Literature DB >> 22898693

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hormone-induced breast changes in young premenopausal women.

Tess V Clendenen1, Sungheon Kim, Linda Moy, Livia Wan, Henry Rusinek, Frank Z Stanczyk, Malcolm C Pike, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a pilot study to identify whether MRI parameters are sensitive to hormone-induced changes in the breast during the natural menstrual cycle and whether changes could also be observed during an oral contraceptive (OC) cycle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The New York University Langone Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved this HIPAA-compliant prospective study. All participants provided written informed consent. Participants were aged 24-31 years.We measured several non-contrast breast MRI parameters during each week of a single menstrual cycle (among 9 women) and OC cycle (among 8 women). Hormones were measured to confirm ovulation and classify menstrual cycle phase among naturally cycling women and to monitor OC compliance among OC users. We investigated how the non-contrast MRI parameters of breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and transverse relaxation time (T2) varied over the natural and the OC cycles.
RESULTS: We observed significant increases in MRI FGT% and ADC in FGT, and longer T2 in FGT in the luteal vs. follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. We did not observe any consistent pattern of change for any of the MRI parameters among women using OCs.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is sensitive to hormone-induced breast tissue changes during the menstrual cycle. Larger studies are needed to assess whether MRI is also sensitive to the effects of exogenous hormones, such as various OC formulations, on the breast tissue of young premenopausal women.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898693     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  10 in total

1.  Differences in breast density assessment using mammography, tomosynthesis and MRI and their implications for practice.

Authors:  A Tagliafico; G Tagliafico; N Houssami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Noam Nissan; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: protocol optimization, interpretation, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Elizabeth S McDonald
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Joao V Horvat; Manuela Durando; Soledad Milans; Sujata Patil; Jessica Massler; Girard Gibbons; Dilip Giri; Katja Pinker; Elizabeth A Morris; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative mri of the breast in the community radiology setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Chengyue Wu; Stephanie L Barnes; Angela M Jarrett; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Jeffery J Luci; Hakmook Kang; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov; John Virostko
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Variability of non-Gaussian diffusion MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) measurements in the breast.

Authors:  Mami Iima; Masako Kataoka; Shotaro Kanao; Makiko Kawai; Natsuko Onishi; Sho Koyasu; Katsutoshi Murata; Akane Ohashi; Rena Sakaguchi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quantitative Magnetization Transfer Imaging of the Breast at 3.0 T: Reproducibility in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard D Dortch; Jennifer G Whisenant; Hakmook Kang; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

8.  Correlation Between Mammographic Breast Density, Breast Tissue Type in Ultrasonography, Fibroglandular Tissue, and Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Afsaneh Alikhassi; Seyedeh Nooshin Miratashi Yazdi; Hedieh Akbari; Sona Akbari Kia; Masoud Baikpour
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2018-04-18

9.  Magnetization Transfer MRI of Breast Cancer in the Community Setting: Reproducibility and Preliminary Results in Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Chengyue Wu; David Ekrut; Angela M Jarrett; Raghave M Upadhyaya; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

10.  The effect of sex hormones on normal breast tissue metabolism: Evaluation by FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Yongsik Jung; Tae Hee Kim; Ji Young Kim; Sehwan Han; Young-Sil An
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.