Julia F Costich1, Dana J Patton. 1. Department of Health Services Management, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, 40536-0003, USA. julia.costich@uky.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored the association between the legal infrastructure of local public health, as expressed in the exercise of local fiscal and legislative authority, and local population health outcomes. METHODS. Our unit of analysis was public health jurisdictions with at least 100,000 residents. The dependent variable was jurisdiction premature mortality rates obtained from the Mobilize Action Toward Community Health (MATCH) database. Our primary independent variables represented local public health's legal infrastructure: home rule status, board of health power, county government structure, and type of public health delivery system. Several control variables were included. We used a regression model to test the relationship between the varieties of local public health legal infrastructure identified and population health status. RESULTS: The analyses suggested that public health legal infrastructure, particularly reformed county government, had a significant effect on population health status as a mediator of social determinants of health. CONCLUSIONS: Because states shape the legal infrastructure of local public health through power-sharing arrangements, our findings suggested recommendations for state legislation that positions local public health systems for optimal impact. Much more research is needed to elucidate the complex relationships among law, social capital, and population health status.
OBJECTIVES: We explored the association between the legal infrastructure of local public health, as expressed in the exercise of local fiscal and legislative authority, and local population health outcomes. METHODS. Our unit of analysis was public health jurisdictions with at least 100,000 residents. The dependent variable was jurisdiction premature mortality rates obtained from the Mobilize Action Toward Community Health (MATCH) database. Our primary independent variables represented local public health's legal infrastructure: home rule status, board of health power, county government structure, and type of public health delivery system. Several control variables were included. We used a regression model to test the relationship between the varieties of local public health legal infrastructure identified and population health status. RESULTS: The analyses suggested that public health legal infrastructure, particularly reformed county government, had a significant effect on population health status as a mediator of social determinants of health. CONCLUSIONS: Because states shape the legal infrastructure of local public health through power-sharing arrangements, our findings suggested recommendations for state legislation that positions local public health systems for optimal impact. Much more research is needed to elucidate the complex relationships among law, social capital, and population health status.
Authors: Edward L Baker; Margaret A Potter; Deborah L Jones; Shawna L Mercer; Joan P Cioffi; Lawrence W Green; Paul K Halverson; Maureen Y Lichtveld; David W Fleming Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: James Studnicki; Linda S Gipson; Donald J Berndt; John W Fisher; Matthew Callandar; Etienne Pracht; Barbara Langland-Orban Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Glen P Mays; Sharla A Smith; Richard C Ingram; Laura J Racster; Cynthia D Lamberth; Emma S Lovely Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anthony D Moulton; Shawna L Mercer; Tanja Popovic; Peter A Briss; Richard A Goodman; Melisa L Thombley; Robert A Hahn; Daniel M Fox Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-11-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: G H DeFriese; J S Hetherington; E F Brooks; C A Miller; S C Jain; F Kavaler; J S Stein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1981-10 Impact factor: 9.308