| Literature DB >> 22899955 |
Xin Zhao1, Yong Wang, Shijun Yang, Wentong Zhang, Chengzhe Zu, Taotao Zhang, Binghua Tang, Baochun Zhang, Guozhang Li, Bo Deng, Dayong Cai.
Abstract
This study is aimed to investigate the Aconitum Lizhong pill (ALZ) pharmacological actions on hypothermia with indigestion, especially the ghrelin roles. The littermate-matched rats were randomly divided into four groups. Control did sham operation or standard diet, Model carried out interscapular brown adipose (IBA) removal with standard diet, Fat-diet did IBA removal with fat-diet, and ALZ did IBA removal and fat-diet with 4.536 g/kg/d ALZ. The potency of adaptive thermogenesis, ghrelin levels in plasma or gastric mucosa, thyroid hormones and metabolite in sera, expression of ghrelin mRNA, and protein in gastric mucous membrane were determined. ALZ relieved the hypothermia processes with indigestion, via inhibiting ghrelin expression and increasing ghrelin secretion; the dynamics from the therapy is supported with the energy changes as less body weight loss, less plasma lipid decrease, more plasma T(3) or T(4) increase with TSH decrease, and more compensation of thermogenic AUC decrease. Ghrelin played key roles in the actions of ALZ on the hypothermia with indigestion. The pharmacological mechanisms of ALZ involved the homeostasis of ghrelin expression and secretion.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22899955 PMCID: PMC3415136 DOI: 10.1155/2012/542461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Rat approached in four groups. IBA: interscapular brown adipose; ALZ: Aconitum Lizhong pill; IHC: immunohistochemistry; RIA: radioimmunoassay.
Growth ratio of weight in rats with IBA removed (mean ± SD, n = 18).
| Groups | Δ Ratio |
|---|---|
| Control | 0.71 ± 0.06 |
| Model | 0.45 ± 0.04aa |
| Fat-diet | 0.38 ± 0.05aabb |
| ALZ | 0.50 ± 0.03aabbcc |
Versus Control, a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01; versus Model, b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01; versus Fat-diet, c P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01.
Plasma metabolite levels in rats with IBA removed (mean ± SD, n = 18).
| Groups | TP (g/L) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | Glu (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 62.92 ± 3.24 | 1.85 ± 0.12 | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 10.66 ± 0.70 |
| Model | 56.36 ± 3.20aa | 1.50 ± 0.16aa | 0.40 ± 0.08aa | 10.50 ± 0.76aa |
| Fat-diet | 58.47 ± 2.42aabb | 1.66 ± 0.13aabb | 0.49 ± 0.07aabb | 9.14 ± 0.95aabb |
| ALZ | 54.55 ± 2.33aabbcc | 2.27 ± 0.12aabbcc | 0.53 ± 0.08aabbcc | 12.16 ± 1.17aabbcc |
Versus Control, a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01; versus Model, b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01; versus Fat-diet, c P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01.
Plasma thyroid-related hormones in rats with IBAremoved (mean ± SD, n = 18).
| Groups |
|
| TSH ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 50.14 ± 7.85 | 2.52 ± 0.27 |
| Model | 0.89 ± 0.08aa | 55.48 ± 10.47aa | 2.20 ± 0.47aa |
| Fat-diet | 0.77 ± 0.07aabb | 44.51 ± 7.00aabb | 2.74 ± 0.22aabb |
| ALZ | 0.65 ± 0.03aabbcc | 40.23 ± 6.89aabbcc | 3.19 ± 0.12aabbcc |
Versus Control, a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01; versus Model, b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01; versus Fat-diet, c P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01.
Thermogenic peak (°C) in rats with IBA removed (mean ± SD, n = 18).
| Groups |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 38.85 ± 0.66 | 39.00 ± 0.58 | 39.38 ± 0.57 |
| Model | 38.93 ± 0.86 | 38.64 ± 0.47aa | 38.13 ± 0.43aa |
| Fat-diet | 38.76 ± 0.61 | 38.38 ± 0.46aabb | 38.53 ± 0.52aabb |
| ALZ | 39.06 ± 0.83 | 38.50 ± 0.47aabb | 38.70 ± 0.51aabbcc |
Versus Control, a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01; versus Model, b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01; versus Fat-diet, P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01.
Thermogenic AUC (°C·h) in rats with IBA removed (mean ± SD, n = 18).
| Groups |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 76.72 ± 1.76 | 77.66 ± 1.00 | 78.88 ± 1.11 |
| Model | 76.83 ± 1.61 | 77.18 ± 1.02aa | 76.21 ± 0.91aa |
| Fat-diet | 76.70 ± 1.03 | 76.69 ± 1.00aabb | 76.67 ± 0.87aabb |
| ALZ | 76.90 ± 1.50 | 76.57 ± 1.17aabb | 77.19 ± 0.94aabbcc |
Versus Control, a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01; versus Model, b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01; versus Fat-diet, c P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01.
Ghrelin secretion in rats with IBA removed (mean ± SD).
| Groups | Plasma level | Stomach level | IHC level | mRNA level | Protein level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pg/mL, | ( | (OD/V, | (2−ΔΔCT, | (OD/OD, | |
| Control | 1091.34 ± 245.11 | 81.15 ± 11.05 | 0.2729 ± 0.0225 | 1.7154 ± 0.3963 | 0.7370 ± 0.1149 |
| Model | 2508.78 ± 298.22aa | 29.44 ± 2.66aa | 0.1793 ± 0.0207aa | 6.2047 ± 2.2695aa | 1.4357 ± 0.2766aa |
| Fat-diet | 1366.40 ± 473.17abb | 26.93 ± 4.18aabb | 0.1930 ± 0.0071aabb | 2.7509 ± 0.8356aabb | 0.9169 ± 0.0749aabb |
| ALZ | 1552.76 ± 460.08aabbc | 39.19 ± 3.07aabbcc | 0.2112 ± 0.0137aabbcc | 0.4372 ± 0.1574aabbcc | 0.2405 ± 0.1444aabbcc |
Versus Control, a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01; versus Model, b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01; versus Fat-diet, c P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01.
Figure 2Ghrelin cellular location in fundic gland (IHC × 400). (a) Control rats, (b) Model rats, (c) Fat-diet rats, (d) ALZ rats.
Figure 3Ghrelin expression in gastric mucosa. (a) Ghrelin mRNA expression was assessed by RT-PCR, and β-actin was used as control, (b) Ghrelin protein was assessed by western blot using antighrelin, and β-actin was used as control. Ghrelin band intensity was normalized to β-actin band intensity. The images were representative of each littermate of four groups originated from the same litter.
Figure 4Ghrelin role in ALZ for the hypothermia with indigestion.