Literature DB >> 22902872

(In)accuracy of blood pressure measurement in 14 Italian hospitals.

Lamberto Manzoli1, Valentina Simonetti, Marcello M D'Errico, Corrado De Vito, Maria Elena Flacco, Cristiana Forni, Giuseppe La Torre, Giorgio Liguori, Gabriele Messina, Andrea Mezzetti, Massimiliano Panella, Carmine Pizzi, Roberta Siliquini, Paolo Villari, Giancarlo Cicolini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis and control of hypertension depend on accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP). The literature on the accuracy of BP recording by health professionals is, however, limited, and no study directly interviewed patients in the hospital setting. This multicenter cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating the compliance to current recommendations on BP measurement by health professionals directly from patients and to investigate potential predictors of higher quality in BP recording.
METHODS: A trained nurse interviewed a random sample of adult patients hospitalized for an ordinary admission (except in the emergency room) lasting more than one night, without mental disorder, who had their BP routinely measured by the hospital personnel less than 3  h before. The questionnaire contained 15 items on the main procedures that are common to current guidelines.
RESULTS: Fourteen public hospitals from seven regions of Italy participated, and 1334 questionnaires were collected. Nine of the recommended practices were followed in the majority (>70%) of BP recordings, whereas some others were infrequent or rare: in 98.6, 82.2 and 81.1% of the participants, respectively, the arm circumference was never recorded, BP was measured only once, and BP was never recorded in both arms. Overall, 10 or more recommended procedures were followed during 33.4% recordings. At multivariate analysis, physicians were less likely than nurses to provide a more accurate BP measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: The operator's compliance to some recommendations in BP measurement is unacceptably low. This survey provides detailed indications for medical directors on the procedures and settings to prioritize in educational programs, which are definitely needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902872     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283577b20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  15 in total

1.  The impact of multiple single day blood pressure readings on cardiovascular risk estimation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.

Authors:  Abayomi N Ogunwale; Alanna C Morrison; Wensheng Sun; Rhiannon C Dodge; Salim S Virani; Addison Taylor; Rebecca F Gottesman; Eric Yang; Peng Wei; John W McEvoy; Gerardo Heiss; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie M Ballantyne; Vijay Nambi
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.804

2.  Dementia and in-hospital mortality: retrospective analysis of a nationwide administrative database of elderly subjects in Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Zuliani; Massimo Gallerani; Cecilia Acuti Martellucci; Roberto Reverberi; Gloria Brombo; Carlo Cervellati; Marco Zuin; Chiara Pistolesi; Dario Pedrini; Maria Elena Flacco; Lamberto Manzoli
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  A bundled quality improvement program to standardize clinical blood pressure measurement in primary care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Kathryn A Carson; Jill A Marsteller; Katherine B Dietz; Gary J Noronha; Yea-Jen Hsu; Sarah J Flynn; Jeanne M Charleston; Greg P Prokopowicz; Edgar R Miller; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Uneven Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Measurement: A Multicentric Survey.

Authors:  Maria Elena Flacco; Lamberto Manzoli; Marco Bucci; Lorenzo Capasso; Dania Comparcini; Valentina Simonetti; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Manuela Nocciolini; Claudio D'Amario; Giancarlo Cicolini
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Prospective Register Of patients undergoing repeated OFfice and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (PROOF-ABPM): protocol for an observational cohort study.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Una Martin; Paramjit Gill; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Impact of cuff positioning on blood pressure measurement accuracy: may a specially designed cuff make a difference?

Authors:  Grzegorz Bilo; Oscar Sala; Carlotta Perego; Andrea Faini; Lan Gao; Anna Głuszewska; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Dario Pellegrini; Laura Maria Lonati; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Factors associated with prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among adults in Southern China: a community-based, cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Xinwei Zhang; Jie Zhang; Qingfang He; Ruying Hu; Lixin Wang; Danting Su; Yuanyuan Xiao; Jin Pan; Zhen Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimate of nocturnal blood pressure and detection of non-dippers based on clinical or ambulatory monitoring in the inpatient setting.

Authors:  Tan Xu; Yongqing Zhang; Xuerui Tan
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Richard Stevens; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Alison Ward; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Effect of cuff positioning on the accuracy of blood pressure measurement with automated electronic blood pressure monitors.

Authors:  Ya Li; Fang Li; Yi Li; Xiaoran Cui; Jing Li; Hua Zhi; Weidong Wang; Yanyan Sun; Wei Cui
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.