Literature DB >> 22904157

A time course investigation of the statin paradox among valvular interstitial cell phenotypes.

Elyssa L Monzack1, Kristyn S Masters.   

Abstract

Statin drugs are prescribed primarily for their ability to lower cholesterol, but may also exert beneficial side effects unrelated to cholesterol metabolism. Previous work has described a "statin paradox," where statin treatment decreased osteoblastic markers in valve myofibroblasts while increasing those same markers in preosteoblasts. However, valvular interstitial cells (VICs) themselves are a multipotent cell type, capable of differentiating into activated, myofibroblastic VICs (aVICs) and osteoblastic VICs (obVICs), motivating the question of whether the statin paradox can exist within an individual valve containing these phenotypically distinct VIC subpopulations. In the current study, a heterogeneous initial population of porcine VICs was differentiated into aVICs or obVICs and treated with simvastatin. Gene expression analysis was conducted daily over an 8-day time course to capture temporally dynamic changes in cell phenotype induced by statin treatment. These studies demonstrated that the two VIC populations, aVICs and obVICs, exhibited differential responses to statin treatment. Specifically, simvastatin increased the expression of osteoblastic markers in obVICs, but not in aVICs, while also suppressing the myofibroblastic phenotype in both aVICs and obVICs. These results indicate that the statin paradox can exist within the heterogeneous VIC population of an individual diseased valve and that statin efficacy in the context of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) may be dependent upon the cellular composition of the valve. These findings may have implications for clinical usage of statins, shedding light on how statin efficacy in CAVD may be dependent upon the disease stage or why some individuals exhibit better responsiveness to statin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22904157      PMCID: PMC3469700          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00263.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  27 in total

Review 1.  The cardiac valve interstitial cell.

Authors:  Patricia M Taylor; Puspa Batten; Nigel J Brand; Penny S Thomas; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 2.  Calcific aortic valve disease: not simply a degenerative process: A review and agenda for research from the National Heart and Lung and Blood Institute Aortic Stenosis Working Group. Executive summary: Calcific aortic valve disease-2011 update.

Authors:  Nalini M Rajamannan; Frank J Evans; Elena Aikawa; K Jane Grande-Allen; Linda L Demer; Donald D Heistad; Craig A Simmons; Kristyn S Masters; Patrick Mathieu; Kevin D O'Brien; Frederick J Schoen; Dwight A Towler; Ajit P Yoganathan; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix.

Authors:  T A Owen; M Aronow; V Shalhoub; L M Barone; L Wilming; M S Tassinari; M B Kennedy; S Pockwinse; J B Lian; G S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Paradoxical effects of statins on aortic valve myofibroblasts and osteoblasts: implications for end-stage valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Sammy Elmariah; Frederick S Kaplan; Guanjun Cheng; Emile R Mohler
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 5.  Osteocalcin gene promoter: unlocking the secrets for regulation of osteoblast growth and differentiation.

Authors:  J B Lian; G S Stein; J L Stein; A J van Wijnen
Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl       Date:  1998

6.  Porcine cardiac valvular subendothelial cells in culture: cell isolation and growth characteristics.

Authors:  C M Johnson; M N Hanson; S C Helgeson
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.000

7.  In situ hybridization to show sequential expression of osteoblast gene markers during bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  H Zhou; P Choong; R McCarthy; S T Chou; T J Martin; K W Ng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Characterization of the early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies.

Authors:  C M Otto; J Kuusisto; D D Reichenbach; A M Gown; K D O'Brien
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Valvular myofibroblast activation by transforming growth factor-beta: implications for pathological extracellular matrix remodeling in heart valve disease.

Authors:  Gennyne A Walker; Kristyn S Masters; Darshita N Shah; Kristi S Anseth; Leslie A Leinwand
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Simvastatin increases bone mineral density in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Graziana Lupattelli; Anna Maria Scarponi; Gaetano Vaudo; Donatella Siepi; Anna Rita Roscini; Fabio Gemelli; Matteo Pirro; Roberto A Latini; Helmut Sinzinger; Simona Marchesi; Elmo Mannarino
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.694

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Potential drug targets for calcific aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Joshua D Hutcheson; Elena Aikawa; W David Merryman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  OxLDL-derived lysophosphatidic acid promotes the progression of aortic valve stenosis through a LPAR1-RhoA-NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Mohamed Jalloul Nsaibia; Marie-Chloé Boulanger; Rihab Bouchareb; Ghada Mkannez; Khai Le Quang; Fayez Hadji; Deborah Argaud; Abdellaziz Dahou; Yohan Bossé; Marlys L Koschinsky; Philippe Pibarot; Benoit J Arsenault; André Marette; Patrick Mathieu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 3.  Valve Interstitial Cells: The Key to Understanding the Pathophysiology of Heart Valve Calcification.

Authors:  Arkady Rutkovskiy; Anna Malashicheva; Gareth Sullivan; Maria Bogdanova; Anna Kostareva; Kåre-Olav Stensløkken; Arnt Fiane; Jarle Vaage
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Robust Generation of Quiescent Porcine Valvular Interstitial Cell Cultures.

Authors:  Ana M Porras; Nicole C A van Engeland; Evelyn Marchbanks; Ann McCormack; Carlijn V C Bouten; Magdi H Yacoub; Najma Latif; Kristyn S Masters
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Label-free metabolic biomarkers for assessing valve interstitial cell calcific progression.

Authors:  Ishita Tandon; Olivia I Kolenc; Delaney Cross; Isaac Vargas; Shelby Johns; Kyle P Quinn; Kartik Balachandran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The Genetic Regulation of Aortic Valve Development and Calcific Disease.

Authors:  Vinal Menon; Joy Lincoln
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-11-06

Review 7.  Dissecting Calcific Aortic Valve Disease-The Role, Etiology, and Drivers of Valvular Fibrosis.

Authors:  Petra Büttner; Lukas Feistner; Philipp Lurz; Holger Thiele; Joshua D Hutcheson; Florian Schlotter
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-10

8.  The billion cell construct: will three-dimensional printing get us there?

Authors:  Jordan S Miller
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on Pharmacological Treatment of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Maristella Donato; Nicola Ferri; Maria Giovanna Lupo; Elisabetta Faggin; Marcello Rattazzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.