Literature DB >> 22898320

Information quality of a Nursing Information System depends on the nurses: a combined quantitative and qualitative evaluation.

Margreet B Michel-Verkerke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Providing access to patient information is the key factor in nurses' adoption of a Nursing Information System (NIS). In this study the requirements for information quality and the perceived quality of information are investigated. A teaching hospital in the Netherlands has developed a NIS as a module of the Hospital Information System. After the NIS was implemented in six wards in March 2009, the NIS was evaluated.
METHODS: A paper questionnaire was distributed among all 195 nurses, who used the system. Included in the research were 93 (48%) respondents. Also twelve NIS-users were interviewed, using the USE IT-model.
RESULTS: Nurses express a broad need for information of each patient. Although the history is essential, the information needs are not very specified. They expect complete, correct, up-to-date and accessible information of each patient. The information quality of the NIS is satisfactory, but needs improvement. Since the achieved quality of information depends largely on the data-entry by the nurses themselves, a controversy exists between the required information quality and the effort needed to accomplish this.
CONCLUSIONS: The aspect of data-entry by the user of the information is not included in Information Quality-literature. To further increase the quality of information, a redesign of both process and system seems necessary, which reduces the information needs of nurses and rewards the nurse for accurate data-entry.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898320     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  3 in total

1.  A socio-technical assessment of the success of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems: the radiology technologist's perspective.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Tzeng; Kuang-Ming Kuo; Huang-Wei Lin; Tai-Yuan Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Practice-centred evaluation and the privileging of care in health information technology evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Darking; Rachel Anson; Ferdinand Bravo; Julie Davis; Steve Flowers; Emma Gillingham; Lawrence Goldberg; Paul Helliwell; Flis Henwood; Claire Hudson; Simon Latimer; Paul Lowes; Ian Stirling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Information Processing in Nursing Information Systems: An Evaluation Study from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Mahnaz Samadbeik; Nafiseh Shahrokhi; Marzieh Saremian; Ali Garavand; Mahdi Birjandi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.