Literature DB >> 22902126

One, two, and many--a perspective on what groups of Drosophila melanogaster can tell us about social dynamics.

Jonathan Schneider1, Jade Atallah, Joel D Levine.   

Abstract

In the natural world, interactions between individuals occur in groups: an individual must recognize others, identify social opportunities, and discriminate among these options to engage in an interactive behavior. The presence of the group is known to exert an influence on individual group members, and this influence may feed back through the individual to affect behavior across the group. Such feedback has been observed in Drosophila melanogaster, for example, when mating frequency increases in groups composed of mixed strains compared to homogenous groups (Krupp et al., 2008 and Billeter et al. 2012). A working hypothesis is that social processes-to recognize, identify, discriminate, and engage-are innate. They rely on a combination of genetic inheritance, molecular interactions, and cell circuitry that produce neural and immunological responses. Here, we discuss studies that emphasize social interactions in four categories in Drosophila melanogaster: learning, circadian clocks, aggression, and mating. We also speculate that a systems-level network approach to the study of Drosophila groups will be instrumental in understanding the genetic basis of emergent group-level behavior.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902126     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387687-4.00003-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Genet        ISSN: 0065-2660            Impact factor:   1.944


  10 in total

1.  Automated identification of social interaction criteria in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Schneider; J D Levine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  anTraX, a software package for high-throughput video tracking of color-tagged insects.

Authors:  Asaf Gal; Jonathan Saragosti; Daniel Jc Kronauer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Larval Population Density Alters Adult Sleep in Wild-Type Drosophila melanogaster but Not in Amnesiac Mutant Flies.

Authors:  Michael W Chi; Leslie C Griffith; Christopher G Vecsey
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-08-11

Review 4.  Sleep in Drosophila and Its Context.

Authors:  Esteban J Beckwith; Alice S French
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Contribution of Social Influences through Superposition of Visual and Olfactory Inputs to Circadian Re-entrainment.

Authors:  Yong Ping; Lingzhan Shao; Minzhe Li; Luna Yang; Jiaxing Zhang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-01-21

6.  Social environment influences performance in a cognitive task in natural variants of the foraging gene.

Authors:  Nancy R Kohn; Christopher J Reaume; Celine Moreno; James G Burns; Marla B Sokolowski; Frederic Mery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mechanosensory interactions drive collective behaviour in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavan Ramdya; Pawel Lichocki; Steeve Cruchet; Lukas Frisch; Winnie Tse; Dario Floreano; Richard Benton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Density-functional fluctuation theory of crowds.

Authors:  J Felipe Méndez-Valderrama; Yunus A Kinkhabwala; Jeffrey Silver; Itai Cohen; T A Arias
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Traumatic injury in female Drosophila melanogaster affects the development and induces behavioral abnormalities in the offspring.

Authors:  Ved Chauhan; Abha Chauhan
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Paired fruit flies synchronize behavior: Uncovering social interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ugne Klibaite; Joshua W Shaevitz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.