Literature DB >> 22903825

Sumas Mountain chrysotile induces greater lung fibrosis in Fischer344 rats than Libby amphibole, El Dorado tremolite, and Ontario ferroactinolite.

Jaime M Cyphert1, Abraham Nyska, Ron K Mahoney, Mette C Schladweiler, Urmila P Kodavanti, Stephen H Gavett.   

Abstract

The physical properties of different types of asbestos may strongly affect health outcomes in exposed individuals. This study was designed to provide understanding of the comparative toxicity of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) fibers including Libby amphibole (LA), Sumas Mountain chrysotile (SM), El Dorado tremolite (ED), and Ontario ferroactinolite (ON) cleavage fragments. Rat-respirable fractions (PM₂.₅) were prepared by water elutriation. Surface area was greater for SM (64.1 m²/g) than all other samples (range: 14.1-16.2 m²/g), whereas mean lengths and aspect ratios (ARs) for LA and SM were comparable and greater than ED and ON. Samples were delivered via a single intratracheal (IT) instillation at doses of 0.5 and 1.5mg/rat. One day post-IT instillation, low-dose NOA exposure resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cellularity compared with dispersion media (DM) controls, whereas high-dose exposure had a more severe effect on lung inflammation which varied by source. Although inducing less neutrophilic inflammation than ON and ED, exposure to either LA or SM resulted in a greater degree of acute lung injury. Three months post-IT instillation, most BALF parameters had returned to control levels, whereas the development of fibrosis persisted and was greatest in SM-exposed rats (SM > LA > ON > ED). These data demonstrate that fiber length and higher AR are directly correlated with the severity of fibrosis and that, in the rat, exposure to SM is more fibrogenic than LA which suggests that there may be cause for concern for people at risk of being exposed to NOA from the Sumas Mountain landslide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903825     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of autoantibody profiles in two asbestiform fiber exposure cohorts.

Authors:  Jean C Pfau; Christopher Barbour; Brad Black; Kinta M Serve; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2018-09-19

Review 2.  Autoimmunity and asbestos exposure.

Authors:  Jean C Pfau; Kinta M Serve; Curtis W Noonan
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2014-04-29

3.  Persistent effects of Libby amphibole and amosite asbestos following subchronic inhalation in rats.

Authors:  Stephen H Gavett; Carl U Parkinson; Gabrielle A Willson; Charles E Wood; Annie M Jarabek; Kay C Roberts; Urmila P Kodavanti; Darol E Dodd
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 9.400

4.  Current Research and Opportunities to Address Environmental Asbestos Exposures.

Authors:  Danielle J Carlin; Theodore C Larson; Jean C Pfau; Stephen H Gavett; Arti Shukla; Aubrey Miller; Ronald Hines
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Consensus Report of the 2015 Weinman International Conference on Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Michele Carbone; Shreya Kanodia; Ann Chao; Aubrey Miller; Anil Wali; David Weissman; Alex Adjei; Francine Baumann; Paolo Boffetta; Brenda Buck; Marc de Perrot; A Umran Dogan; Steve Gavett; Alessandro Gualtieri; Raffit Hassan; Mary Hesdorffer; Fred R Hirsch; David Larson; Weimin Mao; Scott Masten; Harvey I Pass; Julian Peto; Enrico Pira; Ian Steele; Anne Tsao; Gavitt Alida Woodard; Haining Yang; Shakun Malik
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Integration of Evidence on Community Cancer Risks from Elongate Mineral Particles in Silver Bay, Minnesota.

Authors:  Linda D Dell; Alexa E Gallagher; Lisa J Yost; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.