| Literature DB >> 22898887 |
Jerzy Falandysz1, Innocent C Nnorom, Grażyna Jarzyńska, Dominika Romińska, Kamila Damps.
Abstract
In the present study, Hg bioconcentration by Puffball (Lycoperdon perlatum) mushroom was investigated. Total Hg content of fruiting bodies and topsoil (0-10 cm layer) were determined by cold-vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy. For ten geographically distant sampling sites of Poland, Hg ranged from 0.91 ± 0.28 to 2.4 ± 0.4 (overall range 0.57-4.5) μg/g dry weight in the carpophores and 0.012 ± 0.002 to 0.063 ± 0.024 (overall range 0.0077-0.12) μg/g dw in topsoil. The mean values of the bioconcentration factor ranged from 28 ± 11 to 110 ± 36 (range 9.6-280) indicating that L. perlatum effectively accumulates Hg and could be classified as a Hg accumulator. Total Hg content of L. perlatum to some degree seems to be determined both by degree of soil contamination and metal bioavailability to mycelium and also the rate of transfer and accumulation in fruiting bodies at the sites surveyed. Summarized and discussed are published data available on total Hg and methylmercury in L. perlatum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22898887 PMCID: PMC3437224 DOI: 10.1007/s00128-012-0788-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol ISSN: 0007-4861 Impact factor: 2.151
Mercury in L. perlatum and soils (μg/g dw) and values of the BCF (arithmetic mean, SD, range and median, respectively)
| Site and year | Hg | BCF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caprophores | Soils | ||
| Krokowa, Pomerania, 2003 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 0.057 ± 0.018 | 46 ± 14 |
| n = 15 (85)a | (1.5–2.8) 2.5 | (0.027–0.090) 0.055 | (19–70) 44 |
| Lębork, Pomerania, 2007 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 0.043 ± 0.020 | 36 ± 15 |
| n = 15 (84) | (0.69–2.2) 1.3 | (0.025–0.096) 0.039 | (9.8–55) 39 |
| Lipusz, Pomerania, 2007 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 0.020 ± 0.007 | 110 ± 36 |
| n = 15 (47) | (1.2–2.8) 2.0 | (0.012–0.040) 0.018 | (31–160) 120 |
| Kartuzy, Pomerania, 2007/2008 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 0.047 ± 0.034 | 100 ± 100 |
| n = 13 (75) | (1.3–3.6) 2.6 | (0.010–0.080) 0.049 | (25–280) 68 |
| Mirachowo, Pomerania 2007 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.046 ± 0.016 | 28 ± 11 |
| n = 8 (16) | (0.92–1.5) 1.1 | (0.031–0.073) 0.037 | (13–42) 31 |
| Łapino, Pomerania, 2006/2007 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.025 ± 0.007 | 83 ± 34 |
| n = 13 (105) | (1.3–3.9) 1.7 | (0.020–0.045) 0.023 | (29–170) 78 |
| Kiwity, Warmia, 2003 | 2.4 ± 1.1 | 0.049 ± 0.036 | 77 ± 47 |
| n = 13 (53) | (1.1–4.5) 2.0 | (0.012–0.12) 0.042 | (9.6–140) 83 |
| Piska forests, Mazury, 2003 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.023 ± 0.005 | 65 ± 27 |
