OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in uterine artery embolisation (UAE), and to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the dominant fibroid and its relationship to contrast enhancement and fibroid volume reduction. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent UAE. Calculations were performed at baseline and 6 months post-embolisation. Fibroid ADC (expressed in 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1)) was calculated using b=0 and b=1000 DWI values. Fibroid enhancement was compared with background myometrium by measuring signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR). Fibroid volume was calculated using a prolate ellipse formula. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction (p<0.001) in fibroid ADC at 6 months (0.48; standard deviation, SD=0.26) as compared with baseline (1.01; SD=0.39). No significant change (p=0.07) was identified in 6-month myometrial ADC (1.09; SD=0.28) as compared with baseline (1.24; SD=0.20). Moderately strong and significant positive correlation was identified between baseline ADC and 6-month percentage volume reduction of the fibroid (correlation=0.66, p=0.007). No correlation was identified between SDNR and ADC at baseline or 6 months (r=0.01, p=0.97 and r=-0.13, p=0.64, respectively) or SDNR and percentage volume reduction at 6 months (correlation r=0.18, p=0.51). CONCLUSION: Baseline ADC of dominant fibroids shows a moderately strong correlation with subsequent volume reduction at 6 months following UAE. No correlation was identified between ADC values and contrast enhancement on the baseline or 6-month scans. Further prospective evaluation is needed before DWI can be utilised in clinical practice. Advances in knowledge DWI imaging may provide additional information about UAE and possibly help to predict uterine volume reduction.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in uterine artery embolisation (UAE), and to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the dominant fibroid and its relationship to contrast enhancement and fibroid volume reduction. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent UAE. Calculations were performed at baseline and 6 months post-embolisation. Fibroid ADC (expressed in 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1)) was calculated using b=0 and b=1000 DWI values. Fibroid enhancement was compared with background myometrium by measuring signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR). Fibroid volume was calculated using a prolate ellipse formula. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction (p<0.001) in fibroid ADC at 6 months (0.48; standard deviation, SD=0.26) as compared with baseline (1.01; SD=0.39). No significant change (p=0.07) was identified in 6-month myometrial ADC (1.09; SD=0.28) as compared with baseline (1.24; SD=0.20). Moderately strong and significant positive correlation was identified between baseline ADC and 6-month percentage volume reduction of the fibroid (correlation=0.66, p=0.007). No correlation was identified between SDNR and ADC at baseline or 6 months (r=0.01, p=0.97 and r=-0.13, p=0.64, respectively) or SDNR and percentage volume reduction at 6 months (correlation r=0.18, p=0.51). CONCLUSION: Baseline ADC of dominant fibroids shows a moderately strong correlation with subsequent volume reduction at 6 months following UAE. No correlation was identified between ADC values and contrast enhancement on the baseline or 6-month scans. Further prospective evaluation is needed before DWI can be utilised in clinical practice. Advances in knowledge DWI imaging may provide additional information about UAE and possibly help to predict uterine volume reduction.
Authors: Milan E J Pijl; Joost Doornbos; Martin N J M Wasser; Hans C van Houwelingen; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Johan L Bloem Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Eleni Liapi; Ihab R Kamel; David A Bluemke; Michael A Jacobs; Hyun S Kim Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: David B Stobo; Robert S Lindsay; John M Connell; Laurence Dunn; Kirsten P Forbes Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: P A Barber; D G Darby; P M Desmond; R P Gerraty; Q Yang; T Li; D Jolley; G A Donnan; B M Tress; S M Davis Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 7.914