Literature DB >> 22901008

Unconstrained evolution in short introns? - an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism and divergence data from Drosophila.

F Clemente1, C Vogl2.   

Abstract

An unconstrained reference sequence facilitates the detection of selection. In Drosophila, sequence variation in short introns seems to be least influenced by selection and dominated by mutation and drift. Here, we test this with genome-wide sequences using an African population (Malawi) of D. melanogaster and data from the related outgroup species D. simulans, D. sechellia, D. erecta and D. yakuba. The distribution of mutations deviates from equilibrium, and the content of A and T (AT) nucleotides shows an excess of variance among introns. We explain this by a complex mutational pattern: a shift in mutational bias towards AT, leading to a slight nonequilibrium in base composition and context-dependent mutation rates, with G or C (GC) sites mutating most frequently in AT-rich introns. By comparing the corresponding allele frequency spectra of AT-rich vs. GC-rich introns, we can rule out the influence of directional selection or biased gene conversion on the mutational pattern. Compared with neutral equilibrium expectations, polymorphism spectra show an excess of low frequency and a paucity of intermediate frequency variants, irrespective of the direction of mutation. Combining the information from different outgroups with the polymorphism data and using a generalized linear model, we find evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism between D. melanogaster and D. simulans, D. sechellia, arguing against a bottleneck in D. melanogaster. Generally, we find that short introns can be used as a neutral reference on a genome-wide level, if the spatially and temporally varying mutational pattern is accounted for.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901008     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.516


  16 in total

1.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Allelic polymorphism at foxo contributes to local adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nicolas J Betancourt; Subhash Rajpurohit; Esra Durmaz; Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Thomas Flatt; Paul Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  The Genomic Architecture of Adaptation to Larval Malnutrition Points to a Trade-off with Adult Starvation Resistance in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tadeusz J Kawecki; Berra Erkosar; Cindy Dupuis; Brian Hollis; R Craig Stillwell; Martin Kapun
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Tandem Duplications and the Limits of Natural Selection in Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers; Julie M Cridland; Ling Shao; Tina T Hu; Peter Andolfatto; Kevin R Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Revised annotations, sex-biased expression, and lineage-specific genes in the Drosophila melanogaster group.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers; Ling Shao; Jaleal S Sanjak; Peter Andolfatto; Kevin R Thornton
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Unexpected selection to retain high GC content and splicing enhancers within exons of multiexonic lncRNA loci.

Authors:  Wilfried Haerty; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Patterns of linkage disequilibrium and long range hitchhiking in evolving experimental Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Susanne U Franssen; Viola Nolte; Ray Tobler; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Strong purifying selection at synonymous sites in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  David S Lawrie; Philipp W Messer; Ruth Hershberg; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Strong mutational bias toward deletions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome is compensated by selection.

Authors:  Evgeny V Leushkin; Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Massive habitat-specific genomic response in D. melanogaster populations during experimental evolution in hot and cold environments.

Authors:  Ray Tobler; Susanne U Franssen; Robert Kofler; Pablo Orozco-Terwengel; Viola Nolte; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.