Literature DB >> 22903741

Usefulness of coronary calcium scoring to myocardial perfusion SPECT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in a predominantly high risk population.

Jeroen Schaap1, Robert M Kauling, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Martijn C Post, Jan A Van der Heyden, Thom L de Kroon, H Wouter van Es, Benno J W M Rensing, J Fred Verzijlbergen.   

Abstract

Coronary calcium scoring (CCS) adds to the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with a high pre-test likelihood are expected to have a high CCS which potentially could enhance the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion SPECT in this specific patient group. We evaluated the added value of CCS to SPECT in the diagnosis of significant CAD in patients with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood. In total, 129 patients (mean age 62.7 ± 9.7 years, 65 % male) with stable anginal complaints and intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of CAD (median 87 %, range 22-95) were prospectively included in this study. All patients received SPECT and CCS imaging preceding invasive coronary angiography (CA). Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements were acquired from patients with angiographically estimated 50-95 % obstructive CAD. For SPECT a SSS > 3 was defined significant CAD. For CCS the optimal cut-off value for significant CAD was determined by ROC curve analysis. The reference standard for significant CAD was a FFR of <0.80 acquired by CA. Significant CAD was demonstrated in 64 patients (49.6 %). Optimal CCS cut-off value for significant CAD was >182.5. ROC curve analysis for prediction of the presence of significant CAD for SPECT, CCS and the combination of CCS and SPECT resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95 % CI 81-94), 0.75 (95 % CI 66-83 %) and 0.92 (95 % CI 87-97 %) respectively. The difference of the AUC between SPECT and the combination of CCS and SPECT was 0.05 (P = 0.12). The addition of CCS did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance of SPECT in the evaluation of patients with a predominantly high pre-test likelihood of CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903741     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0118-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

1.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  William Wijns; Philippe Kolh; Nicolas Danchin; Carlo Di Mario; Volkmar Falk; Thierry Folliguet; Scot Garg; Kurt Huber; Stefan James; Juhani Knuuti; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Jean Marco; Lorenzo Menicanti; Miodrag Ostojic; Massimo F Piepoli; Charles Pirlet; Jose L Pomar; Nicolaus Reifart; Flavio L Ribichini; Martin J Schalij; Paul Sergeant; Patrick W Serruys; Sigmund Silber; Miguel Sousa Uva; David Taggart
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Julie M Miller; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Melvin E Clouse; Leonardo Sara; Hiroyuki Niinuma; David E Bush; Narinder Paul; Andrea L Vavere; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima; Carlos E Rochitte
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  G A Diamond; J S Forrester
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification in patients with stable chest symptoms.

Authors:  D Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen; D Kuijpers; P R M van Dijkman
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.

Authors:  Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Susanne Moebus; Axel Schmermund; Nils Lehmann; Andreas Stang; Nico Dragano; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Rainer Seibel; Hagen Kälsch; Martina Bröcker-Preuss; Klaus Mann; Johannes Siegrist; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Adnan Kastrati; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.

Authors:  Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence.

Authors:  S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Relationship between Calcium Score and Myocardial Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Fabio Paiva Rossini Siqueira; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita; Alair Augusto Sarmet M Damas Dos Santos; Marcelo Souto Nacif
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Association between epicardial adipose tissue and adverse outcomes in coronary heart disease patients with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Changqing Lu; Helei Jia; Zhentao Wang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  A head-to-head comparison of the coronary calcium score by computed tomography with myocardial perfusion imaging in predicting coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mansour Almoudi; Zhong-Hua Sun
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.