OBJECTIVES: Although there has been increased interest in applying attachment theory to the psychological understanding of psychosis, research to date has focused on self-reported attachment and psychotic symptomatology. This study presents evidence for applying attachment and mentalization constructs to understanding engagement and adaptation to first-episode psychosis (FEP), using a narrative based interview. DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort design was used. METHODS: Thirty-four individuals with a first episode of psychosis were interviewed using the Adult Attachment Interview. Attachment classifications and reflective function scores were derived from the interview. Psychotic symptomatology, premorbid adjustment, duration of untreated psychosis, and psychological variables were also measured. RESULTS: Attachment distribution was heterogeneous in the sample, although the majority of participants were classified dismissing of attachment. Mentalization scores were consistent with previous clinical samples. Attachment and mentalization were unrelated to psychotic symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates, albeit with a small clinical sample, the importance of assessing attachment and mentalization via narrative methods. The findings also have clinical implications for understanding the process of engagement and adaptation in FEP.
OBJECTIVES: Although there has been increased interest in applying attachment theory to the psychological understanding of psychosis, research to date has focused on self-reported attachment and psychotic symptomatology. This study presents evidence for applying attachment and mentalization constructs to understanding engagement and adaptation to first-episode psychosis (FEP), using a narrative based interview. DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort design was used. METHODS: Thirty-four individuals with a first episode of psychosis were interviewed using the Adult Attachment Interview. Attachment classifications and reflective function scores were derived from the interview. Psychotic symptomatology, premorbid adjustment, duration of untreated psychosis, and psychological variables were also measured. RESULTS: Attachment distribution was heterogeneous in the sample, although the majority of participants were classified dismissing of attachment. Mentalization scores were consistent with previous clinical samples. Attachment and mentalization were unrelated to psychotic symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates, albeit with a small clinical sample, the importance of assessing attachment and mentalization via narrative methods. The findings also have clinical implications for understanding the process of engagement and adaptation in FEP.
Authors: Helen J Stain; Kolbjørn Brønnick; Wenche T V Hegelstad; Inge Joa; Jan O Johannessen; Johannes Langeveld; Lauren Mawn; Tor K Larsen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Christiane Montag; Laura Haase; Dorothea Seidel; Martin Bayerl; Jürgen Gallinat; Uwe Herrmann; Karin Dannecker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin Debbané; George Salaminios; Patrick Luyten; Deborah Badoud; Marco Armando; Alessandra Solida Tozzi; Peter Fonagy; Benjamin K Brent Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 3.169