| Literature DB >> 22898061 |
Ashley N Pellerin1, Richard Browning.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Longevity is the amount of time breeding females stay active in a herd by avoiding death or culling because of illness or reproductive failure. This is a trait of economic relevance in commercial small ruminant breeding herds as it affects lifetime reproductive output. The purpose of this study was to determine if breed of meat goat influences breeding doe survival rates and cumulative reproductive performance under semi-intensive management.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22898061 PMCID: PMC3460741 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Number and average age of new does entering the herd each year per breed
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 41 | 2.2 | 38 | 2.2 | 47 | 2.6 |
| 2004-05 | 26 | 2.4a | 13 | 2.2 | 4 | 2.0 |
| 2005-06 | 14 | 2.0 | 13 | 2.0 | 8 | 2.0 |
| 2006-07 | 34 | 2.1 | 11 | 2.0 | 11 | 2.0 |
| 2007-08 | 17 | 2.0 | 17 | 2.0 | 9 | 2.0 |
aThe maximum age of doe entries for any group was 3 years except for the 2004–05 Boer entry group in which four 4-yr-old does were added to the herd.
Reasons for doe exits from the study herd under the actual culling protocol
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death by illness, na | 89 (80.9) | 39 (84.8) | 37 (82.2) | 165 (82.1) |
| Culled, n | 16 (14.6) | 5 (10.9) | 4 (8.9) | 25 (12.4) |
| Death by accident, n | 5 (4.5) | 2 (4.3) | 4 (8.9) | 11 (5.5) |
| Breed total, n | 110 | 46 | 45 | 201 |
aValue in parenthesis is the proportion of the column exit total represented by a particular cause of exit. Breeds did not differ (P > 0.30) for proportion of exits within any cause.
Reasons for doe exits from the study herd under the alternative culling protocol
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death by illness, na | 57 (43.9) | 32 (47.1) | 29 (50.0) | 118 (46.1) |
| Culled, n | 71 (54.6) | 34 (50.0) | 26 (44.8) | 131 (51.2) |
| Death by accident, n | 2 (1.5) | 2 (2.9) | 3 (5.2) | 7 (2.7) |
| Breed total, n | 130 | 68 | 58 | 256 |
aValue in parenthesis is the proportion of the column exit total represented by a particular cause of exit. Breeds did not differ (P > 0.20) for proportion of exits within any cause.
Figure 1Survival estimates (± se) for doe breeds using actual culling protocol of removal after second reproductive failure. Boer differ (P < 0.001) from Kiko and Spanish for the survival curve over 6 years of production and for the stayability rate at each year of possible presence in the herd. Does in Year 1 were approximately 2–3 years of age. Does reaching Year 6 would have been approximately 7–8 years of age.
Figure 2Survival estimates (± se) for doe breeds using alternative culling protocol of removal after first reproductive failure. Boer differ (P < 0.001) from Kiko and Spanish for the survival curve over 6 years of production and for the stayability rate at each year of possible presence in the herd. Does in Year 1 were approximately 2–3 years of age. Does reaching Year 6 would have been approximately 7–8 years of age.
Effect of doe breed on whole-herd cumulative productivity at different stayability endpoints per available doe
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| | Stayability: Year 2 | ||
| Does available, n | 132 | 92 | 79 |
| Total kids weanedb, n | 1.43 ± 0.18x | 2.45 ± 0.31y | 2.62 ± 0.34y |
| Total weight weanedb, kg | 27.0 ± 1.8x | 48.1 ± 2.2y | 45.6 ± 2.4y |
| | Stayability: Year 3 | ||
| Does available, n | 115 | 75 | 70 |
| Total kids weanedb, n | 2.08 ± 0.28x | 3.60 ± 0.48y | 3.84 ± 0.52y |
| Total weight weanedb, kg | 39.3 ± 2.9x | 70.7 ±3.5y | 66.1 ± 3.7y |
| | Stayability: Year 5 | ||
| Does available, n | 67 | 51 | 51 |
| Total kids weanedb, n | 3.24 ± 0.34x | 6.09 ± 0.58y | 6.21 ± 0.61y |
| Total weight weanedb, kg | 57.1 ± 5.7x | 110.8 ± 6.4y | 99.8 ± 6.5y |
aDoes with opportunity to reach a stayability endpoint.
bLeast square mean ± se.
x,yMeans within a row not sharing a common superscript differ (P < 0.001).
Effect of doe breed on whole-herd cumulative kids weaned per available doeunder the alternative culling protocol
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| | Stayability: Year 2 | ||
| Does available, n | 132 | 92 | 79 |
| Total kids weanedb, n | 1.35 ± 0.18x | 2.38 ± 0.32y | 2.54 ± 0.37y |
| Change in total kids weanedbc, n | -0.05 ± 0.03 | -0.05 ± 0.03 | -0.05 ± 0.03 |
| | Stayability: Year 3 | ||
| Does available, n | 115 | 75 | 70 |
| Total kids weanedb, n | 1.95 ± 0.27x | 3.37 ± 0.47y | 3.64 ± 0.51y |
| Change in total kids weanedbc, n | -0.15 ± 0.06* | -0.24 ± 0.07* | -0.21 ± 0.08* |
| | Stayability: Year 5 | ||
| Does available, n | 67 | 51 | 51 |
| Total kids weanedb, n | 2.87 ± 0.33x | 5.42 ± 0.56y | 5.91 ± 0.61y |
| Change in total kids weanedbc, n | -0.46 ± 0.15* | -0.71 ± 0.18* | -0.35 ± 0.18 |
aDoes with opportunity to reach a stayability endpoint.
bLeast square mean ± se.
cChange from the actual culling protocol.
x,yMeans within a row not sharing a common superscript differ (P < 0.001).
*Mean within cell differs from 0 (P ≤ 0.01).