AIMS: The standard surgical procedure for elderly (≥ 70 years) patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated. METHODS: A non-randomized prospective controlled study was conducted to compare lobectomy with segmental resection for the treatment of elderly clinical stage I lung cancer patients under different pulmonary function. Perioperative indicators including time and volume of thoracic drainage, incidence of postoperative complications, locoregional recurrence rates, and 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups according to pulmonary function: group 1 included 64 patients who had poor pulmonary function, with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) of less than 1.5 L, whereas group 2 consisted of 120 patients with an FEV(1) ≥ 1.5 L. The patients in group 1 had a longer postoperative mechanical ventilation time and a higher incidence rate of respiratory associated complications than those in group 2 (21.9 vs. 8.35%, p = 0.009). The local recurrence and long-term survival rates were not significantly different between lobectomy and segmental resection. Among the patients who underwent segmental resection, those who had regional lymph node dissection showed a higher 3-year and 5-year survival rate than those undergoing selected lymph node resection (77.8 vs. 51.7%, p = 0.042; 55.6 vs. 27.6%, p = 0.034), but this was not significant in lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental resection combined with regional lymph node resection could be the best choice for elderly clinical stage I NSCLC patients with FEV(1) < 1.5 L.
AIMS: The standard surgical procedure for elderly (≥ 70 years) patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated. METHODS: A non-randomized prospective controlled study was conducted to compare lobectomy with segmental resection for the treatment of elderly clinical stage I lung cancerpatients under different pulmonary function. Perioperative indicators including time and volume of thoracic drainage, incidence of postoperative complications, locoregional recurrence rates, and 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups according to pulmonary function: group 1 included 64 patients who had poor pulmonary function, with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) of less than 1.5 L, whereas group 2 consisted of 120 patients with an FEV(1) ≥ 1.5 L. The patients in group 1 had a longer postoperative mechanical ventilation time and a higher incidence rate of respiratory associated complications than those in group 2 (21.9 vs. 8.35%, p = 0.009). The local recurrence and long-term survival rates were not significantly different between lobectomy and segmental resection. Among the patients who underwent segmental resection, those who had regional lymph node dissection showed a higher 3-year and 5-year survival rate than those undergoing selected lymph node resection (77.8 vs. 51.7%, p = 0.042; 55.6 vs. 27.6%, p = 0.034), but this was not significant in lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental resection combined with regional lymph node resection could be the best choice for elderly clinical stage I NSCLCpatients with FEV(1) < 1.5 L.