Literature DB >> 22901817

Practice patterns of recently fellowship-trained reconstructive urologists.

Bradley A Erickson1, Bryan B Voelzke, Jeremy B Myers, William O Brant, Joshua A Broghammer, Thomas G Smith, Christopher D McClung, Nejd F Alsikafi, Sean P Elliott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the practice patterns of recently fellowship-trained reconstructive urologists to help guide fellowship program curriculum development and to evaluate the impact that formal reconstructive urology training has on academic urology programs.
METHODS: We evaluated the case logs of 7 recently fellowship-trained reconstructive urologists affiliated with US academic institutions from August 2009 to August 2011 (median years in practice = 2, range 1-6 years). We categorized cases into endoscopic, oncological, female, general (nononcological), and reconstructive. Our primary outcome was the volume of reconstructive procedures as a percentage of all procedures. Our secondary outcome was the correlation between years in practice and reconstructive volume and case complexity.
RESULTS: A total of 3561 cases were analyzed, representing 12 surgeon-years. Endoscopic surgery was most common (42.7%), followed by reconstructive (36.1%), general urologic (10.5%), and oncological (3.7%). The most common type of reconstructive procedure performed was anterior urethroplasty (mean 42.8 per year) followed by bladder reconstruction (mean 17.7 per year). The percentage of yearly cases considered reconstructive was positively associated with total years in practice (r = .688, P = .013) as was the complexity of artificial urinary sphincter cases (r = .857, P = .0004), but not urethral reconstructive complexity (r = .40, P = .197).
CONCLUSION: The demand for services delivered by fellowship-trained reconstructive urologists is high, as evidence by the large percentage of reconstructive procedures in this cohort even early in practice. With additional years in practice comes further specialization.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901817      PMCID: PMC3462229          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of urethroplasty after failed urethrotomy versus primary repair.

Authors:  G Barbagli; E Palminteri; M Lazzeri; G Guazzoni; D Turini
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Urology resident publication output and its relationship to future academic achievement.

Authors:  Glen Yang; Uwais B Zaid; Bradley A Erickson; Sarah D Blaschko; Peter R Carroll; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Residency training in surgery in the 21st century: a new paradigm.

Authors:  Carlos A Pellegrini; Andrew L Warshaw; Haile T Debas
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States.

Authors:  Travis L Bullock; Steven B Brandes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Authors:  David A Duchene; Alireza Moinzadeh; Inderbir S Gill; Ralph V Clayman; Howard N Winfield
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Attitudes and perceptions regarding subspecialty training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Sam Siddighi; Matthew Barker; Apurva Pancholy; Kelli Krallman; Mickey M Karram; Steven Kleeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-07-05

7.  Current minimally invasive practice patterns among postgraduate urologists.

Authors:  David A Duchene; Felipe Rosso; Ralph Clayman; Elspeth M McDougall; Howard N Winfield
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  National urology resident preceptorship program in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Firouz Daneshgari; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Associations between longitudinal changes in serum estrogen, testosterone, and bioavailable testosterone and changes in benign urologic outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer L St Sauver; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Cynthia J Girman; George G Klee; Michael M Lieber; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty?

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Jill C Buckley; Richard A Santucci; Sean P Elliott; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  4 in total

1.  Measuring and Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction after Anterior Urethroplasty Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures.

Authors:  Laura A Bertrand; Bryan B Voelzke; Sean P Elliott; Jeremy B Myers; Benjamin N Breyer; Alex J Vanni; Christopher D McClung; Christopher A Tam; Gareth J Warren; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Assessment of the Male Urethral Reconstruction Learning Curve.

Authors:  Sarah F Faris; Jeremy B Myers; Bryan B Voelzke; Sean P Elliott; Benjamin N Breyer; Alex J Vanni; Christopher A Tam; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Patient-Reported Sexual Function After Staged Penile Urethroplasty.

Authors:  Darshan P Patel; Sean P Elliott; Bryan B Voelzke; Bradley A Erickson; Christopher D McClung; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Jeremy B Myers
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  How much tumor surgery do early-career orthopaedic oncologists perform?

Authors:  Benjamin J Miller; Rajiv Rajani; Lee Leddy; Emily E Carmody Soni; Jeremy R White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.