Literature DB >> 22901440

Identification of young people in the early stages of psychosis: validation of a checklist for use in primary care.

Paul French1, Jane Owens, Sophie Parker, Graham Dunn.   

Abstract

The study aims to establish the concordant validity of the Early Detection Primary Care Checklist (PCCL); a 20 item tool designed to help primary care practitioners identify young people in the early stages of psychosis. The checklist was completed by the referring practitioners of 176 young people referred to early detection teams across the UK. The concordant validity of the checklist was established by comparing screen results with a standardised psychiatric assessment for identifying young people who may be at a risk of developing psychosis (CAARMS). Preliminary analysis found that the simple checklist as originally conceived had excellent sensitivity (96%) but poor specificity (10%). Subsequent exploratory analysis led to the development of two better performing models for the combination of item responses to predict CAARMS outcomes. The first retained the use of all 20 checklist items and achieved sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 60%. The second retained six checklist items with p-values of 0.2 or above and achieved sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 47%. Although the initial checklist did not perform well as a screening tool the two models perform well in comparison to other, much longer, screening tools for this population. These tools are not intended as a diagnostic instrument; rather it has been designed as a bridge between primary care and specialist services and to build on the skills and knowledge already held by primary care practitioners. Following a consideration of the limitations of this study, the continued evaluation of the tools performance in practice is recommended.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901440     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  4 in total

1.  Psychosis risk screening in different populations using the Prodromal Questionnaire: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Savill; Jennifer D'Ambrosio; Tyrone D Cannon; Rachel L Loewy
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 2.732

2.  Identifying patients at risk of psychosis: a qualitative study of GP views in South West England.

Authors:  Daniela Strelchuk; Nicola Wiles; Catherine Derrick; Stanley Zammit; Katrina Turner
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Psychotic-Like Experiences: A Challenge in Definition and Assessment.

Authors:  Barbara Hinterbuchinger; Nilufar Mossaheb
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  A Public Health Perspective on Screening for Psychosis Within General Practice Clinics.

Authors:  Leda Kennedy; Kelsey A Johnson; Joyce Cheng; Kristen A Woodberry
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.