Literature DB >> 22902922

Brain maturation: predicting individual BrainAGE in children and adolescents using structural MRI.

Katja Franke1, Eileen Luders, Arne May, Marko Wilke, Christian Gaser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neural development during human childhood and adolescence involves highly coordinated and sequenced events, characterized by both progressive and regressive processes. Despite a multitude of results demonstrating the age-dependent development of gray matter, white matter, and total brain volume, a reference curve allowing prediction of structural brain maturation is still lacking but would be clinically valuable. For the first time, the present study provides a validated reference curve for structural brain maturation during childhood and adolescence, based on structural MRI data. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: By employing kernel regression methods, a novel but well-validated BrainAGE framework uses the complex multidimensional maturation pattern across the whole brain to estimate an individual's brain age. The BrainAGE framework was applied to a large human sample (n=394) of healthy children and adolescents, whose image data had been acquired during the NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Using this approach, we were able to predict individual brain maturation with a clinically meaningful accuracy: the correlation between predicted brain age and chronological age resulted in r=0.93. The mean absolute error was only 1.1 years. Moreover, the predicted brain age reliably differentiated between all age groups (i.e., preschool childhood, late childhood, early adolescence, middle adolescence, late adolescence). Applying the framework to preterm-born adolescents resulted in a significantly lower estimated brain age than chronological age in subjects who were born before the end of the 27th week of gestation, demonstrating the successful clinical application and future potential of this method.
CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, in the future this novel BrainAGE approach may prove clinically valuable in detecting both normal and abnormal brain maturation, providing important prognostic information.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902922     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  74 in total

1.  Regional analysis of the magnetization transfer ratio of the brain in mild Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  M Mascalchi; A Ginestroni; V Bessi; N Toschi; S Padiglioni; S Ciulli; C Tessa; M Giannelli; L Bracco; S Diciotti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Daniel H Wolf; Guray Erus; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Efstathios D Gennatas; Ryan Hopson; Chad Jackson; Karthik Prabhakaran; Warren B Bilker; Monica E Calkins; James Loughead; Alex Smith; David R Roalf; Hakon Hakonarson; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Benson Mwangi; Tian Siva Tian; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-04

4.  Accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia and beyond: a neuroanatomical marker of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Christos Davatzikos; Stefan Borgwardt; Christian Gaser; Ronald Bottlender; Thomas Frodl; Peter Falkai; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Maximilian Reiser; Christos Pantelis; Eva Meisenzahl
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Charting shared developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and structural connectivity in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Gareth Ball; Richard Beare; Marc L Seal
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Investigating systematic bias in brain age estimation with application to post-traumatic stress disorders.

Authors:  Hualou Liang; Fengqing Zhang; Xin Niu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Age prediction on the basis of brain anatomical measures.

Authors:  S A Valizadeh; J Hänggi; S Mérillat; L Jäncke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Evaluating the Prediction of Brain Maturity From Functional Connectivity After Motion Artifact Denoising.

Authors:  Ashley N Nielsen; Deanna J Greene; Caterina Gratton; Nico U F Dosenbach; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  EEG-based age-prediction models as stable and heritable indicators of brain maturational level in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Marjolein M L J Z Vandenbosch; Dennis van 't Ent; Dorret I Boomsma; Andrey P Anokhin; Dirk J A Smit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Finding imaging patterns of structural covariance via Non-Negative Matrix Factorization.

Authors:  Aristeidis Sotiras; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.