Literature DB >> 22901586

Extended followup oncologic outcome of randomized trial between cryoablation and external beam therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer (T2c-T3b).

Joseph L Chin1, Ali A Al-Zahrani, Ana Maria Autran-Gomez, Andrew K Williams, Glenn Bauman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed and compared the survival outcomes between cryoablation and external beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (cT2c-cT3b).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, recruited from 1999 to 2002, were randomized to primary cryoablation or external beam radiotherapy. All patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 3 months before and 3 months after the procedures. Patients underwent followup transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months for cryoablation, and at 18 and 24 months for external beam radiotherapy) and as clinically indicated thereafter. Biochemical failure was based on the Phoenix criterion (prostate specific antigen nadir +2 ng/dl).
RESULTS: A total of 62 patients completed the trial. Median followup was 105.2 months (SD ±35.8). Accrual was limited due to newer data favoring longer neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and higher external beam radiotherapy dose for locally advanced prostate cancer. There was a greater reduction in prostate volume in the cryoablation group after intervention (-54% vs -34%, p ≤0.01). Disease specific survival and overall survival were comparable between the groups. However, the 8-year biochemical disease-free survival rate was significantly lower in the cryoablation group (17.4% vs 59.1%) (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial with median followup approaching 9 years showed that cryoablation was inferior in attaining biochemical disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (cT2c-T3). Cryoablation may be more suited for less bulky prostate cancer. Longer duration neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or a multimodal approach may provide optimal biochemical disease-free survival in this patient population.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901586     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Role of active surveillance and focal therapy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Salvage Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy After Definitive Cryoablation.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lischalk; Aaron E Katz; Seth R Blacksburg; Christopher Mendez; Astrid Sanchez; Michael C Repka; Matthew Witten; Samir Taneja; Herbert Lepor; Jonathan A Haas
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-13

Review 3.  Locally advanced prostate cancer: optimal therapy in older patients.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Is cryosurgery a feasible local therapy for bone metastatic prostate cancer?

Authors:  Mingxiong Sheng; Lingling Wan; Changming Liu; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, irreversible electroporation, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Run-Qi Guo; Xiao-Xiao Guo; Yuan-Ming Li; Zhi-Xin Bie; Bin Li; Xiao-Guang Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Primary cryotherapy for localised or locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hung Jung; Michael C Risk; Robert Goldfarb; Balaji Reddy; Bernadette Coles; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-30

Review 7.  Cryosurgery would be An Effective Option for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Lu Yang; Shengqiang Qian; Zhuang Tang; Feng Qin; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.