Literature DB >> 22899307

Consent for gynaecological procedure: what do women understand and remember?

Sonu Pathak1, Modupe Odumosu, Syzana Peja, Katrina McIntyre, Dan Selo-Ojeme.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine patients' understanding and recall of consent information and risks associated with their procedure following gynaecological surgery.
METHOD: Patients planned for routine gynaecological surgery were invited to participate in the study by completing a self-administered questionnaire 4-6 h after day-surgery and 24 h after in-patient surgery. Collated data were analysed using standard statistical methods. RESULT: 544 women participated in the study. 321 (57.9 %) were day-cases and 233 (42.1 %) were in-patients. 33 % and 30.8 % of in-patients and day-cases, respectively did not recall any risk associated with their procedure. Among in-patients, women who did not recall any risk were less likely to have post primary education (84.2 vs. 96.2 %, P = 0.008), understood an information leaflet (79.5 vs. 95.1 %, P = 0.002), understood the consent counselling (85.5 vs. 98 %, P = 0.001), or remember the explanation of procedure and risks (85.5 vs. 98 %, P = 0.001). Among women who did not recall any risk, the day-case women were less likely to have read the information leaflet (86.4 vs. 96.2 %, P = 0.002), understood the information leaflet (79.5 vs. 98.9 %, P = 0.007), or understood the consent counselling (85.5 vs. 98.9 %, P < 0.001) when compared to in-patients.
CONCLUSION: A third of women who had planned gynaecology procedure do not recall any risk associated with the procedure. Provision of information leaflet did not make any consistent difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899307     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of blinding: sham suprapubic incisions in a randomized trial of retropubic midurethral sling in women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Charles W Nager; Holly E Richter; Alison C Weidner; Yvonne Hsu; Clifford Y Wai; Marie Paraiso; Tracy L Nolen; Dennis Wallace; Susan Meikle
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Using media to improve the informed consent process for youth undergoing pediatric endoscopy and their parents.

Authors:  Debra M Yeh; Stanford Chun; Laura Terrones; Jeannie S Huang
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-01

3.  Informed consent for clinical treatment in low-income setting: evaluating the relationship between satisfying consent and extent of recall of consent information.

Authors:  Ikenna I Nnabugwu; Fredrick O Ugwumba; Emeka I Udeh; Solomon K Anyimba; Oyiogu F Ozoemena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.