Literature DB >> 22904964

5-Amino-3-methyl-1,2-oxazole-4-carbonitrile.

Samad Shoghpour, Amir Keykha, Hadi Amiri Rudbari, Mohammad Rahimizadeh, Mehdi Bakavoli, Mehrdad Pourayoubi, Francesco Nicolò.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(5)H(5)N(3)O, the isoxazole ring is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.007 (1) Å from the least-squares plane. The N atom of the amine group exhibits sp(2) character (sum of bond angles around this atom = 358°). In the crystal, mol-ecules are aggregated by two kinds of N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds into fused R(2) (2)(12) and R(6) (6)(26) rings, forming a slightly puckered two-dimensional array lying parallel to (101).

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22904964      PMCID: PMC3414977          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activities of isoxazole derivatives, see: Mantegani et al. (2011 ▶); Ali et al. (2011 ▶); Panda et al. (2009 ▶); Özdemir et al. (2007 ▶); Banerjee et al. (1994 ▶); Makoto et al. (2011 ▶). For background to push–pull nitriles, see: Ziao et al. (2001 ▶); Hao et al. (2005 ▶). For hydrogen-bond motif definitions, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H5N3O M = 123.12 Monoclinic, a = 3.8779 (2) Å b = 18.8518 (11) Å c = 8.2015 (4) Å β = 100.780 (2)° V = 588.99 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.56 × 0.26 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.674, T max = 0.745 5275 measured reflections 1277 independent reflections 1072 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.020

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.107 S = 1.07 1277 reflections 91 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XPW (Siemens, 1996 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032667/gk2513sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032667/gk2513Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032667/gk2513Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H5N3OF(000) = 256
Mr = 123.12Dx = 1.388 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2187 reflections
a = 3.8779 (2) Åθ = 2.8–26.2°
b = 18.8518 (11) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 8.2015 (4) ÅT = 296 K
β = 100.780 (2)°Irregular, colourless
V = 588.99 (5) Å30.56 × 0.26 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1277 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1072 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.020
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.674, Tmax = 0.745k = −24→23
5275 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.107H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0631P)2 + 0.0596P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1277 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.8940 (2)0.77984 (4)0.37710 (11)0.0430 (3)
C20.8212 (3)0.89315 (6)0.30725 (13)0.0343 (3)
N10.9900 (3)0.78822 (6)0.21727 (13)0.0454 (3)
N20.6888 (4)0.84546 (6)0.57048 (14)0.0463 (3)
N30.6449 (4)1.02356 (6)0.30830 (16)0.0577 (4)
C40.7269 (3)0.96534 (6)0.30883 (14)0.0384 (3)
C30.9420 (3)0.85487 (7)0.17972 (14)0.0381 (3)
C51.0051 (4)0.88260 (8)0.01801 (16)0.0518 (4)
H5A1.10580.8459−0.03940.078*
H5B1.16370.92210.03720.078*
H5C0.78660.8977−0.04820.078*
C10.7919 (3)0.84280 (6)0.42663 (14)0.0347 (3)
H2A0.647 (4)0.8074 (10)0.617 (2)0.063 (5)*
H2B0.610 (4)0.8842 (10)0.608 (2)0.061 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0636 (6)0.0243 (4)0.0437 (5)0.0043 (4)0.0167 (4)−0.0011 (3)
C20.0426 (6)0.0264 (6)0.0346 (6)0.0016 (4)0.0092 (5)−0.0006 (4)
N10.0611 (7)0.0367 (6)0.0413 (6)0.0057 (5)0.0168 (5)−0.0060 (4)
N20.0752 (8)0.0257 (6)0.0434 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0256 (6)0.0023 (4)
N30.0844 (10)0.0318 (6)0.0616 (8)0.0114 (6)0.0260 (7)0.0054 (5)
C40.0504 (7)0.0306 (7)0.0367 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0145 (5)0.0021 (4)
C30.0420 (6)0.0358 (6)0.0369 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0083 (5)−0.0038 (5)
C50.0622 (8)0.0581 (9)0.0384 (7)0.0072 (7)0.0180 (6)0.0027 (6)
C10.0440 (6)0.0237 (6)0.0369 (6)−0.0003 (4)0.0090 (5)−0.0026 (4)
O1—C11.3383 (13)N2—H2A0.842 (19)
O1—N11.4367 (13)N2—H2B0.870 (18)
C2—C11.3836 (16)N3—C41.1424 (16)
C2—C41.4098 (16)C3—C51.4877 (17)
C2—C31.4204 (16)C5—H5A0.9600
N1—C31.2988 (16)C5—H5B0.9600
N2—C11.3154 (16)C5—H5C0.9600
C1—O1—N1108.74 (8)C2—C3—C5127.57 (12)
C1—C2—C4126.86 (10)C3—C5—H5A109.5
C1—C2—C3104.75 (10)C3—C5—H5B109.5
C4—C2—C3128.25 (11)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C3—N1—O1105.83 (9)C3—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N2—H2A119.3 (12)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N2—H2B122.4 (11)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
H2A—N2—H2B116.3 (16)N2—C1—O1117.57 (10)
N3—C4—C2178.79 (15)N2—C1—C2133.44 (11)
N1—C3—C2111.67 (11)O1—C1—C2109.00 (10)
N1—C3—C5120.74 (11)
C1—O1—N1—C30.14 (14)N1—O1—C1—N2179.10 (11)
O1—N1—C3—C20.70 (14)N1—O1—C1—C2−0.94 (13)
O1—N1—C3—C5−178.01 (10)C4—C2—C1—N2−2.8 (2)
C1—C2—C3—N1−1.26 (14)C3—C2—C1—N2−178.75 (15)
C4—C2—C3—N1−177.17 (12)C4—C2—C1—O1177.29 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C5177.35 (12)C3—C2—C1—O11.31 (13)
C4—C2—C3—C51.4 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···N1i0.842 (19)2.118 (19)2.9567 (16)174.2 (16)
N2—H2B···N3ii0.870 (18)2.174 (18)3.0402 (17)173.8 (15)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯N1i 0.842 (19)2.118 (19)2.9567 (16)174.2 (16)
N2—H2B⋯N3ii 0.870 (18)2.174 (18)3.0402 (17)173.8 (15)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  7 in total

