Literature DB >> 22903273

Physical activity and risk of breast cancer overall and by hormone receptor status: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition.

Karen Steindorf1, Rebecca Ritte, Piia-Piret Eomois, Annekatrin Lukanova, Anne Tjonneland, Nina Føns Johnsen, Kim Overvad, Jane Nautrup Østergaard, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Agnès Fournier, Laure Dossus, Birgit Teucher, Sabine Rohrmann, Heiner Boeing, Angelika Wientzek, Antonia Trichopoulou, Tina Karapetyan, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Giovanna Masala, Franco Berrino, Amalia Mattiello, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, J Ramón Quirós, Noémie Travier, María-José Sánchez, Carmen Navarro, Eva Ardanaz, Pilar Amiano, H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita, Franzel van Duijnhoven, Evelyn Monninkhof, Anne M May, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nick Wareham, Tim J Key, Ruth C Travis, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, Malin Sund, Anne Andersson, Veronika Fedirko, Sabina Rinaldi, Isabelle Romieu, Jürgen Wahrendorf, Elio Riboli, Rudolf Kaaks.   

Abstract

Physical activity is associated with reduced risks of invasive breast cancer. However, whether this holds true for breast cancer subtypes defined by the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) status is controversial. The study included 257,805 women from the multinational EPIC-cohort study with detailed information on occupational, recreational and household physical activity and important cofactors assessed at baseline. During 11.6 years of median follow-up, 8,034 incident invasive breast cancer cases were identified. Data on ER, PR and combined ER/PR expression were available for 6,007 (67.6%), 4,814 (54.2%) and 4,798 (53.9%) cases, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by proportional hazards models. Breast cancer risk was inversely associated with moderate and high levels of total physical activity (HR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.99, HR = 0.87, 95%-CI: 0.79-0.97, respectively; p-trend = 0.002), compared to the lowest quartile. Among women diagnosed with breast cancer after age 50, the largest risk reduction was found with highest activity (HR = 0.86, 95%-CI: 0.77-0.97), whereas for cancers diagnosed before age 50 strongest associations were found for moderate total physical activity (HR = 0.78, 95%-CI: 0.64-0.94). Analyses by hormone receptor status suggested differential associations for total physical activity (p-heterogeneity = 0.04), with a somewhat stronger inverse relationship for ER+/PR+ breast tumors, primarily driven by PR+ tumors (p-heterogeneity < 0.01). Household physical activity was inversely associated with ER-/PR- tumors. The results of this largest prospective study on the protective effects of physical activity indicate that moderate and high physical activity are associated with modest decreased breast cancer risk. Heterogeneities by receptor status indicate hormone-related mechanisms.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903273     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  18 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk prediction: an update to the Rosner-Colditz breast cancer incidence model.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Walter C Willett; Graham Colditz; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Atti Le giornate della ricerca scientificae delle esperienze professionali dei giovani: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI) Roma 20-21 dicembre 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2020-02-13

3.  Adult body size and physical activity in relation to risk of breast cancer according to tumor androgen receptor status.

Authors:  Xuehong Zhang; A Heather Eliassen; Rulla M Tamimi; Aditi Hazra; Andrew H Beck; Myles Brown; Laura C Collins; Bernard Rosner; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Adherence to diet, physical activity and body weight recommendations and breast cancer incidence in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Sarah J O Nomura; Chiranjeev Dash; Lynn Rosenberg; Jeffrey Yu; Julie R Palmer; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  A prospective study of occupational physical activity and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Christine C Ekenga; Christine G Parks; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Body mass index and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Linda S Cook; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Peggy L Porter; Deirdre A Hill; Charles L Wiggins; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Vigorous physical activity and risk of breast cancer in the African American breast cancer epidemiology and risk consortium.

Authors:  Zhihong Gong; Chi-Chen Hong; Elisa V Bandera; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Melissa A Troester; Song-Yi Park; Kathryn A McInerney; Gary Zirpoli; Andrew F Olshan; Julie R Palmer; Christine B Ambrosone; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Prevalent diabetes and risk of total, colorectal, prostate and breast cancers in an ageing population: meta-analysis of individual participant data from cohorts of the CHANCES consortium.

Authors:  Amina Amadou; Heinz Freisling; Mazda Jenab; Konstantinos K Tsilidis; Antonia Trichopoulou; Paolo Boffetta; Bethany Van Guelpen; Olatz Mokoroa; Tom Wilsgaard; Frank Kee; Ben Schöttker; José M Ordóñez-Mena; Satu Männistö; Stefan Söderberg; Roel C H Vermeulen; J Ramón Quirós; Linda M Liao; Rashmi Sinha; Kari Kuulasmaa; Hermann Brenner; Isabelle Romieu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults.

Authors:  Steven C Moore; I-Min Lee; Elisabete Weiderpass; Peter T Campbell; Joshua N Sampson; Cari M Kitahara; Sarah K Keadle; Hannah Arem; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; Hans-Olov Adami; Cindy K Blair; Kristin B Borch; Eric Boyd; David P Check; Agnès Fournier; Neal D Freedman; Marc Gunter; Mattias Johannson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Martha S Linet; Nicola Orsini; Yikyung Park; Elio Riboli; Kim Robien; Catherine Schairer; Howard Sesso; Michael Spriggs; Roy Van Dusen; Alicja Wolk; Charles E Matthews; Alpa V Patel
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jongin Lee; JaeYong Lee; Dong-Wook Lee; Hyoung-Ryoul Kim; Mo-Yeol Kang
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.