Literature DB >> 22902315

Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.

Nicholas Benikos1, Stuart J Johnstone, Steven J Roodenrys.   

Abstract

Similar to other executive functions, inhibitory control is thought to be a dynamic process that can be influenced by variations in task difficulty. However, little is known about how different task parameters alter inhibitory performance and processing as a task becomes more difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of varying task difficulty, via manipulation of reaction time deadline (RTD), on measures of inhibitory control, perceived effort, and task-related arousal (indexed by skin conductance level). Sixty adults completed a visual Go/Nogo task (70% Go) after being randomly assigned to one of three task difficulty conditions: High, Medium and Low, with RTDs of 300, 500 or 1000 ms, respectively. Results revealed incremental increases in Go/Nogo errors and greater perceived effort with increasing difficulty. No condition differences were found for arousal, but the amplitude of the Nogo N2 increased and peaked earlier with increasing task difficulty. In contrast, the Nogo P3 effect was reduced in the High condition compared to the Low and Medium conditions. Finally, the amplitude of N1 and P2 showed differential effects, with Nogo N1 increasing with task difficulty, while the Nogo P2 decreased. This study provides valuable baseline behavioural and ERP data for appropriately manipulating difficulty (via RTD) in Go/Nogo tasks - highlighting the potential key role of not only the N2 and P3, but also the N1 and P2 components for task performance.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902315     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  23 in total

1.  Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing.

Authors:  Brittany K Taylor; William J Gavin; Kevin J Grimm; Mark A Prince; Mei-Heng Lin; Patricia L Davies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Resting sympathetic arousal moderates the association between parasympathetic reactivity and working memory performance in adults reporting high levels of life stress.

Authors:  Ryan J Giuliano; Lisa M Gatzke-Kopp; Leslie E Roos; Elizabeth A Skowron
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.

Authors:  Raksha A Mudar; Hsueh-Sheng Chiang; Mandy J Maguire; Jeffrey S Spence; Justin Eroh; Michael A Kraut; John Hart
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Cognitive control training for emotion-related impulsivity.

Authors:  Andrew D Peckham; Sheri L Johnson
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2018-03-27

5.  Regulating task-monitoring systems in response to variable reward contingencies and outcomes in cocaine addicts.

Authors:  Kristen P Morie; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Hugh Garavan; John J Foxe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Women in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle have difficulty suppressing the processing of negative emotional stimuli: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Bethany R Lusk; Andrea R Carr; Valerie A Ranson; Kim L Felmingham
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  K P Morie; P De Sanctis; J J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The Role of Sociodemographic, Clinical and Neuropsychological Variables in Suicide Attempts in Depressed Adolescents.

Authors:  Armağan Aral; Gökçe Nur Say; Gizem Gerdan; Miraç Barış Usta; Ayşe ErgÜner Aral
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.339

9.  Cognitive control training for urgency: A pilot randomized controlled trial in an acute clinical sample.

Authors:  Andrew D Peckham; Jenna P Sandler; Devin Dattolico; R Kathryn McHugh; Daniel S Johnson; Thröstur Björgvinsson; Diego A Pizzagalli; Courtney Beard
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2021-09-14

10.  Online Movement Correction in Response to the Unexpectedly Perturbed Initial or Final Action Goals: An ERP and sLORETA Study.

Authors:  Lin Yu; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.