1.  A helical structure with Z' = 10.

Authors:  Xiang Hao; Jing Chen; Arthur Cammers; Sean Parkin; Carolyn Pratt Brock
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2005-03-16

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Amino and cyano N atoms in competitive situations: which is the best hydrogen-bond acceptor? A crystallographic database investigation.

Authors:  N Ziao; J Graton; C Laurence; J Y Le Questel
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2001-11-29

4.  Synthesis and studies on antidepressant and anticonvulsant activities of some 3-(2-furyl)-pyrazoline derivatives.

Authors:  Zuhal Ozdemir; H Burak Kandilci; Bülent Gümüşel; Unsal Caliş; A Altan Bilgin
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Synthesis and anti-HIV activity of novel 3-substituted phenyl-6,7-dimethoxy-3a,4-dihydro-3H-indeno[1,2-c]isoxazole analogues.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ali; Rusli Ismail; Tan S Choon; Yeong K Yoon; Ang C Wei; Suresh Pandian; Jeyabalan G Samy; Eric De Clercq; Christophe Pannecouque
Journal:  Acta Pol Pharm       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.330

6.  Synthesis, Antiinflammatory and Antibacterial Activity of Novel Indolyl-isoxazoles.

Authors:  S S Panda; P V R Chowdary; B S Jayashree
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.975

7.  Synthesis and anthelmintic activity of 3-substituted 5-methylthio-isoxazoles.

Authors:  A K Banerjee; S Bandyopadhyay; A K Gayen; T Sengupta; A K Das; G K Chatterjee; S K Chaudhuri
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1994-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.