Literature DB >> 22899754

Visual cortex responses to single- and simultaneous multiple-electrode stimulation of the retina: implications for retinal prostheses.

Mohit N Shivdasani1, James B Fallon, Chi D Luu, Rosemary Cicione, Penny J Allen, John W Morley, Chris E Williams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous stimulation of multiple electrodes to single-electrode stimulation in a retinal prosthesis.
METHODS: A platinum electrode array was implanted into the suprachoroidal space in six normally sighted anesthetized cats. Multiunit activity from the primary visual cortex in response to retinal stimulation was recorded. Cortical thresholds, yield of responses, dynamic ranges, and the spread of retinal activation were measured for three modes of stimulation: single electrode, half-row (six-electrode horizontal line), and column (seven-electrode vertical line).
RESULTS: Stimulation of the best half-rows and columns was found to elicit activity with higher yield and lower charge thresholds per electrode compared to the best single electrodes. Dynamic ranges between the three modes were similar. As expected, peak voltages measured for columns and half-rows were lower than those measured for single electrodes. Spread of retinal activation, determined by the increase in threshold with distance in the retina from the best site, was found to be similar between single- and multiple-electrode stimulation but dependent on orientation.
CONCLUSIONS: The lower thresholds, higher yield, equivalent dynamic ranges, and equivalent spread of retinal activation observed from simultaneous stimulation of multiple electrodes may be due to current and/or neural summation within the retina. Such stimulation techniques could be useful for the presentation of lines and edges of objects using a suprachoroidal retinal stimulator with low voltage compliance. Furthermore, the results suggest that more complex visual processing strategies in addition to sequential stimulation of individual electrodes should be considered for retinal prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899754     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

1.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  neuroBi: A Highly Configurable Neurostimulator for a Retinal Prosthesis and Other Applications.

Authors:  Kyle D Slater; Nicholas C Sinclair; Timothy S Nelson; Peter J Blamey; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  Spatial characteristics of evoked potentials elicited by a MEMS microelectrode array for suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in a rabbit.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Xiaohong Sui; Wenjia Liu; Yiliang Lu; Pengjia Cao; Zengguang Ma; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Chronic electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: a preclinical safety and efficacy study.

Authors:  David A X Nayagam; Richard A Williams; Penelope J Allen; Mohit N Shivdasani; Chi D Luu; Cesar M Salinas-LaRosa; Sue Finch; Lauren N Ayton; Alexia L Saunders; Michelle McPhedran; Ceara McGowan; Joel Villalobos; James B Fallon; Andrew K Wise; Jonathan Yeoh; Jin Xu; Helen Feng; Rodney Millard; Melanie McWade; Patrick C Thien; Chris E Williams; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  First-in-human trial of a novel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Peter J Blamey; Robyn H Guymer; Chi D Luu; David A X Nayagam; Nicholas C Sinclair; Mohit N Shivdasani; Jonathan Yeoh; Mark F McCombe; Robert J Briggs; Nicholas L Opie; Joel Villalobos; Peter N Dimitrov; Mary Varsamidis; Matthew A Petoe; Chris D McCarthy; Janine G Walker; Nick Barnes; Anthony N Burkitt; Chris E Williams; Robert K Shepherd; Penelope J Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  High-amplitude electrical stimulation can reduce elicited neuronal activity in visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Tianruo Guo; Chih-Yu Yang; Amr Al Abed; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.