm, beats per minute; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
Cardiac biomarker data for study population at baseline and post marathon (n = 25)
| Myoglobin (mg/L) | 42 (27–90) | 690 (416–1832)* | 72 (50–101) |
| CK (U/l) | 125 (96–185) | 752 (445–1829)* | 165 (103–375) |
| cTnT (ug/L) | <0.01 | 0.52 (0.38-0.81)* | <0.01 |
Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
*p < 0.05, after the race vs. baseline.
Echocardiographic data in study population at baseline and post marathon (n = 25)
| LVEDD (mm) | 50 ± 3 | 51 ± 5 | 50 ± 4 | 0.93 |
| LVESD (mm) | 33 ± 5 | 34 ± 4 | 32 ± 5 | 0.82 |
| LVEDV (ml) | 114 ± 12 | 110 ± 10 | 112 ± 11 | 0.72 |
| LVESV (ml) | 39 ± 11 | 38 ± 13 | 40 ± 11 | 0.77 |
| IVS (mm) | 9 ± 2 | 9 ± 1 | 9 ± 2 | 0.82 |
| PWT (mm) | 9 ± 1 | 8 ± 2 | 9 ± 2 | 0.71 |
| LVEF (%) | 63 ± 4 | 62 ± 6 | 64 ± 3 | 0.79 |
| LV mass/BSA (g/m2) | 102 ± 11 | 103 ± 15 | 99 ± 17 | 0.49 |
| LA diameter (mm) | 36 ± 4 | 37 ± 3 | 36 ± 5 | 0.66 |
| LA volume (ml) | 42 ± 11 | 44 ± 13 | 40 ± 13 | 0.44 |
| RA volume (ml) | 37 ± 12 | 61 ± 12 | 31 ± 13 | 0.01* |
| RVEDD (mm) | 27 ± 3 | 45 ± 2 | 32 ± 4 | 0.02* |
| RV FAC (%) | 48 ± 3 | 29 ± 6 | 49 ± 4 | 0.01* |
| TAPSE (mm) | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.02* |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, after the race vs. baseline.
2D, 2 dimensional; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; LVEDD, LV end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, LV end-systolic diameter; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume; LVESV, LV end-systolic volume; IVS, interventricular septum; PWT, posterior wall thickness; LVEF, LV ejection fraction; BSA, body surface area; LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium; RVEDD, RV end-diastolic diameter; FAC, fractional area change; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
Conventional and novel diastolic echo parameters in patient population (n = 25)
| Mitral E velocity (cm/s) | 0.8±0.2 | 0.5±0.3 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.76 |
| Mitral A velocity (cm/s) | 0.5±0.1 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.68 |
| Mitral E/A ratio | 1.6±0.2 | 1.5±0.1 | 1.6±0.1 | 0.72 |
| Mitral E decel time (ms) | 208±52 | 212±63 | 214±48 | 0.65 |
| Lateral S’ (cm/s) | 10.1±1.0 | 10.2±0.3 | 10.4±1.0 | 0.58 |
| Lateral E’ (cm/s) | 11.4±0.6 | 7.6±1.1* | 10.1±0.7** | <0.01 |
| Lateral A’ (cm/s) | 4.2±1.2 | 8.2±1.0* | 6.1±1.1** | <0.01 |
| S’ at base (cm/s) | 11.3±0.9 | 8.7±1.2* | 11.0±0.9 | <0.01 |
| E’ at base (cm/s) | 11.6±1.0 | 9.5±0.9* | 10.3±0.5** | <0.01 |
| A’ at base (cm/s) | 7.8 ±1.1 | 10.3±0.9* | 9.8±0.4** | <0.01 |
Values are mean ± SD. MR, mitral regurgitation; decel, deceleration; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure. *Post-race compared to baseline. **One week follow-up compared to baseline.
CMR data in study population at baseline and 24 hr post marathon (n = 25)
| LVEDD (mm) | 52 ± 3 | 51 ± 4 |
| LVESD (mm) | 31 ± 4 | 30 ± 5 |
| LVEDV/BSA (ml/m2) | 82 ± 9 | 84 ± 7 |
| LVESV/BSA (ml/m2) | 24 ± 8 | 26 ± 6 |
| IVS (mm) | 9 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 |
| PWT (mm) | 9 ± 2 | 9 ± 1 |
| LVEF (%) | 67 ± 4 | 69 ± 3 |
| LV mass/ BSA (g/m2) | 126 ± 14 | 123 ± 9 |
| LA diameter (mm) | 34 ± 4 | 36 ± 6 |
| LA volume/ BSA (ml/m2) | 26 ± 8 | 27 ± 4 |
| RA volume (ml) | 39 ± 8 | 57 ± 10* |
| RVEDD (cm) | 33 ± 5 | 47 ± 4* |
| RVEDV (ml) | 133 ± 19 | 190 ± 18* |
| RVEF (%) | 65 ± 3 | 44 ± 6* |
| RV mass/BSA (g/m2) | 32 ± 4 | 34 ± 3 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, after the race vs. baseline.
CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; LVEDD, LV end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, LV end-systolic diameter; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume; LVESV, LV end-systolic volume; IVS, interventricular septum; PWT, posterior wall thickness; LVEF, LV ejection fraction; BSA, body surface area; LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium; RVEDD, RV end-diastolic diameter; RVEDV, RV end-diastolic volume; RVEF, RV ejection fraction.
Figure 1A) Short axis phase sensitive IR-prepared T1-weighted TurboFLASH MR image demonstrating subendocardial enhancement involving the anterior wall of the LV at baseline, prior to the marathon (arrows).B) Curved planar reformation of a contrast-enhanced CT angiogram in the same patient demonstrating a >70% stenosis of the LAD artery (arrow).