| n = 15 | (0.70–1.8) 1.4 | (0.013–0.032) 0.022 | (22–140) 60 |
| Ciechocinek, Kujawy, 2004 | 0.91 ± 0.28 | 0.012 ± 0.002 | 75 ± 24 |
| n = 15 (58) | (0.57–1.4) 0.82 | (0.0077–0.015) 0.013 | (47–120) 66 |
| Poniatowa, Chodelska Dale, 2001 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.063 ± 0.024 | 35 ± 23 |
| n = 11 | (1.1–2.9) 1.7 | (0.029–0.10) 0.066 | (12–90) 30 |
aNumber of samples and number of fruiting bodies (in parentheses)
bNumber of fruiting bodies
Mercury in Puffball and soils (μg/g dw) in Europe and values of the BCF (arithmetic mean, SD, range and median, respectively)
| Site and year | Hg | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caprophore | Soils | BCF | ||
| Sweden, Umeå, 1995 n-6(30)a | 1.6 ± 0.7 (0.77–2.8) | 0.10 ± 0.13 (0.018–0.25) | 65 ± 29 (11–110) | Falandysz et al. |
| Poland, Rogóźno, 1984/85 n-1 | 1.4 | Lasota and Witusik ( | ||
| Poland, Łubiana, Kościerzyna county, 1993 n = 15 | 1.1 ± 0.4 (0.48–1.9) 1.1 | Falandysz et al. | ||
| Poland, Zaborski Landscape Park, 1997/98 n = 16 | 3.7 ± 1.7 (1.5–6.8) | 0.031 ± 0.021 (0.0091–0.072) | 160 ± 120 (46–420) | Falandysz et al. |
| 3.3 | 0.025 | 120 | ||
| Poland, Borecka Forest, 1998 n = 16(146)a | 3.4 ± 1.3 (1.3–6.1) 3.2 | 0.020 ± 0.019 (0.009–0.040) | 200 ± 91 | Falandysz et al. |
| 0.018 | 190 | |||
| Poland, Łukta and Morąg, 1997/98 n = 16(168)a | 2.8 ± 0.5 (1.3–3.1) 2.2 | 0.054 ± 0.12 (0.012–0.41) 0.026 | 89 ± 48 (6.6–210) 78 | Falandysz et al. ( |
| Poland, 2001–2007 n = 133(549)a | 0.91 ± 0.28–2.4 ± 1.1 | 0.012 ± 0.002–0.063 ± 0.024 | 28 ± 11–110 ± 36 | b |
| (0.57–4.5); 0.82–2.6 | (0.0077–0.12) | (9.6–280) | ||
| Germany n = 2 | 3.3 (1.5–5.1) | Seeger ( | ||
| Slovakia | 2.0 ± 0.6 (0.3–3.2) | Svoboda et al. ( | ||
| Bohemia, Precambrian shales | 3.5 ± 0.1 | Řanda and Kučera ( | ||
| Bohemia, vicinity of multi-metal smelting plant | 4.0 ± 0.1 | |||
| Switzerland, Lausanne, contaminated site | 16 (6.6–22) 8.6 | Quinche ( | ||
| Switzerland, Lausanne, background site | 2.6 (2.3–5.8) 3.8 | Quinche ( | ||
| Switzerland | 0.58 [MeHg: 0.012] | 6.3 [MeHg: 12] | Reider et al. ( | |
| Slovenia n = 2 | 2.2 (2.1–2.3) | Byrne et al. ( | ||
| Slovenja, Idrija, Hg melting site n = 1 | 41 | Stegnar et al. ( | ||
| Slovenja, 5 km from Idrija Hg melting site n = 1 | 32 [MeHg 3.5] | Stegnar et al. ( | ||
| Slovenja, Podljubelj n = | 27 (20–34) [MeHg: 0.35] | 11 (7.1–19) | Stegnar et al. ( | |
| Slovenja, Podljubelj n = 7 | 25 (17–28) [MeHg: 0.35] | Stegnar et al. ( | ||
| Slovenja, background area n = 3 | 8.4 (5.3–14) [MeHg: 0.36] | 0.55 (0.53–0.58) n = 2 | Stegnar et al. ( | |
| Italy, Siena n = 1 | 2.8 | 0.31 | 9.0 | Bargagli and Baldi ( |
| Italy, Regino di Emilia | 1.9 (1.2–2.6) | Cocchi et al. ( | ||
aNumber of samples and number of fruiting bodies (in parentheses)
bPresent study