| Literature DB >> 22900229 |
D V Moretti1, O Zanetti, G Binetti, G B Frisoni.
Abstract
We evaluated the relationship between brain rhythmicity and both the cerebrovascular damage (CVD) and amygdalohippocampal complex (AHC) atrophy, as revealed by scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in a cohort of subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). All MCI subjects underwent EEG recording and magnetic resonance imaging. EEGs were recorded at rest. Relative power was separately computed for delta, theta, alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3 frequency bands. In the spectral band power the severity of CVD was associated with increased delta power and decreased alpha2 power. No association of vascular damage was observed with alpha3 power. Moreover, the theta/alpha1 ratio could be a reliable index for the estimation of the individual extent of CV damage. On the other side, the group with moderate hippocampal atrophy showed the highest increase of alpha2 and alpha3 power. Moreover, when the amygdalar and hippocampal volumes are separately considered, within amygdalohippocampal complex (AHC), the increase of theta/gamma ratio is best associated with amygdalar atrophy whereas alpha3/alpha2 ratio is best associated with hippocampal atrophy. CVD and AHC damages are associated with specific EEG markers. So far, these EEG markers could have a prospective value in differential diagnosis between vascular and degenerative MCI.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22900229 PMCID: PMC3412101 DOI: 10.1155/2012/917537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Alzheimers Dis
Mean values ± standard error of demographic characteristics, neuropsychological and ARWMC scores of the MCI subgroups. F/M: female/male. Age and education are expressed in years. Group 1: no vascular damage; group 2: mild vascular damage; group 3: moderate vascular damage; group 4: severe vascular damage.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects (f/m) | 27 (18/9) | 41 (31/10) | 19 (10/9) | 12 (9/3) |
| Age | 70.1 (±1.7) | 69.9 (±1.1) | 69.7 (±1.9) | 70.5 (±2.4) |
| Education | 7.1 (±0.7) | 7 (±0.6) | 7 (±0.9) | 10 (±1.6) |
| MMSE | 26.7 (±0.4) | 26.5 (±0.4) | 27 (±0.4) | 26.1 (±0.7) |
| ARWMC scale | 0 | 1–5 | 6–10 | 11–15 |
Mean values ± standard deviation of sociodemographic characteristics, MMSE scores, white matter hyperintensities, and hippocampal and amygdalar volume measurements. Hippocampal and amygdalar volumes refer tothe whole amygdalohippocampal complex (AHC) and are singularly considered (individual). The t-test refers to AHC versus individual volume in each group.
| MCI cohort | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects (f/m) | 79 (42/37) | 27 (14/13) | 27 (15/12) | 25 (13/12) | |
| Age (years) | 69.2 ± 2.3 | 66.8 ± 6.8 | 69.4 ± 8.7 | 71.5 ± 6.9 | 0.1 |
| Education (years) | 7.7 ± 0.8 | 8.3 ± 4.5 | 6.7 ± 3.1 | 8.2 ± 4.6 | 0.2 |
| MMSE | 27.1 ± 0.4 | 27.5 ± 1.5 | 27.4 ± 1.5 | 26.6 ± 1.8 | 0.1 |
| Total AHC volume | 6965.3 ± 1248.8 | 8151.2 ± 436.4 | 7082.7 ± 266.9 | 5661.8 ± 720.4 | 0.00001 |
| AHC-hippocampal volume (mm3) | 4891.7 ± 902.6 | 5771.6 ± 361.1 | 4935.6 ± 380.9 | 3967.9 ± 650.3 | 0.00001 |
| AHC-amygdalar volume (mm3) | 2073.5 ± 348.7 | 2379.6 ± 321.3 | 2147.1 ± 301.3 | 1693.9 ± 288.5 | 0.0001 |
| Individual hippocampal volume (mm3) | 4889.8 ± 962.4 | 5809.6 ± 314.2 | 4969.4 ± 257.6 | 3890.1 ± 551.4 | 0.00001 |
| Individual amygdalar volume (mm3) | 2071.7 ± 446.4 | 2514.4 ± 259.5 | 2079.2 ± 122.8 | 1621.6 ± 185.2 | 0.0001 |
| White matter hyperintensities (mm3) | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 2.8 | 4.2 ± 3.8 | 4.1 ± 3.6 | 0.7 |
Figure 1Statistical ANOVA interaction among groups, factor and relative band power (delta, theta, alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3). In the diagram the difference in delta and alpha2 power among groups is also indicated, based on Duncan's post hoc testing. G1, group 1: no vascular damage; G2, group 2: mild vascular damage; G3, group 3: moderate vascular damage; G4, group 4: severe vascular damage [32, 35].
Mean values ± standard error of theta/alpha1, alpha1/alpha2, and alpha2/alpha3 ratios in the MCI subgroups. Group 1: no vascular damage; group 2: mild vascular damage; group 3: moderate vascular damage; group 4: severe vascular damage.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.7 (±0.05) | 0.77 (±0.05) | 1.17 (±0.05) | 1.39 (±0.14) |
|
| 0.46 (±0.03) | 0.5 (±0.03) | 0.53 (±0.05) | 0.47 (±0.04) |
|
| 1.27 (±0.12) | 1.16 (±0.1) | 0.85 (±0.05) | 0.79 (±0.07) |
Figure 2Statistical ANOVA interaction among group factors and relative band powers (delta, theta, alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3), on the full scalp region. The groups are based on mean and standard deviations in a normal elderly sample. Group 1: no hippocampal atrophy; group 2: mild hippocampal atrophy; group 3: moderate hippocampal atrophy; group 4: severe hippocampal atrophy. Post hoc results are indicated in the diagram (see [32, 35]).
Relative power band ratios in amygdalo-hippocampal complex (AHC), hippocampal and amygdalar atrophy. Hippocampal and amygdalar volumes refer to the whole amygdalo-hippocampal complex (AHC) and are singularly considered (individual).
| Hippocampal + amygdalar volume | theta/gamma ratio ( |
| alpha3/alpha2 ratio ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group1 | 1.40 ± 0.35 | 0.06 | 1.05 ± 0.11 | 0.07 |
| Group2 | 1.43 ± 0.35 | 1.11 ± 0.14 | ||
| Group3 | 1.47 ± 0.44 | 1.12 ± 0.16 | ||
| AHC-hippocampal volume | ||||
| Group1 | 1.39 ± 0.27 | 0.7 | 1.04 ± 0.11 | 0.03 |
| Group2 | 1.48 ± 0.45 | 1.11 ± 0.15 | ||
| Group3 | 1.43 ± 0.41 | 1.12 ± 0.14 | ||
| AHC-amygdalar volume | ||||
| Group1 | 1.36 ± 0.37 | 0.03 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 0.2 |
| Group2 | 1.44 ± 0.36 | 1.12 ± 0.16 | ||
| Group3 | 1.49 ± 0.39 | 1.09 ± 0.11 | ||
| Individual hippocampal volume | ||||
| Group1 | 1.39 ± 0.27 | 0.7 | 1.04 ± 0.11 | 0.1 |
| Group2 | 1.48 ± 0.45 | 1.07 ± 0.15 | ||
| Group3 | 1.43 ± 0.40 | 1.10 ± 0.14 | ||
| Individual amygdalar volume | ||||
| Group1 | 1.39 ± 0.37 | 0.1 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 0.4 |
| Group2 | 1.43 ± 0.36 | 1.12 ± 0.16 | ||
| Group3 | 1.46 ± 0.39 | 1.09 ± 0.11 |