Literature DB >> 22898791

Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.

François Laliberté1, Winnie W Nelson, Patrick Lefebvre, Jeff R Schein, Jonathan Rondeau-Leclaire, Mei Sheng Duh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multiple daily dosing may be negatively associated with patient medication adherence, but the findings are inconclusive. The objective of this study was to compare adherence rates to once-daily (q.d.) versus twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing regimen of chronic medications in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors analyzed the PharMetrics Integrated Claims database from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2009. Adult patients with continuous insurance coverage, newly initiated on diabetes or hypertension medication, and having at least one AF diagnosis with no valvular heart disease or valve replacement procedures were included. Compliance to q.d. and b.i.d. therapies was calculated in two ways: medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC). Adherence was defined as an MPR or PDC ≥0.8. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to compare the probability of adherence between the q.d. and b.i.d. groups adjusting for baseline confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 8,256 q.d. and 2,441 b.i.d. patients were identified. The mean duration of exposure to therapy for q.d. and b.i.d. patients was 447 and 406 days (P < 0.001), respectively. Based on MPR, 75.3% of q.d. and 70.4% of b.i.d. patients were adherent (P < 0.001). For PDC at 12 months, the proportion of adherent patients for the q.d. and b.i.d. groups was 56.5% and 49.6% (P < 0.001), respectively. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of adherence for the q.d. relative to b.i.d. group were 1.26 (1.13, 1.41) based on MPR and 1.23 (1.07, 1.41) based on PDC at 12 months.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that nonvalvular AF patients treated with q.d. dosing regimens for chronic medications were associated with approximately a 26% higher likelihood of adherence compared with subjects on b.i.d. regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898791     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-012-0040-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  35 in total

1.  Overview of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert P Giugliano
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-03

Review 2.  Medication adherence in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia: associated factors and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Lucas N Marzec; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Benefits of once-daily dosing with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Walid Amara; Sotiris Antoniou
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.803

4.  National Trends in Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Use.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Eleanor Lucas; G Caleb Alexander; Zachary D Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Clinical Discussions in Antithrombotic Therapy Management : A Delphi Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Gabriello Marchetti; Emanuele Bertaglia; Alberto Camerini; Giuseppe De Angelis; Lucia Filippucci; Antonio Maggi; Sebastiano Marra; Carlo Racani; Carlo Serrati
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-02-28

Review 6.  Choosing Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: Practical Considerations We Need to Know.

Authors:  Alpesh Amin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

7.  Intermittent vs. Continuous Anticoagulation theRapy in patiEnts with Atrial Fibrillation (iCARE-AF): a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Stavros Stavrakis; Julie A Stoner; Joel Kardokus; Paul J Garabelli; Sunny S Po; Ralph Lazzara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations.

Authors:  Sebastian Harder; Jochen Graff
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  A clinical and pharmacologic assessment of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing for rivaroxaban.

Authors:  Reinhold Kreutz
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Individualising Anticoagulant Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

Authors:  Marco Alings
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.