Literature DB >> 22898314

Immediate reconstruction of the mandible after resection for aggressive odontogenic tumours: a cohort study.

E N M Simon1, M A W Merkx, B M Kalyanyama, F M Shubi, P J W Stoelinga.   

Abstract

The results are reported of a clinical follow-up study on 32 selected but consecutive patients with mandibular ameloblastoma. They were all treated by a segmental resection and reconstructed, using two 2.3 mm reconstruction plates and an autogenous particulate bone graft, taken from the anterior iliac crest, and platelet rich plasma. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 39 months, with an average of 27.9 months. Undisturbed healing occurred in 29 patients, while three had postoperative infections, but in only one case did that result in failure of the graft. The patients' appreciation was measured using an adapted quality of life questionnaire. The results were compared with a similar group who did not undergo reconstruction. The eating of solid food, appearance and speech were considerably better in the reconstructed group. The conclusion is that this means of reconstruction is appropriate for patients with benign but aggressive odontogenic tumours of the mandible, particularly in developing countries, since the expenses seem to be affordable.
Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898314     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterial scaffolds for treating osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Ameloblastomas of the mandible and maxilla.

Authors:  Ivana D Petrovic; Jocelyn Migliacci; Ian Ganly; Snehal Patel; Bin Xu; Ronald Ghossein; Joseph Huryn; Jatin Shah
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.697

3.  Unicystic Ameloblastoma: Rehabilitation with Chin Graft Harvested and Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis.

Authors:  J Sanz-Alonso; N Martínez-Rodríguez; M Martín-Ares; C Barona-Dorado; J Cortés Bretón-Brinkmann; J M Martínez-González
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

Review 4.  Establishing the natural history and growth rate of ameloblastoma with implications for management: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Nicolas R Smoll; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Surgical management of ameloblastoma. Review of literature.

Authors:  David Neagu; Oscar Escuder-de la Torre; Inés Vázquez-Mahía; Nicolás Carral-Roura; Guillermo Rubín-Roger; Ángel Penedo-Vázquez; Ramón Luaces-Rey; José-Luis López-Cedrún
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-01-01

6.  Indications of Free Grafts in Mandibular Reconstruction, after Removing Benign Tumors: Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fariña; Juan Pablo Alister; Francisca Uribe; Sergio Olate; Alvaro Arriagada
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.