Literature DB >> 22902942

Efficacy of linezolid-based salvage therapy compared with glycopeptide-based therapy in patients with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Hyun Jung Park1, Sung-Han Kim, Min-Ju Kim, Yu-Mi Lee, So-Youn Park, Song Mi Moon, Ki-Ho Park, Yong Pil Chong, Sang-Oh Lee, Sang-Ho Choi, Jun Hee Woo, Yang Soo Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of linezolid-based salvage therapy compared with glycopeptide-based therapy in patients with persistent (≥7 days) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B).
METHODS: All patients with MRSA-B during 2-year period at a tertiary-care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Linezolid-based salvage therapy was classified if patients switched glycopeptides to linezolid with/without carbapenem due to persistent MRSA-B. Covariate adjustment using the propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score were performed to control for bias in treatment assignment.
RESULTS: Of 377 patients with MRSA-B, 90 with persistent MRSA-B were included. Of these, 38 (42%) were classified as linezolid-based salvage group and the remaining 52 (58%) as glycopeptide-based therapy group. The duration of persistent bacteremia (median 16 days vs. 10 days; P = 0.008) was longer in linezolid-based salvage group than in the comparator. However, the 30-day mortality (11% vs. 25%; P = 0.08) had a trend toward being lower in linezolid-based salvage group than those in the comparator. Logistic regression models with covariate adjustment and IPTW using propensity scores also revealed that linezolid-based salvage showed a trend toward having better outcome than the comparator, although this did not reach any statistically significance (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.03-2.95 and OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.01-3.39, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: While having worse prognostic factors compared with glycopeptide-based therapy, linezolid-based salvage therapy revealed a trend toward better outcomes than the comparator. Our data suggest that linezolid-based salvage therapy would be considered in patients with persistent MRSA-B despite the use of glycopeptides therapy.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902942     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review.

Authors:  Thomas L Holland; Christopher Arnold; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Treatment duration for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia to prevent relapse: analysis of a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Yong Pil Chong; Song Mi Moon; Kyung-Mi Bang; Hyun Jung Park; So-Youn Park; Mi-Na Kim; Ki-Ho Park; Sung-Han Kim; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Jin-Yong Jeong; Jun Hee Woo; Yang Soo Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Impact of Time to Appropriate Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Infection.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; C A Burnham; David K Warren; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multicenter prospective observational study of the comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin in patients with health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Young Kyung Yoon; Dae Won Park; Jang Wook Sohn; Hyo Youl Kim; Yeon-Sook Kim; Chang-Seop Lee; Mi Suk Lee; Seong-Yeol Ryu; Hee-Chang Jang; Young Ju Choi; Cheol-In Kang; Hee Jung Choi; Seung Soon Lee; Shin Woo Kim; Sang Il Kim; Eu Suk Kim; Jeong Yeon Kim; Kyung Sook Yang; Kyong Ran Peck; Min Ja Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  An evidence-based review of linezolid for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): place in therapy.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins; Tracy L Lemonovich; Thomas M File
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2012-12-11

Review 6.  Treatment of Gram-positive infections in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 7.  Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Eun Ju Choo; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations-a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment.

Authors:  Ali Hassoun; Peter K Linden; Bruce Friedman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Septic Thrombophlebitis with Persistent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia and de Novo Resistance to Vancomycin and Daptomycin.

Authors:  Yael Koton; Zafrir Or; Naiel Bisharat
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-05-31

10.  Persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: do we need a new therapeutic strategy?

Authors:  Cheol-In Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.884

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.