PURPOSE: To report on integrated endourology suites (IES), remote monitoring and supervision (RMS) of urology residents and to evaluate patients' opinions, acceptance, and satisfaction level with IES and RMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy in the IES with RMS were surveyed using a questionnaire. All procedures were performed by junior urology residents (UR-1 level) using RMS. Patients were studied using a nine-question survey to evaluate their comfort level, acceptance, and level of satisfaction with RMS. Six questions used a scale of 1 to 10 (1=strongly disagree; 10=strongly agree), and the remaining three questions solicited a "yes" or "no" response. RESULTS: 100 patients were studied (59% Caucasians, 40% African Americans, and 1% Hispanic). Median age was 63 years. The highest level of education was middle school in 2% of patients, high school in 55%, undergraduate in 33%, and postgraduate in 10%. Patients scored a mean of 9.50/10 (highly satisfactory) regarding their comfort with RMS; 96% scored ≥ 7, 4% scored 5 to 6, and none scored <5. Patients were satisfied having a urology resident perform the procedure (9.48/10), other residents and medical students watch the procedure (9.41/10), a video camera in the room (9.40/10), and two-way sound communication (9.40/10). None perceived compromise to their privacy or quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: RMS in IES is highly acceptable to patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. RMS has the potential to positively impact residency training, efficiency, regulatory compliance, safety, and productivity.
PURPOSE: To report on integrated endourology suites (IES), remote monitoring and supervision (RMS) of urology residents and to evaluate patients' opinions, acceptance, and satisfaction level with IES and RMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy in the IES with RMS were surveyed using a questionnaire. All procedures were performed by junior urology residents (UR-1 level) using RMS. Patients were studied using a nine-question survey to evaluate their comfort level, acceptance, and level of satisfaction with RMS. Six questions used a scale of 1 to 10 (1=strongly disagree; 10=strongly agree), and the remaining three questions solicited a "yes" or "no" response. RESULTS: 100 patients were studied (59% Caucasians, 40% African Americans, and 1% Hispanic). Median age was 63 years. The highest level of education was middle school in 2% of patients, high school in 55%, undergraduate in 33%, and postgraduate in 10%. Patients scored a mean of 9.50/10 (highly satisfactory) regarding their comfort with RMS; 96% scored ≥ 7, 4% scored 5 to 6, and none scored <5. Patients were satisfied having a urology resident perform the procedure (9.48/10), other residents and medical students watch the procedure (9.41/10), a video camera in the room (9.40/10), and two-way sound communication (9.40/10). None perceived compromise to their privacy or quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: RMS in IES is highly acceptable to patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. RMS has the potential to positively impact residency training, efficiency, regulatory compliance, safety, and productivity.
Authors: Emre Huri; Andreas Skolarikos; İlkan Tatar; Murat Binbay; Mustafa Sofikerim; Emrah Yuruk; Tolga Karakan; Mustafa Sargon; Deniz Demiryurek; Roberto Miano; Murat Bagcioglu; Mehmet Ezer; Cecilia Maria Cracco; Cesare Marco Scoffone Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 4.226